Capacity Expansion and Replacement in Growing Markets with Uncertain Technological Breakthroughs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.12

References

  • Antonelli C. The role of technological expectations in a mixed model of international diffusion of process innovations: The case of open-end spinning rotors. Res. Policy (1989) 18:273–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balcer Y., Lippman S. A. Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 34:292–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cainarca G. C., Colombo M. G., Mariotti S. An evolutionary pattern of innovation diffusion: The case of flexible automation. Res. Policy (1989) 18:59–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chand S., Sethi S. Planning horizon procedures for machine replacement models with several possible replacement alternatives. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1982) 29:483–493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Halperin R. M. Optimal technology choice in a dynamic stochastic environment. J. Oper. Management (1986) 6:317–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The third age: A survey of computer industryThe Economist (1994) 1–22The Economist,(September 17–23)Google Scholar
  • Freidenfelds J.Capacity Expansion: Analysis of Simple Models with Applications (1981) (Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gaimon C. Dynamic game results of the acquisition of new technology. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(3):410–425LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein T., Ladany S. P., Mehrez A. A discounted machine replacement model with an expected future technological breakthrough. Naval Res. Logist. (1988) 35:209–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastings J. AmCoEx five year comparison of used computer prices. Comput. Currents (1994) 9:20–24Google Scholar
  • Hopp W. J., Bean J. C., Smith R. L. A new optimality criterion for nonhomogeneous Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. (1987) 35:875–883LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones P. C., Zydiak J. L., Hopp W. J. Parallel machine replacement. Naval Res. Logist. (1991) 38:351–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlson S. H. Adoption of competing inventions by United States steel producers. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1986) 34:415–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klincewicz J. G., Luss H. Optimal timing decisions for the introduction of new technologies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1985) 20:211–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebermann M. B. Market growth economies of scale, and plant size in the chemical processing industries. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 36:175–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luss H. Operations research and capacity expansion problems: A survey. Oper. Res. (1982) 30:907–947LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Methe D. T. The influence of technology and demand factors on firm size and industrial structure in the dram market. Res. Policy (1992) 21:13–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monahan G. E., Smunt T. L. Optimal acquisition of automated flexible manufacturing process. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(2):288–300LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muth J. F. Search theory and the manufacturing progress function. Management Sci. (1986) 32:948–962LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nair S. Modeling strategic investment decisions under sequential technological change. Management Sci. (1995) 41:282–297LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nair S., Hopp W. J. A model for equipment replacement due to technological obsolescence. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 63:207–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierskalla W., Voelker J. A survey of maintenance models: Control and surveillance of deteriorating systems. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1976) 23:353–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajagopalan S. Deterministic capacity expansion with deterioration. Management Sci. (1992) 38:525–539LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rajagopalan S., Singh M. R., Morton T. E. Capacity acquisition and replacement with uncertain technological breakthroughs. (1993) . Working paper, School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberg N.Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (1982) (Cambridge University Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M.Economic Analysis of Product Innovations: The Case of CT Scanners (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ubois J. Managers balance strategies to combat mac obsolescence. MacWEEK7(1993):14–15(02.22.93)Google Scholar
  • Veinott A. F. Extreme points of Leontief substitution systems. Linear Algebra and Its Appl. (1968) 1:181–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veinott A. F. Minimum concave cost solution of Leontief substitution models of multi-facility inventory systems. Oper. Res. (1969) 17:262–291LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.