Board Fiduciary Duty, Communication, and Compensation

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Akyol AC, Verwijmeren P (2018) Director skill sets. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):641–662. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghamolla C, Hashimoto T (2021) Aggressive boards and CEO turnover. J. Accounting Res. 59(2):437–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CS, Gow ID, Larcker DF (2013) The efficacy of shareholder voting: Evidence from equity compensation plans. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):909–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai G, Krishnan R (2015) Do hospitals without physicians on the board deliver lower quality of care? Amer. J. Medical Quality 30(1):58–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldenius T, Melumad N, Meng X (2014) Board composition and CEO power. J. Financial Econom. 112(1):53–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldenius T, Meng X, Qiu L (2019) Biased boards. Accounting Rev. 94(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldenius T, Meng X, Qiu L (2021) The value of board commitment. Rev. Accounting Stud. 26:1587–1622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bautzer T, Nishant N (2025) Citigroup’s shareholders approve 2024 pay for CEO, executives, new shares for grants. Reuters (April 29), https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/citigroups-shareholders-approve-2024-pay-ceo-executives-new-shares-grants-2025-04-29/.Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA (2003) The case for shareholder access to the ballot. Bus. Lawyer 59(1):43–66.Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2003) Executive compensation as an agency problem. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(3):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2004) Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Cremers KM, Peyer UC (2011) The CEO pay slice. J. Financial Econom. 102(1):199–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J (2015) Incentive contracts, market risk, and cost of capital. Contemporary Accounting Res. 32(4):1337–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Marinovic I, Milone M (2024) Explaining the compensation of superstar CEOs: The case of Elon Musk. Preprint, submitted June 20, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4863514.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bratton WW, Wachter ML (2010) The case against shareholder empowerment. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 158:653–728.Google Scholar
• Brunarski KR, Campbell TC, Harman YS (2015) Evidence on the outcome of say-on-pay votes: How managers, directors, and shareholders respond. J. Corporate Finance 30:132–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Walkling RA (2011) Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(2):299–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter ME, Zamora VL (2007) Shareholder remuneration votes and CEO compensation design. Preprint, submitted July 31, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1004061.Google Scholar
• Caskey J, Laux V (2017) Corporate governance, accounting conservatism, and manipulation. Management Sci. 63(2):424–437.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen D, Mittendorf B, Partridge C (2024) An examination of direct and spillover effects of accounting standards on firms’ information environments. Preprint, submitted January 21, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4697367.Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):431–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correa R, Lel U (2016) Say on pay laws, executive compensation, pay slice, and firm valuation around the world. J. Financial Econom. 122(3):500–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couvert M (2024) What are the firm value implications of sec-challenged shareholder proposals? Management Sci. 71(6):4728–4756.Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Google Scholar
• Cuñat V, Gine M, Guadalupe M (2012) The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. J. Finance 67(5):1943–1977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dass N, Kini O, Nanda V, Onal B, Wang J (2014) Board expertise: Do directors from related industries help bridge the information gap? Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1533–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis DK, Jochem T, Rajamani A (2020) Shareholder governance and CEO compensation: The peer effects of say on pay. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(7):3130–3173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drymiotes G (2007) The monitoring role of insiders. J. Accounting Econom. 44(3):359–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drymiotes G, Lin H (2020) Shareholder empowerment and board of directors effectiveness. Contemporary Accounting Res. 37(4):2649–2695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drymiotes G, Sivaramakrishnan K (2012) Board monitoring, consulting, and reward structures. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(2):453–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Gabaix X (2016) Executive compensation: A modern primer. J. Econom. Literature 54(4):1232–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Gabaix X, Jenter D (2017) Executive compensation: A survey of theory and evidence. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS eds. The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 383–539. Google Scholar
• Faleye O, Hoitash R, Hoitash U (2018) Industry expertise on corporate boards. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting 50:441–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. J. Law Econom. 26(2):327–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang L, Huang S (2024) The governance of director compensation. J. Financial Econom. 155:103813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Göx RF (2018) Executive compensation, corporate governance, and say on pay. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, vol. 12 (Now Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Fisch J, Palia D, Solomon SD (2018) Is say on pay all about pay: The impact of firm performance. Harvard Bus. Law Rev. 8:101–129.Google Scholar
