Relatively Robust Multicriteria Decisions

References

• Apostol TM (1974) Mathematical Analysis, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ, Enthoven AC (1961) Quasi-concave programming. Econometrica 29(4):779–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aubin J-P, Frankowska H (1990) Set-Valued Analysis (Birkhäuser, Boston).Google Scholar
• Baker N, Freeland J (1975) Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods. Management Sci. 21(10):1164–1175.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-David S, Borodin A (1994) A new measure for the study of on-line algorithms. Algorithmica 11(1):73–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, den Hertog D, Waegenaere AD, Melenberg B, Rennen G (2013) Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Management Sci. 59(2):341–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Bentley JL, Clarkson KL, Levine DB (1993) Fast linear expected-time algorithms for computing maxima and convex hulls. Algorithmica 9(2):168–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berbel J, Bournaris T, Manos B, Matsatsinis N, Viaggi D, eds. (2018) Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture: Current Trends and Recent Applications (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berge C (1963) Topological Spaces (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK).Google Scholar
• Bertsekas DP (1995) Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, vol. 1 (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
• Blanchet J, Murthy K (2019) Quantifying distributional model risk via optimal transport. Math. Oper. Res. 44(2):565–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Boltzmann L (1871) Über das Wärmegleichgewicht zwischen mehratomigen Gasmolekülen. Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 63(3):397–418.Google Scholar
• Bridle JS (1990) Probabilistic interpretation of feedforward classification network outputs, with relationships to statistical pattern recognition. Fogelman Soulié F, Hérault J, eds. Neurocomputing: Algorithms, Architectures and Applications, NATO ASI Series, vol. 68 (Springer, New York), 227–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronstein EM (2008) Approximation of convex sets by polytopes. J. Math. Sci. 153(6):727–762. [Translation of Russian original, which appeared in Sovremennaya Matematika / Fundamental’nye Napravleniya (Contemporary Mathematics / Fundamental Directions), Vol. 22, Geometry, 2007.]Google Scholar
• Buxton MJ (2005) How much are health-care systems prepared to pay to produce QALY? Eur. J. Health Econom. 6(4):285–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, vol. 1 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO (1955) Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Sci. 1(2):138–151.Link, Google Scholar
• Cournot A (1838) Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses (Hachette, Paris).Google Scholar
• Cutler DM, Richardson E (1997) Measuring the health of the U.S. population. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity Microeconom. 28(1997):217–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• DeNisi AS, Murphy KR (2017) Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):421–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edgeworth FY (1881) Mathematical Psychics (C. Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Edgeworth FY (1897) La teoria pura del monopolio. Giornale degli Economisti 15(Anno 8):13–31.Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M (2010) Multicriteria Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik (Part II) (Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig, Germany).Google Scholar
• Gabow HN, Bentley JL, Tarjan RE (1984) Scaling and related techniques for geometry problems. Proc. 16th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 135–143.Google Scholar
• Gibbs JW (1902) Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics (General Publishing, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Goel A, Meyerson A, Weber TA (2009) Fair welfare maximization. Econom. Theory 41(3):465–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall NG, Long DZ, Qi J, Sim M (2015) Managing underperformance risk in project portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 63(3):660–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Han J, Weber TA (2023) Price discrimination with robust beliefs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 306(2):795–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G (1934) Inequalities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Political Econom. 63(4):309–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins TR, Gausen OM, Strømman AH (2012) Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles: A review. Internat. J. Life Cycle Assessment 17(8):997–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Chen Z (2020) A standard-based approach for multi-criteria performance evaluation of engineered systems. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 202(107001):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Amer. Psychologist 39(4):341–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimya M (2018) Choice, consideration sets, and attribute filters. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 10(4):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klarman HE, Francis JOS, Rosenthal GD (1968) Cost effectiveness analysis applied to the treatment of chronic renal disease. Medical Care 6(1):48–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov AN (1930) Sur la notion de la moyenne. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali Rendiconti 12(9):388–391.Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P, Yu G (1997) Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kung H, Luccio F, Preparata F (1975) On finding the maxima of a set of vectors. J. ACM 22(4):469–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econom. 74(2):132–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leontief WW (1941) The Structure of American Economy 1919–1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lo AW, Zhang R (2024) Quantifying the impact of impact investing. Management Sci. 70(10):7161–7186.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Thompson L, Bazerman MH (1989) Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(3):426–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1890) Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Masri H, Pérez-Gladish B, Zopounidis C, eds. (2018) Financial Decision Aid Using Multiple Criteria: Recent Models and Applications (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM, Wakker PP, Bleichrodt H, Peters HJM (1998) The zero-condition: A simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Sci. 44(6):839–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Mohajerin Esfahani P, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1–2):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagumo M (1930) Über eine Klasse der Mittelwerte. Japanese J. Math. 7:71–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nathan BR, Lord RG (1983) Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 68(1):102–114.Google Scholar
• Nemhauser GL, Wolsey LA (1999) Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley Interscience, New York).Google Scholar
• Newhouse JP (2021) An ounce of prevention. J. Econom. Perspect. 35(2):101–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pareto V (1894) Il massimo di utilità dato dalla libera concorrenza. Giornale degli Economisti 9(2):48–66.Google Scholar
• Pareto V (1897) Cours d’Économie Politique, vol. 2 (F. Rouge, Lausanne, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Pareto V (1906) Manuale di Economia Politica (Società Editrice Libraria, Milan).Google Scholar
• Pliskin JS (1974) The management of patients with end-stage renal failure: A decision-theoretic approach. Doctoral thesis, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Pliskin JS, Beck CH (1976) A health index for patient selection: A value function approach with application to chronic renal failure patients. Management Sci. 22(9):1009–1021.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravindran AR, ed. (2016) Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management (CRC Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudin W (1976) Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1951) The theory of statistical decision. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 46(253):55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider R (2014) Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Sleator DD, Tarjan RE (1985) Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules. Comm. ACM 28(2):202–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steuer RE (1986) Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Stewart TJ (1991) A multi-criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42(1):17–26.Google Scholar
• Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, et al. (2009) Beneficial biofuels: The food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325(5938):270–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villani C (2008) Optimal Transport: Old and New, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 338 (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Wald A (1945) Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann. Math. 46(2):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Fu Y (2020) Constructing composite indicators with individual judgements and best-worst method. Soc. Indicators Res. 149(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson B (1968) The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Weber EH (1846) Der Tastsinn und das Gemeingefühl. Wagner R, ed. Handwörterbuch der Physiologie mit Rücksicht auf die physiologische Pathologie, vol. 3, section 2 (Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany), 481–588.Google Scholar
• Weber TA (2014) On the (non-)equivalence of IRR and NPV. J. Math. Econom. 52:25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber TA (2023) Relatively robust decisions. Theory Decision 94(1):35–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber TA (2024) Optimal depth of discharge for electric batteries with robust capacity-shrinkage estimator. Proc. 2024 4th Internat. Conf. Smart Grid Renewable Energy (SGRE) (IEEE, New York), 1–5.Google Scholar
• Weber TA (2025) Monopoly pricing with unknown demand. Scandinavian J. Econom. 127(1):235–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Energy Council (2024) World Energy Trilemma 2024: Evolving with resilience and justice. Technical report, World Energy Council, London.Google Scholar
• Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 18(1):183–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y (2002) Optimization over the efficient set: Overview. J. Global Optim. 22(1–4):285–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2010) On the relation between compromise programming and ordered weighted averaging operator. Inform. Sci. 180(11):2239–2248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeleny M (1974) A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Comput. Oper. Res. 1(3):479–496.Crossref, Google Scholar