Political Polarization and Nonmarket Strategy over the Policy Life Cycle
References
- (2010) Spread of (mis) information in social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):194–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):339–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):7–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Private politics. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):31–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The industrial organization of private politics. Quart. J. Political Sci. 7(2):135–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Business and Its Environment, 7th ed. (Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ), 747.Google Scholar
- (2014) Self-regulation in private and public politics. Quart. J. Political Sci. 9(2):231–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):599–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(4):048301.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1962) Applied Dynamic Programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Tax-exempt lobbying: Corporate philanthropy as a tool for political influence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2065–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) A typology of issue evolution. Bus. Soc. 32(1):18–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Rev. Econom. Statist. 106(2):557–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resources Energy Econom. 30(4):509–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Social activism in and around organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):671–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The rise of NGO activism. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 11(4):183–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The structure and conduct of corporate lobbying: How firms lobby the Federal Communications Commission. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):91–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Why your company may need a chief external officer. Organ. Dynamics 43(2):96–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Kicking ash: Who (or what) is winning the “war on coal”? Production Oper. Management 30(7):2162–2187.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The Business of America is Lobbying (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management J. 27(8):765–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Private politics and public regulation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(4):1652–1682.Google Scholar
- (2024) Party system ideological polarization in Western Europe: Data, trends, drivers, and links with other key party system properties (1945–2021). Political Res. Exchange 6(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Politics 50(1):62–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Political polarization in the American public. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 11(1):563–588. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Activist protest spillovers into the regulatory domain: Theory and evidence from the US nuclear power generation industry. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1163–1187.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Pricing by the firm under regulatory threat. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):1089–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1287–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A Modigliani-Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility. BE J. Econom. Anal. Policy 5(1).Google Scholar
- (2001) Special Interest Politics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2013) A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media 7(1):215–224.Google Scholar
- (2020) Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2018) Salience games: Private politics when public attention is limited. J. Environ. Econom. Management 88(C):396–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and US oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Corporate political strategies: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
- (2014) Does national culture impact consumer boycott prevalence? A multi-country study. Eur. J. Internat. Management 8(2):41–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategy in regulated industries. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):521–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Safe bets, long shots, and toss-ups: Strategic engagements between activists and firms. Management Sci. 70(11):7443–7462.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 22(1):129–146. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Party polarization and legislative gridlock. Political Res. Quart. 54(1):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Campaign contributions facilitate access to congressional officials: A randomized field experiment. Amer. J. Political Sci. 60(3):545–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Corporate political activity, reimagined: Revisiting the political marketplace. J. Management 49(6):1911–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):6–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Voteview: Congressional roll-call votes database. Accessed November 15, 2025, https://voteview.com/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Consensus, polarization and clustering of opinions in social networks. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 31(6):1072–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Remaking capitalism: The strength of weak legislation in mobilizing B corporation certification. Acad. Management J. 65(3):958–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Astroturf: Interest group lobbying and corporate strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13(4):561–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J. Econom. Management Strategy 20(1):3–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Does private regulation preempt public regulation? Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 113(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. J. Law Econom. 43(2):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Firm Commitment: Why the Corporation Is Failing Us and How to Restore Trust in It (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
- (2016) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 272.Google Scholar
- (2024) How global companies handle political talk at work. BBC (May 9), https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20240508-how-global-companies-handle-political-talk-at-work.Google Scholar
- (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The new stakeholder theory on organizational purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):245–255.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(6):1628–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury Publishing, London).Google Scholar
- (2023) The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market (Bloomsbury Publishing, London).Google Scholar
- (2008) Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):773–775. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) “MOB” mentality?: On the formation and consequences of moralized opinion-based intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print July 18, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Employees’ response to corporate greenwashing. Bus. Strategy Environ. 32(7):4015–4027.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Losing Control?: Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2022) Advancing reform: Embedded activism to develop climate solutions. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1775–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Beyond coal: When can outsider stakeholders drive transformative change? Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4):659–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for environmental protection? J. Environ. Econom. Management 36(2):109–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) On buying legislatures. Econom. Politics 3(2):93–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The stages of the policy process and the equal rights amendment, 1972–1982. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(6):1871–1909.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) The management of socio‐political issues and environments: Toward a research agenda for corporate socio‐political engagement. J. Management Stud. 61(2):277–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Sci. 61(8):1989–2011.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) How context matters in non‐market strategies: Exploring variations in corporate social responsibility‐political activity relationships. J. Management Stud. 61(7):3358–3388.Google Scholar

