Political Polarization and Nonmarket Strategy over the Policy Life Cycle

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00819

References

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, ParandehGheibi A (2010) Spread of (mis) information in social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):194–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aragòn-Correa JA, Marcus AA, Vogel D (2020) The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):339–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):7–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP (2003) Private politics. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):31–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP (2012) The industrial organization of private politics. Quart. J. Political Sci. 7(2):135–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP (2013) Business and Its Environment, 7th ed. (Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ), 747.Google Scholar
  • Baron DP (2014) Self-regulation in private and public politics. Quart. J. Political Sci. 9(2):231–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP, Diermeier D (2007) Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):599–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann F, Lorenz-Spreen P, Sokolov IM, Starnini M (2020) Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(4):048301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellman RE, Dreyfus SE (1962) Applied Dynamic Programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Fisman R, Trebbi F (2020) Tax-exempt lobbying: Corporate philanthropy as a tool for political influence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2065–2102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigelow B, Fahey L, Mahon J (1993) A typology of issue evolution. Bus. Soc. 32(1):18–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonardi JP, Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boxell L, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2024) Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Rev. Econom. Statist. 106(2):557–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2008) Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resources Energy Econom. 30(4):509–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briscoe F, Gupta A (2016) Social activism in and around organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):671–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daubanes J, Rochet JC (2019) The rise of NGO activism. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 11(4):183–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Figueiredo JM, Tiller EH (2001) The structure and conduct of corporate lobbying: How firms lobby the Federal Communications Commission. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):91–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doh JP, Lawton TC, Rajwani T, Paroutis S (2014) Why your company may need a chief external officer. Organ. Dynamics 43(2):96–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorobantu S, Kaul A, Zelner B (2017) Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drake DF, York JG (2021) Kicking ash: Who (or what) is winning the “war on coal”? Production Oper. Management 30(7):2162–2187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drutman L (2015) The Business of America is Lobbying (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley C, Lenox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management J. 27(8):765–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egorov G, Harstad B (2017) Private politics and public regulation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(4):1652–1682.Google Scholar
  • Emanuele V, Marino B (2024) Party system ideological polarization in Western Europe: Data, trends, drivers, and links with other key party system properties (1945–2021). Political Res. Exchange 6(1):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans P (1997) The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Politics 50(1):62–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ (2008) Political polarization in the American public. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 11(1):563–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fremeth AR, Holburn GL, Piazza A (2022) Activist protest spillovers into the regulatory domain: Theory and evidence from the US nuclear power generation industry. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1163–1187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer A, McMillan H (1992) Pricing by the firm under regulatory threat. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):1089–1099.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golub B, Jackson MO (2012) How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1287–1338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graff Zivin J, Small A (2005) A Modigliani-Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility. BE J. Econom. Anal. Policy 5(1).Google Scholar
  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (2001) Special Interest Politics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Guerra P, Meira W Jr, Cardie C, Kleinberg R (2013) A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media 7(1):215–224.Google Scholar
  • Hetherington MJ, Rudolph TJ (2020) Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Heyes A, Lyon TP, Martin S (2018) Salience games: Private politics when public attention is limited. J. Environ. Econom. Management 88(C):396–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Grandy JB, Lee BH (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and US oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Keim G, Schuler DA (2004) Corporate political strategies: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
  • Hoffmann S (2014) Does national culture impact consumer boycott prevalence? A multi-country study. Eur. J. Internat. Management 8(2):41–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holburn GL, VandenBergh RG (2008) Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategy in regulated industries. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):521–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holburn GL, Maxwell JW, Bonardi JP (2024) Safe bets, long shots, and toss-ups: Strategic engagements between activists and firms. Management Sci. 70(11):7443–7462.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 22(1):129–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones DR (2001) Party polarization and legislative gridlock. Political Res. Quart. 54(1):125–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalla JL, Broockman DE (2016) Campaign contributions facilitate access to congressional officials: A randomized field experiment. Amer. J. Political Sci. 60(3):545–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katic IV, Hillman A (2023) Corporate political activity, reimagined: Revisiting the political marketplace. J. Management 49(6):1911–1938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2019) Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):6–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis JB, Poole K, Rosenthal H, Boche A, Rudkin A, Sonnet L (2022) Voteview: Congressional roll-call votes database. Accessed November 15, 2025, https://voteview.com/.Google Scholar
  • Li L, Scaglione A, Swami A, Zhao Q (2013) Consensus, polarization and clustering of opinions in social networks. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 31(6):1072–1083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas DS, Grimes MG, Gehman J (2022) Remaking capitalism: The strength of weak legislation in mobilizing B corporation certification. Acad. Management J. 65(3):958–987.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2004) Astroturf: Interest group lobbying and corporate strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13(4):561–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2011) Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J. Econom. Management Strategy 20(1):3–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra N, Monin B, Tomz M (2019) Does private regulation preempt public regulation? Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 113(1):19–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. J. Law Econom. 43(2):583–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer C (2013) Firm Commitment: Why the Corporation Is Failing Us and How to Restore Trust in It (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • McCarty N, Poole KT, Rosenthal H (2016) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 272.Google Scholar
  • McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza E (2024) How global companies handle political talk at work. BBC (May 9), https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20240508-how-global-companies-handle-political-talk-at-work.Google Scholar
  • McDonnell MH, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan AM (2023) The new stakeholder theory on organizational purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):245–255.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer DS, Staggenborg S (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(6):1628–1660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oreskes N, Conway EM (2011) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury Publishing, London).Google Scholar
  • Oreskes N, Conway EM (2023) The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market (Bloomsbury Publishing, London).Google Scholar
  • Palazzo G, Scherer AG (2008) Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):773–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Hedden LN, Khan H (2025) “MOB” mentality?: On the formation and consequences of moralized opinion-based intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print July 18, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson JL, Montgomery AW, Ozbilir T (2023) Employees’ response to corporate greenwashing. Bus. Strategy Environ. 32(7):4015–4027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sassen S (1996) Losing Control?: Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schifeling T, Soderstrom S (2022) Advancing reform: Embedded activism to develop climate solutions. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1775–1803.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schifeling T, Lyon T, Vasi I (2025) Beyond coal: When can outsider stakeholders drive transformative change? Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer R (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4):659–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segerson K, Miceli TJ (1998) Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for environmental protection? J. Environ. Econom. Management 36(2):109–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder JM Jr (1991) On buying legislatures. Econom. Politics 3(2):93–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soule SA, King BG (2006) The stages of the policy process and the equal rights amendment, 1972–1982. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(6):1871–1909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun P, Doh J, Rajwani T, Werner T, Luo XR (2024) The management of socio‐political issues and environments: Toward a research agenda for corporate socio‐political engagement. J. Management Stud. 61(2):277–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker ET (2014) Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Werner T (2015) Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Sci. 61(8):1989–2011.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winkler DM, Krzeminska A (2024) How context matters in non‐market strategies: Exploring variations in corporate social responsibility‐political activity relationships. J. Management Stud. 61(7):3358–3388.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.