The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI
References
- (1999) Getting small: A short history of the personal computer. Proc. IEEE 87(9):1695–1698.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) The simple macroeconomics of AI. Econom. Policy 40(121):13–58.Google Scholar
- (2022) Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. J. Labor Econom. 40(S1):S293–S340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) New technologies and jobs in Europe. Econom. Policy 40(121):71–139.Google Scholar
- (2024) Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. J. Financial Econom. 151:103745.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Why working from home will stick. NBER Working Paper No. 28731, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2023) Employer reallocation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Validation and application of a do-it-yourself CPS. Rev. Econom. Dynamics 49:58–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025a) Heterogeneity in work from home: Evidence from six U.S. datasets. Federal Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 107(14):1–23.Google Scholar
- (2025b) Measuring trends in work from home: Evidence from six U.S. datasets. Federal Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 107(15):1–23.Google Scholar
- (2024) Tracking firm use of AI in real time: A snapshot from the Business Trends and Outlook Survey. NBER Working Paper No. 32319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1995) General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? J. Econom. 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Generative AI at work. Quart. J. Econom. 140(2):889–942.Google Scholar
- (2021) The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. Amer. Econom. J.: Macroeconomics 13(1):333–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The economic potential of generative AI. McKinsey & Company, New York.Google Scholar
- (2024) The effects of generative AI on high skilled work: Evidence from three field experiments with software developers. Preprint, submitted September 5, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4945566.Google Scholar
- (1990) The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):355–361.Google Scholar
- (2023) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 24-013, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2018) Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evidence from job postings for professionals. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S337–S369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1940) On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Ann. Math. Statist. 11(4):427–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Who is AI replacing? The impact of generative AI on online freelancing platforms. Management Sci. 71(10):8097–8108.Link, Google Scholar
- (2025) Shifting work patterns with generative AI. Preprint, submitted April 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11436.Google Scholar
- (2025) Toward a human-AI task tensor: A taxonomy for organizing work in the age of generative AI. Csaszar F, Jia N, eds. Handbook of AI and Strategy (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
- (2023) Generative AI and firm values. Generative AI and firm values. NBER Working Paper No. 31222, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2024) GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs. Science 384(6702):1306–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Articles on datasets. Strategic Management J. 40(5):713–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management J. 42(12):2195–2217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Miracle or myth? Assessing the macroeconomic productivity gains from artificial intelligence. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers No. 29, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
- (2024) What does the public in six countries think of generative AI in news? Report, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, London.Google Scholar
- (2024) AI, task changes in jobs, and worker reallocation. CESifo Working Paper No. 11585, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2025) Which economic tasks are performed with AI? Evidence from millions of Claude conversations. Preprint, submitted February 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04761.Google Scholar
- (2024) The unequal adoption of ChatGPT exacerbates existing inequalities among workers. Econom. Sci. 122(1):e2414972121.Google Scholar
- (2025) Large language models, small labor market effects. NBER Working Paper No. 33777, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2005) General purpose technologies. Aghion P, Durlauf SN, eds. Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1181–1224.Google Scholar
- (2025) AI, skill, and productivity: The case of taxi drivers. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print June 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01631.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Perspectives on the labor share. J. Econom. Perspect. 38(2):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A brief history of the internet. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Comm. Rev. 39(5):22–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Consumers are diving into AI, new data show. Companies are being more cautious. Barron’s (December 9), https://www.barrons.com/articles/ai-chatgpt-usage-rates-77c92acb.Google Scholar
- (2024) Americans’ use of ChatGPT is ticking up, but few trust its election information. Pew Research Center (March 26), https://web.archive.org/web/20240326215539/https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/26/americans-use-of-chatgpt-is-ticking-up-but-few-trust-its-election-information/.Google Scholar
- (2024) AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where. J. Econom. Management Strategy 33(2):375–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 56(1/2):69–75.Google Scholar
- (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381(6654):187–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) The uneven impact of generative AI on entrepreneurial performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2009) Manual for measuring ICT access and use by households and individuals. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.Google Scholar
- (2023) The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from GitHub copilot. Preprint, submitted February 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06590.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2015) Current population survey interviewing material. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/methodology/intman/CPS_Manual_April2015.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2020) The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

