Willful Ignorance and Moral Behavior

References

• Allcott H, Cohen D, Morrison W, Taubinsky D (2025) When do “nudges” increase welfare? Amer. Econom. Rev. 115(5):1555–1596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experiment. Econom. 9(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastian B, Loughnan S (2017) Resolving the meat-paradox: A motivational account of morally troublesome behavior and its maintenance. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 21(3):278–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell E, Norwood FB, Lusk JL (2017) Are consumers wilfully ignorant about animal welfare? Animal Welfare 26(4):399–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bock O, Baetge I, Nicklisch A (2014) hroot: Hamburg Registration and Organization Online Tool. Eur. Econom. Rev. 71:117–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2022) Salience. Annual Rev. Econom. 14(1):521–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer NT, Hall MG, Noar SM, Parada H, Stein-Seroussi A, Bach LE, Hanley S, Ribisl KM (2016) Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 176(7):905–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breyer B, Bluemke M (2016) Deutsche Version Der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule PANAS (GESIS Panel). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/zis242.Google Scholar
• Cain D, Dana J (2012) Paying people to look at the consequences of their actions. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Cameron CD, Scheffer JA, Hadjiandreou E, Anderson S (2022) Motivated empathic choices. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 66:191–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carneiro P, Heckman JJ, Vytlacil EJ (2011) Estimating marginal returns to education. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2754–2781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen T, Dustmann C, Raute A, Schönberg U (2018) Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance. J. Political Econom. 126(6):2356–2409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber RA, Xi Kuang J (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimant E, Galeotti F, Villeval MC (2024) Motivated information acquisition and social norm formation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 167:104778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Droz B, Buechel B, Capra M, Chen X, Nassar A, Park SG, Xu J, Zhang S, Tasoff J (2025) Appetite for ignorance: Does eating meat cause information avoidance about its harms? Eur. Econom. Rev. 175:105013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• d’Adda G, Gao Y, Golman R, Tavoni M (2024) Strategic information avoidance, belief manipulation and the effectiveness of green nudges. Ecological Econom. 222:108191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel C, Hertwig R (2021) Deliberate ignorance: Present and future. Hertwig R, Engel C, eds. Deliberate Ignorance: Choosing Not to Know, vol. 29 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epperson R, Gerster A (2020) Information preferences and the short and long run effects of information. AEA RCT Registry (November 13), https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5015-1.3.Google Scholar
• Espinosa R, Stoop J (2021) Do people really want to be informed? Ex-ante evaluations of information-campaign effectiveness. Experiment. Econom. 24(4):1131–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa R, Borau S, Treich N (2024) Impact of NGOs’ undercover videos on citizens’ emotions and pro-social behaviors. Sci. Rep. 14(1):20584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2023) Information avoidance and image concerns. Econom. J. 133(656):3153–3168.Google Scholar
• Feiler L (2014) Testing models of information avoidance with binary choice dictator games. J. Econom. Psych. 45:253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freddi E (2021) Do people avoid morally relevant information? Evidence from the refugee crisis. Rev. Econom. Statist. 103(4):605–620.Google Scholar
• Galeotti F, Saucet C, Villeval MC (2020) Unethical amnesia responds more to instrumental than to hedonic motives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(41):25423–25428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome).Google Scholar
• Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G (2017) Information avoidance. J. Econom. Lit. 55(1):96–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Loewenstein G, Molnar A, Saccardo S (2022) The demand for, and avoidance of, information. Management Sci. 68(9):6454–6476.Link, Google Scholar
• Gradidge S, Zawisza M, Harvey AJ, McDermott DT (2021) A structured literature review of the meat paradox. Soc. Psych. Bull. 16(3):e5953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z (2014) Strategic ignorance and the robustness of social preferences. Management Sci. 60(11):2659–2665.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z, van der Weele JJ (2017) Self-image and willful ignorance in social decisions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(1):173–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haaland I, Roth C, Wohlfart J (2023) Designing information provision experiments. J. Econom. Lit. 61(1):3–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagenbach J, Saucet C (2025) Motivated skepticism. Rev. Econom. Stud. 92(3):1882–1919. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handel B, Schwartzstein J (2018) Frictions or mental gaps: What’s behind the information we (don’t) use and when do we care? J. Econom. Perspect. 32(1):155–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Vytlacil E (2001) Policy-relevant treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):107–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hestermann N, Le Yaouanq Y, Treich N (2020) An economic model of the meat paradox. Eur. Econom. Rev. 129:103569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horvat N, Škec S, Martinec T, Lukačević F, Perišić MM (2019) Comparing virtual reality and desktop interface for reviewing 3D CAD models. Proc. Design Society Internat. Conf. Engrg. Design, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1923–1932.Google Scholar
