Multinomial Logit Market Share Models: Equilibrium Characteristics and Strategic Implications

References

• Anderson Simon P., Palma Andre De, Jacques-Francois Thisse. Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell David E., Keeney Ralph L., Little John D. C. A market share theorem. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12(2):136–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko David, Perry Martin K., Spady Richard H. The logit model of monopolistic competition: Brand diversity. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 38(4):397–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg R., Golanty J. An early test market forecasting and diagnostic model for new product planning. J. Marketing (1978) 15(2, May):192–202Google Scholar
• Caplin Andrew, Nalebuff Barry. Aggregation and imperfect competition. Econometrica (1991) 59(1):25–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter Gregory S., Lehmann Donald R. A model of marketing mix, brand switching, and competition. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(August):318–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll J. D., Green P. E., DeSarbo W. S. Optimizing the allocation of fixed resources: A simple model and its experimental test. J. Marketing (1979) 43(1):51–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. Investigating the sensitivity of equilibrium profits to advertising dynamics and competitive effects. Management Sci. (1993) 39(9):1146–1162Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper Lee G., Nakanishi Masao. Market Share Analysis (1988) (Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cubbin John, Domberger Simon. Advertising and post-entry oligopoly behavior. J. Indust. Econom. (1988) 37(December):123–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman James W.Oligopoly and the Theory of Games (1977) (North-Holland, New York) Google Scholar
• Gensch Dennis H., Recker Wilfred R. The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(February):124–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruca Thomas S., Sudharshan D. Equilibrium characteristics of multinomial logit market share models. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 18(November):480–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruca Thomas S., Ravi Kumar K., Sudharshan D. An equilibrium analysis of defensive response to entry using a coupled response function model. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(4, Fall):348–358Link, Google Scholar
• Guadagni Peter M., Little John D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner panel data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(Summer):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta Sunil. Impact of sales promotion on when what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25:342–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Gaskin S. P. Application of the “Defender” consumer model. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(4, Fall):327–351Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Shugan Steven M. Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(4, Fall):319–360Link, Google Scholar
• Kamakura Wagner A., Russell Gary. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(November):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karnani Aneel. Strategic implications of market share attraction models. Management Sci. (1985) 31(5):536–547Link, Google Scholar
• Kotler P. Competitive strategies for new product marketing over the life cycle. Management Sci. (1965) 12(4 December):104–119Link, Google Scholar
• Kotler P.Marketing Management: Analysis Planning and Control (1980) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kumar K. Ravi, Sudharshan D. Defensive marketing strategies: An equilibrium analysis based on decoupled response function models. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):805–815Link, Google Scholar
• Lilien Gary L., Kotler Philip. Marketing Decision Making: A Model-Building Approach (1983) (Harper Row Publishers, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Lilien Gary L., Api Ruzdic A. Analyzing natural experiments in industrial markets. TIMS Stud. in Management Sci. (1982) 241–269Google Scholar
• Little John D. C. Aggregate advertising models: The state of the art. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):629–667Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V., Muller E. Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(Spring):86–106Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Karlquist et al A. Modelling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (1978) (North Holland, Amsterdam)75–96Google Scholar
• Monahan George E. The structure of equilibria in market share attraction models. Management Sci. (1987) 33(2):228–243Link, Google Scholar
• Naert Philippe A., Bultez Alain. Logically consistent market share models. J. Marketing Res. (1973) 10(3):334–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naert Philippe A., Weverbergh Marcel. On the prediction power of market share attraction models. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(2):146–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen Dung. Marketing Decisions under Uncertainty (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Punj Girish N., Staelin Richard. The choice process for graduate schools. J. Marketing Res. (1978) 15(November):588–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson W. T. Marketing mix reactions by incumbents to entry. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(4):368–385Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. ADPULS: An advertising model with wearout and pulsation. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(August):352–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Standard and Poor'sIndustry Surveys (1993,1994,1995) (Standard and Poor's Corp., New York) Google Scholar
• Steckel Joel. Using a “Robust” response function to allocate resources in a competitive environment. (1984) . Working paper Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Stern L. W., El-Ansary A. I.Marketing Channels (1982) 2nd ed.( Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Tull Donald S., Wood Van R., Duhan Dale, Gilpatrick Tom, Robertson Kim R., Helgeson James G. Leveraged decision making in advertising: The flat maximum principle. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23:25–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L. PERCEPTOR: A model for product positioning. Management Sci. (1974) 8(April):858–871Google Scholar