Overcoming Deceptive Evasions in Earnings Calls: The Role of Investor Suspicion

References

• Abraham S, Bamber M (2017) The Q&A: Under surveillance. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 58:15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora K (2022) The rise of the retail investor. Forbes (November 4), https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2022/11/04/the-rise-of-the-retail-investor/?sh=17bc5deb1755.Google Scholar
• Asay HS, Hales J (2018) Disclaiming the future: Investigating the impact of cautionary disclaimers on investor judgments before and after experiencing economic loss. Accounting Rev. 93(4):81–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asay HS, Hales J, Hinds C, Rupar K (2023) Nonprofessional investor judgments: Linking dependent measures to constructs. Accounting Rev. 35(3):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamber M, Abraham S (2020) On the “realities” of investor-manager interactivity: Baudrillard, hyperreality, and management Q&A sessions. Contemporary Accounting Res. 37(2):1290–1325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth A, Mansouri S, Wöbbeking F (2023) “Let me get back to you”—A machine learning approach to measuring nonanswers. Management Sci. 69(10):6333–6348.Link, Google Scholar
• Bavelas JB, Black A, Chovil N, Mullett J (1990) Truth, lies, and equivocations. The effects of conflicting goals on discourse. J. Language Soc. Psych. 9:135–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar G, Elaad E (2003) The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 88(1):131–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Ma P, Marinovic I (2020) How often do managers withhold information? Accounting Rev. 95(4):73–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer A, Cohen DA, Lys TZ, Walther BR (2010) The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. J. Accounting Econom. 50(2–3):296–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomberg News (2023) Retail army bets record $1.5 billion on stocks at fastest pace ever, JPMorgan says. Accessed March 17, 2024, https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/retail-army-bets-record-1-5-billion-on-stocks-at-fastest-pace-ever-jpmorgan-says-1.1936269.Google Scholar
• Bobko P (1986) A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions. J. Appl. Psych. 71(2):323–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bobko P, Barelka AJ, Hirshfield LM (2014a) The construct of state-level suspicion: A model and research agenda for automated and information technology (IT) contexts. Human Factors 56(3):489–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bobko P, Barelka AJ, Hirshfield LM, Lyons JB (2014b) Invited article: The construct of suspicion and how it can benefit theories and models in organizational science. J. Bus. Psych. 29(3):335–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Call AC, Clement MB, Sharp NY (2015) Inside the “black box” of sell-side financial analysts. J. Accounting Res. 53(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Call AC, Clement MB, Sharp NY (2019) Managing the narrative: Investor relations officers and corporate disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 67(1):58–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryzgalova S, Pavlova A, Sikorskaya T (2023) Retail trading in options and the rise of the big three wholesalers. J. Finance 78(6):3465–3514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ, Matsumoto DA, Miller GS (2004) Managerial and investor responses to disclosure regulation: The case of Reg FD and conference calls. Accounting Rev. 79(3):617–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cade NL (2018) Corporate social media: How two-way disclosure channels influence investors. Accounting Organ. Soc. 68–69:63–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cade NL, Koonce L, Mendoza KI (2020) Using video to disclose forward-looking information: The effect of nonverbal cues on investors’ judgments. Rev. Accounting Stud. 25(4):1444–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Call AC, Emett SA, Maksymov E, Sharp NY (2022) Meet the press: Survey evidence on financial journalists as information intermediaries. J. Accounting Econom. 73(2–3):101455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell MC, Kirmani A (2000) Consumers’ use of Persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CBS News (2023) Officials dodge questions over Maui wildfire response. Accessed December 15, 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/video/officials-dodge-questions-over-maui-wildfire-response/.Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Nagar V, Schoenfeld J (2018) Manager-analyst conversations in earnings conference calls. Rev. Accounting Stud. 23(4):1315–1354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cision (2017) Shareholder Confidence 365 study. How are investors consuming your investor relations content? Institutional investors v. individual investors comparison. Accessed January 20, 2019, http://e.prnewswire.com/Shareholder-study-365-prn.html.Google Scholar
• Clare DD, Levine TR (2019) Documenting the truth-default: The low frequency of spontaneous unprompted veracity assessments in deception detection. Human Comm. Res. 45(3):286–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clementson DE (2016) Why do we think politicians are so evasive? Insight from theories of equivocation and deception, with a content analysis of U.S. presidential debates, 1996-2012. J. Language Soc. Psych. 35(3):247–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clementson DE (2018a) Effects of dodging questions: How politicians escape deception detection and how they get caught. J. Language Soc. Psych. 37(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clementson DE (2018b) Truth bias and partisan bias in political deception detection. J. Language Soc. Psych. 37(4):407–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clementson D, Eveland WP (2016) When politicians dodge questions: An analysis of presidential press conferences and debates. Mass Comm. Soc. 19(4):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J (2018) Listen in: Musk’s bizarre earnings call was ‘the most unusual’ in this Morgan Stanley analyst’s 20-year career. Accessed March 3, 2021, https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/03/musk-earnings-call-most-unusual-in-morgan-stanley-analysts-career.html.Google Scholar
• DeCarlo TE (2005) The effects of sales message and suspicion of ulterior motives on salesperson evaluation. J. Consumer Psych. 15(3):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dichev I, Graham J, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S (2016) The misrepresentation of earnings. Financial Analysts J. 72(1):22–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekström M (2009) Announced refusal to answer: A study of norms and accountability in broadcast political interviews. Discourse Stud. 11(6):681–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 28(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairbourn M (2023) Why quarterly earnings calls are worth a listen. Accessed May 12, 2023, https://tickertape.tdameritrade.com/investing/insights-from-quarterly-earnings-calls-15152.Google Scholar
• Fein S (1996) Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(6):1164–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fima Z (2023) How investors can get ahead by listening to a company’s earnings conference call. Accessed June 12, 2023, https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/23/how-investors-can-get-ahead-by-listening-to-an-earnings-call.html#.Google Scholar
• Flannelly M (2023) Earnings call: Definition, importance, how to listen. Accessed February 8, 2023, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/what-is-an-earnings-call/.Google Scholar
• Furr RM, Rosenthal R (2003) Evaluating theories efficiently: The nuts and bolts of contrast analysis. Understanding Statist. 2(1):45–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garavaglia S (2023) What’s in a name? Investors’ reactions to non-GAAP labels. Contemporary Accounting Res. 40(2):897–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geer JG (1988) What do open-ended questions measure? Public Opinion Quart. 52(3):365–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT (1991) How mental systems believe. Amer. Psych. 46(2):107–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Krull DS, Malone PS (1990) Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(4):601–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Tafarodi RW, Malone PS (1993) You can’t not believe everything you read. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gow ID, Larcker DF, Zakolyukina AA (2021) Non-answers during conference calls. J. Accounting Res. 59(4):1349–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grice HP (1989) Studies in the Way of Words (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Griffith E (2016) Alphabet earnings: Asked and unanswered. Fortune (April 21), https://fortune.com/2016/04/21/alphabet-earnings-nest/.Google Scholar
• Guggenmos RD, Piercey MD, Agoglia CP (2018) Custom contrast testing: Current trends and a new approach. Accounting Rev. 93(5):223–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartwig M, Bond CF (2011) Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psych. Bull. 137(4):643–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatmaker T (2022) Meta, TikTok, YouTube and Twitter dodge questions on social media and national security. Accessed December 15, 2023, https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/14/meta-tiktok-youtube-and-twitter-senate-hearing/?guccounter=1.Google Scholar
• Hauser DJ, Ellsworth PC, Gonzalez R (2018) Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers Psych. 9:1–10.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2007) Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. J. Comm. 57(4):785–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Heinrichs A, Park J, Soltes EF (2019) Who consumes firm disclosures? Evidence from earnings conference calls. Accounting Rev. 94(3):205–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilton J, Fein S, Miller D (1993) Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 19(5):501–5012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobson JL, Mayew WJ, Venkatachalam M (2012) Analyzing speech to detect financial misreporting. J. Accounting Res. 50(2):349–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobson JL, Mayew WJ, Peecher ME, Venkatachalam M (2017) Improving experienced auditors’ detection of deception in CEO narratives. J. Accounting Res. 55(5):1137–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollander S, Pronk M, Roelofsen E (2010) Does silence speak? An empirical analysis of disclosure choices during conference calls. J. Accounting Res. 48(3):531–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ji Y, Rozenbaum O (2023) Does analyst participation in earnings conference calls curb real activities earnings management? Preprint, submitted November 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4029126.Google Scholar
