Health Shocks and Annuity Choices

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00682

References

  • Agnew JR, Anderson LR, Gerlach JR, Szykman LR (2008) Who chooses annuities? An experimental investigation of the role of gender, framing, and defaults. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):418–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmad FB, Anderson RN (2021) The leading causes of death in the us for 2020. JAMA 325(18):1829–1830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmad AS, Ormiston-Smith N, Sasieni PD (2015) Trends in the lifetime risk of developing cancer in Great Britain: Comparison of risk for those born from 1930 to 1960. British J. Cancer 112(5):943–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreotti C, Root JC, Ahles TA, McEwen BS, Compas BE (2015) Cancer, coping, and cognition: A model for the role of stress reactivity in cancer-related cognitive decline. Psychooncology 24(6):617–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkeson A, Irie M (2020) Understanding 100 years of the evolution of top wealth shares in the US: What is the role of family firms? NBER Working Paper No. 27465, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Bateman H, Eckert C, Iskhakov F, Louviere J, Satchell S, Thorp S (2017) Default and naive diversification heuristics in annuity choice. Australian J. Management 42(1):32–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bello P, Brugiavini A, Galasso V (2024) Annuity puzzle: Evidence from a Swiss pension fund. J. Risk Insurance 91(3):653–696.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S, Previtero A, Thaler RH (2011) Annuitization puzzles. J. Econom. Perspective 25(4):143–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD (1991) How strong are bequest motives? Evidence based on estimates of the demand for life insurance and annuities. J. Political Econom. 99(5):899–927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC (2009) The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes. Brown J, Liebman J, Wise DA, eds. Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 167–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JR (2003) Redistribution and insurance: Mandatory annuitization with mortality heterogeneity. J. Risk Insurance 70(1):17–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JR (2009) Financial education and annuities. OECD J. 2008(3):173–215.Google Scholar
  • Brown JR, Nijman T (2012) 10 opportunities for improving pension wealth decumulation in the Netherlands. Bovenberg L, van Ewijk C, Westerhout E, eds. The Future of Multi-Pillar Pensions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 330–370.Google Scholar
  • Brown JR, Kling JR, Mullainathan S, Wrobel MV (2008) Why don’t people insure late-life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):304–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JR, Mitchell OS, Poterba JM, Warshawsky MJ (2001) The Role of Annuity Markets in Financing Retirement (The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brunnermeier MK, Nagel S (2008) Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals’ asset allocation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):713–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bütler M, Teppa F (2007) The choice between an annuity and a lump sum: Results from Swiss pension funds. J. Public Econom. 91(10):1944–1966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bütler M, Staubli S, Zito MG (2013) How much does annuity demand react to a large price change? Scandinavian J. Econom. 115(3):808–824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chalmers J, Reuter J (2012) How do retirees value life annuities? Evidence from public employees. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2601–2634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A (2003) Optimal defaults. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):180–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen A, Siegelman P (2010) Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. J. Risk Insurance 77(1):39–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cutler DM, Zeckhauser RJ (1998) Adverse selection in health insurance. Forum Health Econom. Policy 1(1):1–33.Google Scholar
  • Cutler DM, Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2008) Preference heterogeneity and insurance markets: Explaining a puzzle of insurance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):157–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidoff T, Brown JR, Diamond PA (2005) Annuities and individual welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1573–1590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Bresser J, Knoef M (2025) Different defaults affect different groups differently. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 231:106876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debiasi E, Dribe M, BreaMartinez G (2024) Has it always paid to be rich? Income and cause-specific mortality in southern Sweden 1905–2014. Population Stud. (Cambridge) 78(2):181–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Wagner LJ (2007) Cancer survivorship and identity among long-term survivors. Cancer Investigation 25(8):758–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeMeza D, Webb DC (2001) Advantageous selection in insurance markets. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):249–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Døskeland T, Kvaerner JS (2022) Cancer and portfolio choice: Evidence from Norwegian register data. Rev. Finance 26(2):407–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Einav L, Finkelstein A, Schrimpf P (2010) Optimal mandates and the welfare cost of asymmetric information: Evidence from the UK annuity market. Econometrica 78(3):1031–1092.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellis C, Jaspersen J (2025) Selection through lapsation in life insurance markets. Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  • Fang H, Wu Z (2018) Multidimensional private information, market structure, and insurance markets. RAND J. Econom. 49(3):751–787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finegood ED, Briley DA, Turiano NA, Freedman A, South SC, Krueger RF, Miller GE (2021) Association of wealth with longevity in US adults at midlife. JAMA Health Forum 2(7):e211652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2006) Multiple dimensions of private information: Evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):938–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2004) Adverse selection in insurance markets: Policyholder evidence from the UK annuity market. J. Political Econom. 112(1):183–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman BM, Warshawsky MJ (1990) The cost of annuities: Implications for saving behavior and bequests. Quart. J. Econom. 105(1):135–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong G, Webb A (2010) Evaluating the advanced life deferred annuity—An annuity people might actually buy. Insurance Math. Econom. 46(1):210–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagen J (2015) The determinants of annuitization: Evidence from Sweden. Internat. Tax Public Finance 22(4):549–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagen J (2022) Partial recall: Differences between actual and self-reported annuitization decisions in Sweden. J. Pension Econom. Finance 21(3):375–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagen J, Hallberg D, Sjögren-Lindquist G (2022) A nudge to quit? The effect of a change in pension information on annuitisation, labour supply and retirement choices among older workers. Econom. J. 132(643):1060–1094.Google Scholar
