What Do Shareholders Want? Consumer Welfare and the Objective of the Firm

References

• Agrawal AK (2012) Corporate governance objectives of labor union shareholders: Evidence from proxy voting. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(1):187–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Yellen JL (1985) A near-rational model of the business cycle, with wage and price inertia. Quart. J. Econom. 100:823–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aladangady A, Bricker J, Chang AC, Goodman S, Krimmel J, Moore KB, Reber S, Volz AH, Windle RA (2023) Changes in U.S. family finances from 2019 to 2022: Evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Report, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Alchian AA (1950) Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. J. Political Econom. 58(3):211–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Montanari G, Ozaltun B, Tan B (2026) An economic view of corporate social impact. J. Finance 81(1):285–328.Google Scholar
• Antón M, Ederer F, Giné M, Schmalz M (2023) Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. J. Political Econom. 131(5):1294–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J, Vives X (2021) General equilibrium oligopoly and ownership structure. Econometrica 89(3):999–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J, Schmalz MC, Tecu I (2018) Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. J. Finance 73(4):1513–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021) Common ownership in America: 1980–2017. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(3):273–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett R, Bubb R (2024) Corporate social responsibility through shareholder governance. Southern California Law Rev. 97(2):417–494.Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L, King A (2022) Corporate sustainability: A model uncertainty analysis of materiality. J. Financial Reporting 7(2):43–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg F, Koelbel JF, Rigobon R (2022) Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Rev. Finance 26(6):1315–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonnefon JF, Landier A, Sastry PR, Thesmar D (2025) The moral preferences of investors: Experimental evidence. J. Financial Econom. 163:103955.Google Scholar
• Broccardo E, Hart O, Zingales L (2022) Exit versus voice. J. Political Econom. 130(12):3101–3145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bubb R, Catan EM (2022) The party structure of mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(6):2839–2878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeAngelo H (1981) Competition and unanimity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(1):18–27.Google Scholar
• Dreze JH (1974) Investment under private ownership: Optimality, equilibrium and stability. Dreze JH, ed. Allocation Under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta PK, Radner R (1999) Profit maximization and the market selection hypothesis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(4):769–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Pellegrino B (2025) A tale of two networks: Common ownership and product market rivalry. Rev. Econom. Stud., rdaf057.Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J. Financial Econom. 101(3):621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Flammer C, Glossner S (2023) Diversity, equity, and inclusion. NBER Working Paper No. 31215, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ericson KMM (2014) Consumer inertia and firm pricing in the Medicare PART D prescription drug insurance exchange. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 6(1):38–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (1985) Owner-consumers and efficiency. Econom. Lett. 19(4):303–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher I (1930) The Theory of Interest: As Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Kariv S, Markovits D (2007) Individual preferences for giving. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1858–1876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey M, Ponthière G (2023) The stakeholder corporation and social welfare. J. Political Econom. 131(9):2556–2594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times (September 13), https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Leigh A, Schmalz M, Triggs A (2019) Inequality and market concentration, when shareholding is more skewed than consumption. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 35(3):550–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1979) A theory of competitive equilibrium in stock market economies. Econometrica 47(2):293–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haber S, Kepler JD, Larcker DF, Seru A, Tayan B (2022) ESG investing: What shareholders do fund managers represent? Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 4267270, Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Hart O, Zingales L (2017) Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. J. Law Finance Accounting 2(2):247–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD, Zingales L (2022) The new corporate governance. The University of Chicago Business Law Review, vol. 1, no. 1 (The University of Chicago, Business Law Review, Chicago), 195–216.Google Scholar
• Hartzmark SM, Sussman AB (2019) Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. J. Finance 74(6):2789–2837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heeb F, Kölbel JF, Paetzold F, Zeisberger S (2023) Do investors care about impact? Rev. Financial Stud. 36(5):1737–1787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiller JS (2013) The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 118(2):287–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirst S, Kastiel K, Kricheli-Katz T (2023) How much do investors care about social responsibility? Wisconsin Law Rev. 2023(3):977–1040.Google Scholar
• Karpoff JM, Schonlau R, Suzuki K (2021) Shareholder perks and firm value. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(12):5676–5722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Rev. 91(6):1697–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Literature 50(1):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(4):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magill M, Quinzii M, Rochet JC (2015) A theory of the stakeholder corporation. Econometrica 83(5):1685–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1982) Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis. Econometrica 50(2):443–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montagnes BP, Peskowitz Z, Sridharan SA (2025) How well do voting choice policies represent public and investor preferences? Preprint, submitted March 4, https://ssrn.com/abstract=5093097.Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Tumlinson J (2019) Corporate provision of public goods. Management Sci. 65(10):4489–4504.Link, Google Scholar
• Ottoni-Wilhelm M, Vesterlund L, Xie H (2017) Why do people give? Testing pure and impure altruism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3617–3633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Planer-Friedrich L, Sahm M (2020) Strategic corporate social responsibility, imperfect competition, and market concentration. J. Econom. 129(1):79–101.Google Scholar
• Pollard MS, Baird MD (2017) The RAND American life panel: Technical description. Technical report, RAND Corporation, Santa, Monica, CA.Google Scholar
• Radner R (1974) A note on unanimity of stockholders’ preferences among alternative production plans: A reformulation of the Ekern-Wilson model. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 5(1):181–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renneboog L, Szilagyi PG (2011) The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance. J. Corporate Finance 17(1):167–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl A, Smeets P (2017) Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds? J. Finance 72(6):2505–2550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg J (1984) Financial transaction costs and industrial performance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ (2014) Models of caring, or acting as if one cared, about the welfare of others. Annual Rev. Econom. 6(1):129–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalz MC (2018) Common-ownership concentration and corporate conduct. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 10(1):413–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988) Value maximization and the acquisition process. J. Econom. Perspect. 2(1):7–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stout LA (2008) Why we should stop teaching Dodge v. Ford. Virginia Law Bus. Rev. 3(1):163–176.Google Scholar
• Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1992) Strategic models of entry deterrence. Aumann RJ, Hart S, eds. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Handbooks in Economics, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 305–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wirl F, Feichtinger G, Kort PM (2013) Individual firm and market dynamics of CSR activities. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 86:169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2010) Shareholder voting and corporate governance. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 2(1):103–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zytnick J (2022) Do mutual funds represent individual investors? NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 21-04, New York University, New York.Google Scholar