SPOT: Scheduling Programs Optimally for Television

References

• Adolphson D. Documentation for the integer generalized network code AGNSS–IGN. (1989) . Brigham Young University Provo, UT, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
• National ad spending by media(September 27)1995:62Advertising AgeGoogle Scholar
• Aronson J. E. A SurvDynamic network flows. Ann. Oper. Res. (1989) 20:1–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auletta K.Three Blind Mice (1991) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Why the losing network is still a winner (1992) April 20):98–99Business WeekGoogle Scholar
• Danaher P. J., Mawhinney D. F. An application of choice modeling to optimal television program scheduling. (1995) . Working paper, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
• Dyer J. S. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):249–258Link, Google Scholar
• Evans J. R.Creative Thinking in the Decision and Management Sciences (1991) (South Western, Cincinnati) Google Scholar
• Expert ChoiceUser Manual, Version 8.0 (1992) (Decision Support Software, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
• Gantz W., Zohoori A. R. The impact of television schedule changes on audience viewing behaviors. Journalism Quart. (1982) 59(Summer):265–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gensch D., Shaman P. Models of competitive television ratings. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17(August):307–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhardt G. J., Ehrenberg A. S. C. Duplication of television viewing between and within channels. J. Marketing Res. (1969) 6:169–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhardt G. J., Ehrenberg A. S. C., Collins M. A.The Television Audience: Patterns of Viewing (1975) (Saxon House, Westmead, England) Google Scholar
• Head S. W., Eastman J. E., Head S. W., Klein L. A framework for programming strategies. Broadcast/Cable Programming: Strategies and Practices (1985) 2nd ed.(Wadsworth, Belmont, CA) 3–38Google Scholar
• Headen R. S., Klompmaker J. E., Rust R. T. The duplication of viewing law and television media scheduling evaluation. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16:333–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henry M. D., Rinne H. J. Predicting program shares in new time slots. J. Advertising Res. (1984) 24(2):9–17Google Scholar
• Horen J. H. Scheduling of network television programs. Management Sci. (1980) 26(4):354–370Link, Google Scholar
• Krugman D. M., Rust R. T. The impact of cable and VCR penetration on network viewing: Assessing the decade. J. Advertising Res. (1993) 33(January):67–73Google Scholar
• Lehmann D. R. Television show preference: Application of a choice model. J. Marketing Res. (1971) 8(1):47–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little J. D. C. Models and managers: The concept of a decision calculus. Management Sci. (1970) 16(8):B466–485Link, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D.Individual Choice Behavior (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Nemhauser G. L., Wolsey L. A.Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padberg M. W. The Boolean quadratic polytope: Some characteristics facets and relatives. Math. Programming (1989) 45:139–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read W. H.America's Mass Media Merchants (1976) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Reddy S. K., Aronson J. E., Stam A. Optimal prime-time television network scheduling. (1995) . Working paper WP-95-084. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
• Reddy S. K., Holak S. L., Bhat S. To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of line extensions. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(May):243–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust R. T.Advertising Media Models: A Practical Guide (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Rust R. T., Alpert M. An audience flow model of television viewing choice. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(2):113–124Link, Google Scholar
• Rust R. T., Echambadi N. V. Scheduling network television programs: A heuristic audience flow approach to maximizing audience share. J. Advertising (1989) 18(2):11–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Schrage L.LINDO. An Optimization Modeling System (1991) (Scientific Press, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Sinuany-Stern Z. A network optimization model for budget allocation in a multi-campus university. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1984) 35(8):749–757Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stam A., Kuula M. Selecting a flexible manufacturing system using multiple criteria analysis. Internat. J. Production Res. (1991) 29(4):803–820Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stipp H., Schiavone N. Research at a commercial television network: NBC 1990. Marketing Res. (1990) September):3–10Google Scholar
• Tiedge J. T., Ksobiech K. J. The “lead-in” strategy for prime-time TV: Does it increase the audience? J. Comm. (1986) 36(Summer):51–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson H. J., Marett P. G. A survey of management science implementation problems. Interfaces (1979) 9:124–128Link, Google Scholar
• Webster J. G. Program audience duplication: A study of television inheritance effects. J. Broadcasting & Electronic Media (1985) 29(2):121–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J. G., Lichty L. W.Ratings Analysis: Theory and Practice (1991) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wind Y., Saaty T. L. Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1980) 26(7):641–658Link, Google Scholar
• Zufryden F. S. Media scheduling: A stochastic dynamic model approach. Management Sci. (1973) 19(8):1395–1406Link, Google Scholar