• Huet-Vaughn E, Pham M, Tasoff J, Vivalt E (2024) Moral preferences and the marketplace of ideas. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4984557.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Lit. 47(1):5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kajackaite A (2015) If I close my eyes, nobody will get hurt: The effect of ignorance on performance in a real-effort experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116:518–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenkel DS, Mathios AD, Phillips GN, Suryanarayana R, Wang H, Zeng S (2023) Fear or knowledge the impact of graphic cigarette warnings on tobacco product choices. NBER Working Paper No. 31534, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kunst JR, Hohle SM (2016) Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite 105:758–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson T, Capra CM (2009) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgm. Decision Making 4(6):467–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Wojtowicz Z (2025) The economics of attention. J. Econom. Literature 63(3):1038–1089.Google Scholar
• Loughnan S, Haslam N, Bastian B (2010) The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite 55(1):156–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, Norwood FB (2011) Animal welfare economics. Appl. Econom. Perspect. Policy 33(4):463–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maestas N, Mullen KJ, Strand A (2013) Does disability insurance receipt discourage work? Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects of SSDI receipt. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):1797–1829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathur MB, Peacock J, Reichling DB, Nadler J, Bain PA, Gardner CD, Robinson TN (2021) Interventions to reduce meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: Meta-analysis and evidence-based recommendations. Appetite 164:105277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matthey A, Regner T (2011) Do I really want to know? A cognitive dissonance-based explanation of other-regarding behavior. Games (Basel) 2(1):114–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mol JM (2019) Goggles in the lab: Economic experiments in immersive virtual environments. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 79:155–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Momsen K, Ohndorf M (2020) When do people exploit moral wiggle room? An experimental analysis of information avoidance in a market setup. Ecological Econom. 169:106479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisa CF, Bélanger JJ, Schumpe BM, Faller DG (2019) Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change. Nat. Commun. 10(1):4545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onwezen MC, van der Weele CN (2016) When indifference is ambivalence: Strategic ignorance about meat consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 52:96–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paes D, Arantes E, Irizarry J (2017) Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: Comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems. Autom. Constr. 84:292–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392):987–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1995) Moral preferences, moral constraints, and self-serving biases. Working Paper No. 95-241, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Ed. Psych. 66(5):688–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saccardo S, Serra-Garcia M (2023) Enabling or limiting cognitive flexibility? Evidence of demand for moral commitment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(2):396–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serra-Garcia M, Szech N (2022) The (In)elasticity of moral ignorance. Management Sci. 68(7):4815–4834.Link, Google Scholar
• Shiller RJ (2017) Narrative economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):967–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2016) Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI 3:74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soraperra I, van der Weele J, Villeval MC, Shalvi S (2023) The social construction of ignorance: Experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 138:197–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stefanski LA, Boos DD (2002) The calculus of M-estimation. Amer. Statist. 56(1):29–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vu L, Soraperra I, Leib M, van der Weele J, Shalvi S (2023) Ignorance by choice: A meta-analytic review of the underlying motives of willful ignorance and its consequences. Psych. Bull. 149(9–10):611–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaki J (2014) Empathy: A motivated account. Psych. Bull. 140(6):1608–1647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmermann F (2020) The dynamics of motivated beliefs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):337–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar