Deterrence, Reputations, and Competitive Cognition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.62

References

  • Achen C. H., Snidal D. Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies. World Politics (1989) 41:143–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashton A. H., Ashton R. H. Aggregating subjective forecasts: Some empirical results. Management Sci. (1985) 31:1499–1508LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P. Strategic deterrence among multipoint competitors. Indust. Corporate Change (1993) 2:249–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister R. F., Hutton D. G., Tice D. M. Cognitive processes during deliberate self-presentation: How self-presenters alter and misinterpret the behavior of their interaction partners. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1989) 25:59–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bem D. J., Allen A. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psych. Rev. (1974) 81:506–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertilson H. S., Geen R. G., Donnerstein E. I. Methodology in the study of aggression. Aggression: Theoretical and Empirical Reviews (1983) 1(Academic Press, New York) 213–245Google Scholar
  • Camerer C., Weigelt K. Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium model. Econometrica (1988) 56:1–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlston D. E., Shovar N. Effect of performance attributions on others' perceptions of the attributor. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 44:515–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M. J., Miller D. Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:85–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darley J. M., Gross P. H. A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 44:20–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliashberg J., Robertson T. S. New product preannouncing behavior: A market signaling study. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25:282–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T. Social cognition and social perception. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1993) 44:155–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Steckel J. H., Winer R. S. Locally rational decision making: The distracting effect of information on managerial performance. Management Sci. (1992) 38:212–226LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Weiss A. M. Marketing in turbulent environments: Decision processes and the time–sensitivity of information. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:509–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1990) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Grossman R. Why IBM reversed itself on computer pricing. Bus. Week (1980) (Jan. 28):84Google Scholar
  • Hare A. P.Groups Teams and Social Interaction: Theories and Interaction (1992) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
  • Harrison G. W. Predatory pricing in a multiple market experiment: A note. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1988) 9:405–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56:32–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heil O. P., Robertson T. S. Toward a theory of competitive market signaling: A research agenda. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:403–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins E. T., Bargh J. A. Social cognition and social perception. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1987) 38:369–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R. M., Makridakis S. The value of decision making in a complex environment: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (1981) 27:93–107LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huth P. K.Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War (1988) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Issac R. M., Smith V. L. In search of predatory pricing. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:320–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jervis R. Deterrence and perception. Internat. Security (1983) 7:3–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Davis K., Berkowitz L. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perceptions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) 2(Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E., McGillis D., Harvey J. H., Ickes W. J., Kidd R. F. Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. New Directions in Attribution Research (1976) 1(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 389–420Google Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Nisbett R. E., Jones E., Kanouse D., Kelley H., Nisbett R., Valins S., Weiner B. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of behavior (1972) (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Karnani A., Wernerfelt B. Multiple point competition. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:87–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kmenta J.Elements of Econometrics (1986) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York)Google Scholar
  • Kreps D. M., Wilson R. Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27:253–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Montgomery D. B. Learning from strategic success and failure. J. Bus. Res (1987) 15:503–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Montgomery D. B. Simulation games as a research method for studying strategic decision making: The case of markstrat. (1992) . Research paper no. 1242. Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Larréché J., Gatignon H.Markstrat 2: Instructor's Manual (1990) (The Scientific Press, Redwood City, CA) Google Scholar
  • Lebow R. N., Stern P. C., Axelrod R., Jervis R., Radner R. Deterrence: A political and psychological critique. Perspectives on Deterrence (1989) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 25–51Google Scholar
  • Lebow R. N., Stein J. G. Beyond deterrence. J. Soc. Issues (1987) 43:5–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebow R. N., Stein J. G. Rational deterrence theory: I think, therefore I deter. World Politics (1989) 41:208–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGee J., Thomas H. Strategic groups: Theory, research, and taxonomy. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:141–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Predation, reputation and entry deterrence. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27:280–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mischel W.Personality and Assessment (1968) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Moore M. C., Sheppard B., Bazerman M., Lewicki R. Signaling and screening: Tactics in negotiations across organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations (1990) 2:77–93Google Scholar
  • Moore M. C. Signals and choices in a competitive interaction: The role of moves and messages. Management Sci. (1992) 38:483–500LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan P. M., Jervis R. L., Lebow R. N., Stein J. G. Saving face for the sake of deterrence. Psychology and Deterrence (1985) (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) 125–152Google Scholar
  • Neral J., Ochs J. The sequential equilibrium theory of reputation building: A further test. Econometrica (1992) 60:1151–1169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Orme J. Deterrence failures: A second look. Internat. Security (1987) 11:96–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ott L.An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis (1988) 3rd ed.(PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Peabody D. Selecting representative trait adjectives. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 52:59–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peabody D., Goldberg L. R. Some determinants of factor structures from personality trait descriptors. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57:552–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociology (1993) 98:829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Quattrone G. A. Behavioral consequences of attribution bias. Soc. Cognition (1982) 1:358–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reeder G. D., Brewer M. B. A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86:61–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross W. T. A re-examination of the results of Hogarth and Makridakis' “the value of decision making in a complex environment: An experimental approach.”. Management Sci. (1987) 33:288–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling T.Arms and Influence (1966) (Yale University Press, New Haven CT) Google Scholar
  • Scherer F. M.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1980) 2nd ed.(Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory.”. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:349–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinkula J. M. Market information processing and organizational learning. J. Marketing (1994) 58:35–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S. S., Kihlstrom J. F. When is a schema not a schema? The “big five” traits as cognitive structures. Soc. Cognition (1987) 5:26–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence A. M.Market Signaling (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Stasser G., Kerr N. L., Davis J. H., Paulus P. B. Influence processes in consensus models in decision-making groups. Psychology of Group Influence (1989) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 279–325Google Scholar
  • Swann W. B. Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psych. Rev. (1984) 91:457–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tetlock P. E., McGuire C. B., Mitchell G. Psychological perspectives on nuclear deterrence. Annual Rev. Psych. (1991) 42:239–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci. (1989) 35:942–962LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. P., Henderson C. M., Deighton J. Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1988) 42:194–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weede E. Extended deterrence by superpower alliance. J. Conflict Resolution (1983) 27:231–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weigelt K., Camerer C. Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:443–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92:548–573CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R., Stern P. C., Axelrod R., Jervis R., Radner R. Deterrence in oligopolistic competition. Perspectives on Deterrence (1989) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 157–190Google Scholar
  • Winter L., Uleman J. S. When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1984) 47:237–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wyer R. S., Srull T. K.Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context (1989) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Yamauchi H. Effects of actor's and observer's roles on causal attributions by Japanese subjects for success and failure in competitive situations. Psych. Rep. (1988) 63:619–626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.