R&D and Global Manufacturing Performance

References

• Allison P. D., Clogg C. C. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology 1990 (1990) (American Sociological Association, Washington, DC) 93–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amber G. H., Amber P. S.Anatomy of Automation (1962) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. L., Stewart M. Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1967) 46(6):71–83Google Scholar
• Baysinger B., Hoskisson R. Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(2):310–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bean Alden S. Why some R&D organizations are more productive than others. Res.-Tech. Management (1995) January–February):25–29Google Scholar
• Berger P. G. Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. J. Accounting Res. (1993) 31(2):131–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billings B. A., McGowan J., Alnajjar F. An inter-country comparison of the research and development tax credit. Accounting Horizons (1994) 8(1):19–34Google Scholar
• Bylinsky G. The digital factory. Fortune (1994) 130(10):50–57Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levin M., Mowery D. Firm size and R&D intensity: A re-examination. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 35(4):543–565Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins P. D., Hage J., Hull F. M. Organizational and technological predictors of change in automaticity. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:512–543Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. J., Furby L. How should we measure “change”—Or should we? Psych. Bull. (1970) 74:68–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta D., Guthrie J. P. Executive succession: Organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(7):569–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J. E., Bridges W. R., O'Keefe R. Organizational strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Sci. (1984) 30(6):682–695Link, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J. E., Penner-Hahn J. Flexibility ratios and manufacturing strategy. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1444–1454Link, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J. E., Reza E. Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(4):795–827Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faltermayer E. Competitiveness: How U.S. companies stack up now. Fortune (1994) April 18):52–64Google Scholar
• Foster R. N.Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage (1986) (Summit Books, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franko L. Global corporate competition: Who's winning who's losing, and the R&D factor in one reason why. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(5):449–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryxell G. Business-level process R&D: Patterns and returns under different generic strategic orientations. Internat. J. Tech. Management (1990) 5(1):41–63Google Scholar
• Graves S. B., Waddock S. A. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(4):1034–1046Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Mansfield E., Jaffe A. B. Industrial research during the 1980s: Did the rate of return fall? Brookings Papers on Econom. Activity (1993) 2:289–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M., Hoskisson R., Ireland R., Duane R., Harrison J. Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(3):693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes J., Hutton P. A., Weber E. A functional-form-free test of the research and development/firm size relationship. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1991) 9(1):85–90Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R., Hitt M. Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(6):605–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R., Hitt M., Hill C. W. L. Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(2):325–341Link, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R., Johnson R. A. Corporate restructuring and strategic change: The effect of diversification strategy and R&D intensity. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(8):625–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes K. The interpretation and measurement of R&D intensity—A note. Res. Policy (1988) 17(5):301–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeffe A. B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):984–1001Google Scholar
• Jose M. L., Nichols L., Stevens J. Contributions of diversification, promotion, and R&D to the value of multiproduct firms: A tobin's q approach. Financial Management (1986) 15(4):33–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerin R. A., Varadarajan P., Rajan P., Peterson R. A. First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. J. Marketing (1992) 56(4):33–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim W., Lyn E. FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) theories and performance of foreign multinationals operating in the U.S. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1990) 21(1):41–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht A., Jeroen O. N., Reijnen. Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study. Res. Policy (1992) 21(4):347–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A., Motwani J. A methodology for assessing time-based competitive advantage of manufacturing firms. Internat. J. Oper. Production (1995) 15(2):36–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F. R&D investment and international productivity differences. (1992) . NBER Working paper no. 4164 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
• Lichtenberg F., Siegel D. The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 27(1):165–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F., Siegel D. The impact of R&D investment on productivity—New evidence using linked R&D-LDR data. Econom. Inquiry (1991) 29:203–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long W. F., Ravencraft D. J. LBOs, debt and R&D intensity. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:119–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason F. High volume learns to flex. Manufacturing Engrg. (1995) 114(4):53–59Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:511–528Google Scholar
• Morbey G. R&D: Its relationship to company performance. J. Product Innovation Management (1988) 5(3):191–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morbey G. R&D expenditures and profit growth. Res.-Tech. Management (1989) 32(3):20–23Google Scholar
• Morbey G., Reithner R. How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Res.-Tech. Management (1990) 33(3):11–14Google Scholar
• Morison E. E.Men. Machines and Modern Times (1966) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nagel R. N., Bhavgava P. Agility: The ultimate requirement for world-class manufacturing performance. National Productivity Rev. (1994) 13(3):331–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odagiri H. R&D expenditures royalty payments, and sales growth in Japanese manufacturing corporations. J. Indust. Econom. (1983) XXXII(1):61–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Hammel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(3):79–91Google Scholar
• Rechtin M. Europeans Roar into No. 2 in CSI. Automotive News(July 11):2, 59Google Scholar
• Roberts E. B. Benchmarking the strategic management of technology—I. Res.-Tech.Management (1995) January–February):44–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schendel D., Patton G. R. A simultaneous equation model of corporate strategy. Management Sci. (1978) 24(15):1611–1621Link, Google Scholar
• Sethi A. K., Sethi S. P. Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1990) 2(4):289–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souder W. E., Sherman J. D.Managing New Technology Development (1994) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Swamidass P. M. Technology people, and management. IEEE Spectrum (1993) 30(9):68–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Capturing value from technological innovation: Integrating strategic partnering and licensing decisions. Interfaces (1988) 18(3):46–61Link, Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-Devey D., Leiter J., Thompson S. Organizational survey nonresponse. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:439–457Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J. M., Abernathy W. J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega (1975) 3:539–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasilash G. S. Rockwell graphic systems cedar rapids: 36 out of 40 international machine tool makers say it can't be done. Production (1992) January):50–55Google Scholar
• Vernon R., Wells L. T.The Economic Environment of International Business (1991) 5th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K., Moore M. J. Product liability, research and development and innovation. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101(1):161–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolff M. Meet your competition: Data from the annual IRI R&D survey. Res.-Tech. Management (1994) January–February):18–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietz J., Fayissa B. The impact of exchange rates on investment in research and development. Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance (1994) 34(2):195–211Crossref, Google Scholar