Consequences of Resorting to Fines and Investments to Regulate Data Portability
References
- (2004) An empirical analysis of network externalities in peer-to-peer music-sharing networks. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):155–174.Link, Google Scholar
- Australian Banking Association (2025) Open banking. Accessed January 1, 2025, https://www.ausbanking.org.au/priorities/open-banking.Google Scholar
- (1997) Ownership and investment in electronic networks. Inform. Systems Res. 8(4):321–341.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Bundling for flexibility and variety: An economic model for multiproducer value aggregation. Management Sci. 67(4):2365–2380. Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) The creator economy: Managing ecosystem supply, revenue sharing, and platform design. Management Sci. 68(7):5233–5251.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Selling customer information to competing firms. Econom. Lett. 149:10–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Information assets, technology and organization. Management Sci. 40(12):1645–1662.Link, Google Scholar
- California State Legislature (2018) California consumer privacy act of 2018. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?division=3.&part=4.&lawCode=CIV&title=1.81.5.Google Scholar
- (2016) Should online content providers be allowed to subsidize content?—An economic analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):580–595.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The impact of the data protection regulation in the EU. Intertic Policy Paper.Google Scholar
- Competition and Markets Authority (2021) Corporate report update on open banking. Accessed January 1, 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/update-governance-of-open-banking/update-on-open-banking.Google Scholar
- Council of European Union (2016) Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (GDPR). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.Google Scholar
- Council of European Union (2022) Regulation 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council (DMA). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj.Google Scholar
- (2018) Facing Facebook: Data portability and interoperability are anti-monopoly medicine. EFF (July 24), https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/07/facing-facebook-data-portability-and-interoperability-are-anti-monopoly-medicine.Google Scholar
- (2020) Data and competition: A general framework with applications to mergers, market structure, and privacy policy. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14446, London.Google Scholar
- (2014) Statistical modelling approach to estimation of average revenue per user in telecom service-a case study. Internat. J. Sci. Engrg. Tech. 3(5):557–560.Google Scholar
- (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 67(3):297–308.Google Scholar
- (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
- European Political Strategy Centre (2017) EU policies for a thriving data ecosystem. Eur. Political Strategy Centre (21).Google Scholar
- (2019) Big data and firm dynamics. AEA Papers and Proc., vol. 109 (American Economic Association, Nashville, TN), 38–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The role of user privacy concerns in shaping competition among platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):698–722.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) 10 years later, twitter still isn’t close to making money. CNN Business. Accessed October 1, 2020, https://money.cnn.com/2016/03/21/technology/twitter-10th-anniversary/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Putting the right to data portability into a competition law perspective. Law: J. Higher School Econom. Annual Rev. 53–63. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Competition among virtual communities and user valuation: The case of investing-related communities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(1):68–85.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage. RAND J. Econom. 54(4):638–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd ed. (Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2022) What is average revenue per unit (ARPU)? Accessed November 1, 2023, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/arpu.asp.Google Scholar
- (2019) The impact of access to consumer data on the competitive effects of horizontal mergers and exclusive dealing. Economics Management Strategy 28(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Does data portability facilitate entry? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 69:102564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Contracting theory and accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 32(1–3):3–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Converting technology to mitigate environmental damage. Management Sci. 50(8):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Strava review: The best training app for stat-obsessed runners. Tom’s Guide (September 30), https://www.tomsguide.com/reviews/strava-review.Google Scholar
- (2022) Sponsored data: Smarter data pricing with incomplete information. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):362–382.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Meta Platforms Inc (2021) Annual Report. Accessed April 14, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680122000018/fb-20211231.htm.Google Scholar
- (1996) Equivalence of taxes and subsidies in the control of production externalities. Management Sci. 42(3):307–320.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Balancing openness and prioritization in a two-tier internet. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):745–763.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Monopolistic competition and optimum product selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):304–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
- OECD (2021) Mapping data portability initiatives, opportunities and challenges (321). https://doi.org/10.1787/a6edfab2-en.Google Scholar
- (2019) Why Facebook generates much more money per user than its rivals. CNBC (November 1), https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/01/facebook-towers-over-rivals-in-the-critical-metric-of-revenue-per-user.html.Google Scholar
- (2018) Data portability and competition between technology platforms. Forbes (March 6), https://www.forbes.com/sites/washingtonbytes/2018/03/06/data-portability-and-competition-between-technology-platforms.Google Scholar
- Strava (2024) Exporting your data and bulk export. Accessed December 1, 2022, https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/216918437-Exporting-your-Data-and-Bulk-Export.Google Scholar
- (2012) Why the right to data portability likely reduces consumer welfare: Antitrust and privacy critique. Md. L. Rev. 72:335.Google Scholar
- (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- United States House Committee on the Judiciary (2021) Augmenting compatibility and competition by enabling service switching (Access Act 2021). Accessed September 1, 2024, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3849.Google Scholar
- United States House of Representatives (2020) Majority staff report and recommendations on investigation of competition in digital markets. Accessed September 1, 2024, https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/competition_in_digital_markets.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2019) Data portability on the Internet. Bus. Inf. Syst. Engrg. 61(5):551–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Electronic b2b marketplaces with different ownership structures. Management Sci. 53(6):952–961.Link, Google Scholar

