Learning Product Improvement from Consumer Evaluations

References

• Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M (2019) Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proc. 25th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Amplayo RK, Kim J, Sung S, Hwang S (2018) Cold-start aware user and product attention for sentiment classification. Preprint, submitted June 14, https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.05507.Google Scholar
• Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Sci. 57(8):1485–1509.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing 59(3):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (2011) Product design and marketing: Reflections after fifteen years. J. Product Innovation Management 28(3):378–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnap A, Hauser JR, Timoshenko A (2023) Product aesthetic design: A machine learning augmentation. Marketing Sci. 42(6):1029–1056.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Tseng YD (2011) Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework. Decision Support Systems 50(4):755–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker R, Trusov M (2010) Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(4):293–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. 12(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Clausing DP (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66(3):63–73.Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Tellis GJ, Griffin A (2006) Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Sci. 25(6):687–717.Link, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2018) Ideation–execution transition in product development: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 64(5):2238–2262.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee TY, Bradlow ET (2011) Automated marketing research using online customer reviews. J. Marketing Res. 48(5):881–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Choeh JY (2017) Exploring the determinants of and predicting the helpfulness of online user reviews using decision trees. Management Decision 55(4):681–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao H, Yang Q, Wu X (2023) Customer preference analysis from online reviews by a 2-additive Choquet integral-based preference disaggregation model. Tech. Econom. Development Econom. 29(2):411–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li KJ, Chen H, Balachander S (2017) The effects of products’ aesthetic design on demand and marketing-mix effectiveness: The role of segment prototypicality and brand consistency. J. Marketing 81(1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirtalaie MA, Hussain OK, Chang E, Hussain FK (2018) Sentiment analysis of specific product’s features using product tree for application in new product development. Adv. Intelligent Networking Collaborative Systems: The 9th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Networking Collaborative Systems (INCoS-2017) (Springer, New York), 82–95.Google Scholar
• Ng C, Law KM (2020) Investigating consumer preferences on product designs by analyzing opinions from social networks using evidential reasoning. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 139:106180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olewnik A, Lewis K (2008) Limitations of the house of quality to provide quantitative design information. Internat. J. Quality Reliability Management 25(2):125–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi J, Zhang Z, Jeon S, Zhou Y (2016) Mining customer requirements from online reviews: A product improvement perspective. Inform. Management 53(8):951–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin J, Zheng P, Wang X (2024) Product redesign and innovation based on online reviews: A multistage combined search method. INFORMS J. Comput. 36(3):742–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudin C (2019) Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(5):206–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi L, Lin J, Liu G (2023) Product feature extraction from Chinese online reviews: Application to product improvement. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 57(3):1125–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh SN, Sarraf T (2020) Sentiment analysis of a product based on user reviews using random forests algorithm. 2020 10th Internat. Conf. Cloud Computing, Data Sci. Engrg. (Confluence) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 112–116.Google Scholar
• Sisodia A, Burnap A, Kumar V (2022) Automatically discovering visual product characteristics.Google Scholar
• Son Y, Kim W (2023) Development of methodology for classification of user experience (UX) in online customer review. J. Retailing Consumer Services 71:103210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Syamala M, Nalini NJ (2020) A filter based improved decision tree sentiment classification model for real-time amazon product review data. Internat. J. Intelligent Engrg. Systems 13(1):191–202.Google Scholar
• Timoshenko A, Hauser JR (2019) Identifying customer needs from user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 38(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Wardani APP, Adiwijaya A, Purbolaksono MD (2022) Sentiment analysis on beauty product review using modified balanced random forest method and chi-square. J. Inform. System Res. 4(1):1–7.Google Scholar
• Wei CP, Chen YM, Yang CS, Yang CC (2010) Understanding what concerns consumers: A semantic approach to product feature extraction from consumer reviews. Inform. Systems E-Bus. Management 8:149–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang B, Liu Y, Liang Y, Tang M (2019) Exploiting user experience from online customer reviews for product design. Internat. J. Inform. Management 46:173–186.Google Scholar
• Zhan Y, Tan KH, Huo B (2019) Bridging customer knowledge to innovative product development: A data mining approach. Internat. J. Production Res. 57(20):6335–6350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Chu X, Xue D (2019) Identification of the to-be-improved product features based on online reviews for product redesign. Internat. J. Production Res. 57(8):2464–2479.Crossref, Google Scholar