• Kelly K, Low B, Tan HT, Tan SK (2012) Investors’ reliance on analysts’ stock recommendations and mitigating mechanisms for potential overreliance. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(3):991–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim RK, Levine TR (2011) The effect of suspicion on deception detection accuracy: Optimal level or opposing effects? Comm. Rep. 24(2):51–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimbrough MD (2005) The effect of conference calls on analyst and market underreaction to earnings announcements. Accounting Rev. 80(1):189–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koonce L, Leitter Z, White B (2023) The effect of a warning on investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Rev. Accounting Stud. 28(2):769–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Mizik N, Roychowdhury S (2016) Managing for the moment: The role of earnings management via real activities versus accruals in SEO valuation. Accounting Rev. 91(2):559–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Shu S, Wysocki PD (2009) Do managers withhold bad news. J. Accounting Res. 47(1):241–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krische SD (2019) Investment experience, financial literacy, and investment-related judgments. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(3):1634–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Zakolyukina AA (2012) Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. J. Accounting Res. 50(2):495–540. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J (2016) Can investors detect managers’ lack of spontaneity? Adherence to predetermined scripts during earnings conference calls. Accounting Rev. 91(1):229–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine TR (2014) Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. J. Language Soc. Psych. 33(4):378–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, Mcdonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. J. Finance 66(1):35–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann S, Vrij A, Bull R (2004) Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. J. Appl. Psych. 89(1):137–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumoto D, Pronk M, Roelofsen E (2011) What makes conference calls useful? The information content of managers’ presentations and analysts’ discussion sessions. Accounting Rev. 86(4):1383–1414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayew WJ, Sethuraman M, Venkatachalam M (2020) Individual analysts’ stock recommendations, earnings forecasts, and the informativeness of conference call question and answer sessions. Accounting Rev. 95(6):311–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCornack SA (1992) Information manipulation theory. Comm. Monographs 59(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCornack SA, Levine TR (1990) When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Comm. Monographs 57:219–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCornack SA, Morrison K, Paik JE, Wisner AM, Zhu X (2014) Information manipulation theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. J. Language Soc. Psych. 33(4):348–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meissner CA, Kassin SM (2002) “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law Human Behav. 26(5):469–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mercer M (2004) How do investors assess the credibility of management disclosures? Accounting Horizons 18(3):185–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NIRI (2016) NIRI Earnings Process Practices Research Report (NIRI, Alexandria, VA).Google Scholar
• O’Brien K (2023) Sam Bankman-Fried on trial. Reuters (November 2), https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/sam-bankman-fried-trial-2023-11-02/.Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):867–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overfelt M (2021) What executives are really saying when they dodge questions. Accessed December 14, 2022, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/what-executives-are-really-saying-when-they-dodge-questions.Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PCAOB (2010) Auditing Standard Related to the Auditor’s Assessment of and Response to Risk and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards (PCAOB, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Reinhard MA, Greifeneder R, Scharmach M (2013) Attitudes and social cognition: Unconscious processes improve lie detection. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 105(5):721–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Norton MI (2011) The artful dodger: Answering the wrong question the right way. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 17(2):139–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1985) Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL, Rubin DB (2000) Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosnow RL, Rosenthal R (1995) Some things you learn aren’t so”: Cohen’s paradox, Asch’s paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosnow RL, Rosenthal R (1996) Contrast and interactions redux: Five easy pieces. Psych. Sci. 7(4):253–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotter JB (1967) A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personality 35(4):651–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholz E, Zuell C (2012) Item non-response in open-ended questions: Who does not answer on the meaning of left and right? Soc. Sci. Res. 41:1415–1428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinaceur M (2010) Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(3):543–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sletten E (2012) The effect of stock price on discretionary disclosure. Rev. Accounting Stud. 17(July):96–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strube MJ, Bobko P (1989) Testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions: Simulations and further comments. J. Appl. Psych. 74(2):247–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KA, Clifford S (2017) Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Comput. Human Behav. 77:184–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toris C, DePaulo BM (1985) Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(5):1063–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley A (2023) Optus boss dodges questions over job after Australia-wide outage. Accessed December 15, 2023, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-17/optus-boss-dodges-questions-over-job-after-australia-wide-outage?embedded-checkout=true.Google Scholar
• Yezegel A (2023) The value of eliciting information: Evidence from sell-side analysts. Accounting Rev. 98(3):459–486.Crossref, Google Scholar