• Francis B, Hasan I, Wu Q (2015) Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance. Financial Management 44(3):547–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman HL (2014) Implications of power: When the CEO can pressure the CFO to bias reports. J. Accounting Econom. 58(1):117–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FW Cook (2024) Aggregate share-based report. (October 1), https://fwcook.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/24-10-01_FWC_2024_Aggregate_Share_Based_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Landier A (2008) Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):49–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Ishii J, Metrick A (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Göx RF (2008) Tax incentives for inefficient executive pay and reward for luck. Rev. Accounting Stud. 13:452–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Göx RF (2012) Say on Pay, Governance Quality, and Shareholder Pressure (University of Zurich, Zurich).Google Scholar
• Gregor M, Michaeli B (2024) Board compensation and investment efficiency. Preprint, submitted February 20, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4717755.Google Scholar
• Gregor M, Michaeli B (2025) Board bias, information, and investment efficiency. Rev. Accounting Stud. 30:1432–1462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (2008) A theory of board control and size. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1797–1832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hals T (2023) Tesla directors pay $735 mln to settle lawsuit over excess compensation. Reuters (July 17), https://www.reuters.com/legal/tesla-directors-settle-lawsuit-over-compensation-735-mln-2023-07-17/.Google Scholar
• Hart O, Zingales L (2017) Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. J. Law Finance Accounting 2(2):247–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann C, Huddart S, Pfeiffer T (2023) An analysis of net-outcome contracting with applications to equity-based compensation. Rev. Accounting Stud. 28:1657–1689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48(3):831–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Whitler KA, Semadeni M (2014) Power to the principals! An experimental look at shareholder say-on-pay voting. Acad. Management J. 57(1):94–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Sivaramakrishnan K (2008) Who monitors the monitor? The effect of board independence on executive compensation and firm value. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(3):1371–1401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Tayan B (2023) Mega grants: Why would a board approve nine-figure CEO pay? Working paper, Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
• Laux V (2008) Board independence and CEO turnover. J. Accounting Res. 46(1):137–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laux C, Laux V (2009) Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. Accounting Rev. 84(3):869–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laux V, Mittendorf B (2011) Board independence, executive pay, and the adoption of pet projects. Contemporary Accounting Res. 28(5):1467–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Nan L, Zhao R (2018) Corporate governance roles of information quality and corporate takeovers. Rev. Accounting Stud. 23:1207–1240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malenko N (2014) Communication and decision-making in corporate boards. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1486–1532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz SC (2014) Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Accounting Rev. 89(2):695–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melumad ND, Mookherjee D, Reichelstein S (1995) Hierarchical decentralization of incentive contracts. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):654–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng X (2024) Information, incentives, and CEO replacement. Accounting Rev. 99(2):369–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng X, Tian JJ (2020) Board expertise and executive incentives. Management Sci. 66(11):5448–5464.Link, Google Scholar
• Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988) Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. 20:293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen H, Calantone R, Krishnan R (2020) Influence of social media emotional word of mouth on institutional investors’ decisions and firm value. Management Sci. 66(2):887–910.Link, Google Scholar
• PwC (2022) Stock-based compensation. PwC Viewpoint (January), https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/stockbased_compensat/assets/pwcstockcompjan2022v2.pdf.Google Scholar
• Reuters (2014) Burberry shareholders oppose CEO Bailey’s pay package. Reuters (July 11), https://www.reuters.com/article/business/burberry-shareholders-oppose-ceo-baileys-pay-pack age-idUSL6N0PM2T5.Google Scholar
• Reuters (2021) Elon Musk defends SolarCity deal against shareholder lawsuit. The Guardian (July 12), https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/jul/12/elon-musk-tesla-solarcity-deal-share holder-lawsuit.Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Marin G, Lozano-Reina G, Baixauli-Soler JS, Lucas-Perez ME (2017) Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Bus. Res. Quart. 20(4):226–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Ziv M, Weisbach MS (2013) What do boards really do? Evidence from minutes of board meetings. J. Financial Econom. 108(2):349–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2020) Procedural requirements and resubmission thresholds under exchange act rule 14a-8. Federal Register (November 4), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-11-04/pdf/2020-21580.pdf.Google Scholar
• Sengupta P, Zhang S (2015) Equity-based compensation of outside directors and corporate disclosure quality. Contemporary Accounting Res. 32(3):1073–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stempel J (2012) Citigroup CEO and directors sued over executive pay. Reuters (April 20), https://www.reuters.com/article/world/citigroup-ceo-and-directors-sued-over-executive-pay-idUSBRE 83J158/.Google Scholar
• Stempel J (2025) SEC wins dismissal of lawsuit challenging tighter rules on shareholder proposals. Reuters (June 5), https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/sec-wins-dismissal-lawsuit-challenging-tighter-rules-shareholder-proposals-2025-06-05/.Google Scholar
• Tesla, Inc. (2018) Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (February 8), https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000119312518035345/d524719ddef14a.htm.Google Scholar
• Thampy N (2016) Sequence of events before Microsoft acquired LinkedIn. Medium (July 28), https://ninan99.medium.com/sequence-of-events-before-microsoft-acquired-linkedin-6d9838434657.Google Scholar
• Wilcox J (2014) Directors Should Communicate with Shareholders. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J. Financial Econom. 40(2):185–211.Crossref, Google Scholar