  • Härter M, Reuter K, Aschenbrenner A, Schretzmann B, Marschner N, Hasenburg A, Weis J (2001) Psychiatric disorders and associated factors in cancer: Results of an interview study with patients in inpatient, rehabilitation and outpatient treatment. Eur. J. Cancer (1965) 37(11):1385–1393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horneff V, Maurer R, Mitchell OS (2020) Putting the pension back in 401 (k) retirement plans: Optimal versus default deferred longevity income annuities. J. Banking Finance 114:105783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horneff V, Maurer R, Mitchell OS (2025) Defaulting 401 (k) assets into payout annuities for “pretty good” lifetime incomes. NBER Working Paper No. 33915, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Horneff WJ, Maurer RH, Mitchell OS, Dus I (2008) Following the rules: Integrating asset allocation and annuitization in retirement portfolios. Insurance Math. Econom. 42(1):396–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosseini R (2015) Adverse selection in the annuity market and the role for social security. J. Political Econom. 123(4):941–984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurwitz A, Sade O (2020) An investigation of time preferences, life expectancy, and annuity versus lump sum choices: Can smoking harm long-term saving decisions? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 180:812–825.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurwitz A, Sade O (2025) Is one plus one always two? Insuring longevity risk while having multiple savings accounts. Management Sci. 71(5):4474–4494.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hurwitz A, Sade O, Winter E (2020) Unintended consequences of minimum annuity laws: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 169:208–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Illanes G, Padi M (2019) Retirement policy and annuity market equilibria: Evidence from Chile. NBER Working Paper No. 26285, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Inkmann J, Lopes P, Michaelides A (2011) How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle? Rev. Financial Stud. 24(1):279–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jachimowicz JM, Duncan S, Weber EU, Johnson EJ (2018) When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behav. Public Policy 3(2):159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotlikoff LJ, Spivak A (1981) The family as an incomplete annuities market. J. Political Econom. 89(2):372–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotlikoff LJ, Shoven J, Spivak A (1986) The effect of annuity insurance on savings and inequality. J. Labor Econom. 4(3, Part 2):S183–S207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larrain B, Previtero A, Severino F (2025) Annuities and endogenous longevity. Working paper, Escuela de Administración, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  • Lockwood LM (2012) Bequest motives and the annuity puzzle. Rev. Econom. Dynamics 15(2):226–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madrian BC, Shea DF (2001) The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401 (k) participation and savings behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1149–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallet J, Huillard O, Goldwasser F, Dubertret C, LeStrat Y (2018) Mental disorders associated with recent cancer diagnosis: Results from a nationally representative survey. Eur. J. Cancer (1965) 105:10–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCarthy D, Mitchell OS (2010) International adverse selection in life insurance and annuities. Tuljapurkar S, Ogawa N, Gauthier AH, eds. Ageing in Advanced Industrial States: Riding the Age Waves - Volume 3 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht), 119–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGarry K (2022) Perceptions of mortality. Mitchell OS, ed. New Models for Managing Longevity Risk: Public-Private Partnerships (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 11–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell OS, Poterba JM, Warshawsky MJ, Brown JR (1999) New evidence on the money’s worth of individual annuities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1299–1318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murthi M, Orszag J, Orszag P (2000) Annuity costs in the UK. Pensions Internat. J. 5:225–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Dea C, Sturrock D (2023) Survival pessimism and the demand for annuities. Rev. Econom. Statist. 105(3):703–718.Google Scholar
  • Patel A (2020) Benign vs malignant tumors. JAMA Oncology 6(9):1488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reichling F, Smetters K (2015) Optimal annuitization with stochastic mortality and correlated medical costs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(11):3273–3320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild CG (2009) Adverse selection in annuity markets: Evidence from the British life annuity act of 1808. J. Public Econom. 93(5–6):776–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sada A, Yamashita TS, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Thompson GB, Lyden ML, McKenzie TJ (2021) Comparison of benign and malignant insulinoma. Amer. J. Surgery 221(2):437–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru JS, Rawla P, Barsouk A (2021) Epidemiology of melanoma. Medical Sci. 9(4):63.Google Scholar
  • Sheshinski E (2008) The Economic Theory of Annuities (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein KD, Syrjala KL, Andrykowski MA (2008) Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer 112(S11):2577–2592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuo JY, Bi JH, Yuan HY, Jiang YF, Ji XW, Li HL, Xiang YB (2022) Trends of stomach cancer survival: A systematic review of survival rates from population-based cancer registration. J. Digestion Disease 23(1):22–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unger F, Steul-Fischer M, Gatzert N (2024) How default effects and decision timing affect annuity uptake and health consciousness. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance-Issues Practice 49(1):180–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Marle W (2013) Annuity market participation in the Netherlands. MSc thesis, University of Groningen Faculty of Economics and Business MSc Economics and MSc Finance.Google Scholar
  • Yaari ME (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Rev. Econom. Stud. 32(2):137–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.