Cross-Disciplinary Evidence for Hyperbolic Social Discount Rates

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.11.1493

References

  • Ainslie G. Impulse control in pigeons. J. Experiment. Anal. Behavior (1974) 21:485–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie G. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and reward. Psych. Bull. (1975) 82:463–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie G. Matching is the integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sci. (1988) 11:679–680CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie G. Derivation of “rational” economic behavior from hyperbolic discount curves. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81:334–340(Papers and Proceedings)Google Scholar
  • Ainslie G., Hernstein R. Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. Animal Learning and Behavior (1981) 9:476–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benzion U., Rapoport A., Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1989) 35:270–284LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cropper M., Aydede S., Portney P. Rates of time preference for saving lives. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82:469–472(Papers and Proceedings)Google Scholar
  • Cropper M., Portney P. Discounting human lives. Resources for the Future (1992) summer):1–4Google Scholar
  • Fang K., Kotz S., Ng K.Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions (1990) (Chapman and Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein H.Multilevel Statistical Models (1995) 2nd ed.(Edward Arnold, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Goodin R. Discounting discounting. J. Public Policy (1982) 2:53–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Fisher E. Self-control in context. Behavioral and Brain Sci. (1988) 11:684–685CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Fisher E., Perlow S., Sherman L. Preference reversal and selfcontrol: Choice as a function of reward amount and delay. Behaviour Anal. Lett. (1981) 1:43–51Google Scholar
  • Harvey C. The reasonableness of non-constant discounting. J. Public Econom. (1994) 53:31–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson N., Bateman I. Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discounting and the implications for intergenerational discounting. Environ. Resource Econom. (1995) 5:413–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Her Majesty's TreasuryEconomic appraisal for central government departments: A technical guide (1991) (Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hernstein R. Relative and absolute frequency of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Experiment. Anal. Behavior (1961) 4:267–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horowitz J., Kaish S., Gilad B. Discounting money payoffs: An experimental analysis. Handbook of Behavioral Economics (1991) 2B( JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Horowitz J. Environmental policy under a non-market discount rate. Ecological Econom. (1996) 16:73–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel J., Green L., Green L., Kagel J. Intertemporal choice behavior: Evaluation of economic and psychological models. Advances in Behavioral Economics (1987) 1(Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey) Google Scholar
  • Kahnemann D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:363–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lande R., Engen S., Saether B. Optimal harvesting, economic discounting and extinction risk in fluctuating populations. Nature (1994) 372:88–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langford I., Bateman I., Langford H. A multilevel modeling approach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Environ. Resource Econom. (1996) 7:197–211Google Scholar
  • Lind R., Lind R. Introduction. Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy (1982) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Lind R. Reassessing the government's discount rate policy in light of new theory and data in a world economy with a high degree of capital mobility. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1990) 18:S8–S28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Thaler R. Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. J. Econom. Perspectives (1989) 3:181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Logue A. Research on self control–an integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sci. (1988) 11:665–709CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longford N.Random Coefficient Models (1993) (Clarendon Press, New York and Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Lyon R. Federal discount rate policy the shadow price of capital, and challenges for reform. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1990) 18:S29–S50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur J. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers. J. Experiment. Anal. Behavior (1986) 46:67–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur J., Commons M., Mazur J., Nevin J., Rachlin H. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior (1987) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey) Google Scholar
  • Norgaard R., Howarth R., Costanza R. Sustainability and discounting the future. Ecological Econom (1991) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Price C. Equity consistency, efficiency and new rules for discounting. Project Appraisal (1989) 4:58–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabl A. Discounting of long-term costs: What would future generations prefer us to do? Ecological Econom. (1996) 16:73–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rachlin H. Self-control. Behaviorism (1974) 2:94–107Google Scholar
  • Rachlin H.Introduction to Modern Behaviorism (1991) 3rd ed.(Freeman, NewYork) Google Scholar
  • Rachlin H., Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J. Experiment. Anal. Behavior (1972) 48:347–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reisner M.Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water (1986) (Viking, New York) Google Scholar
  • Strotz R. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1956) 23:165–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8:201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuckwell H.Elementary Applications of Probability Theory (1988) (Chapman and Hall, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • United States Office of Management and BudgetCircular no. A-92 (revised) (1992) (Washington, D.C)Google Scholar
  • Wahl R.Markets for Federal Water: Subsidies, Property Rights, and the Bureau of Reclamation (1989) (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Weitzman M. On the environmental discount rate. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1994) 26:200–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winston G., Woodbury R., Kaish S., Giland B. Myopic discounting: Empirical evidence. Handbook of Behavioral Economics (1991) (2B JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.