The Effects of R&D Team Co-location on Communication Patterns among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.11.S1

References

  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J. Organizational structure, information technology, and R&D productivity. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1986) 33:212–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C. J., Wasserman S. Log-multiplicative models for valued social relations. Sociological Methods & Res. (1995) 24:96–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker F., Steele F.Workplace by Design (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Blake R. B., Head C. C., Wedge B., Mouton J. S. Housing architecture and social interaction. Sociometry (1956) 19:133–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Burkhardt M. E. Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:869–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne D., Buehler J. A. A note on the influence of propinquity upon acquaintanceships. J. Abnormal and Soc. Psych. (1955) 51:147–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplow T., Stryker S., Wallace S. E.The Urban Ambience (1964) (Bedminster Press, Totowa, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Collins H. M. The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Sci. Stud. (1974) 4:165–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conrath D. W. Communications environment and its relationship to organizational structure. Management Sci. (1973) 20B:586–603LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson E. S.Engineering and the Mind's Eye (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Festinger L., Schacter S., Back K.Social Pressures in Informal Groups (1950) (Harper, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. Architecture and group membership. J. Soc. Issues (1951) 7:152–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finholt T., Sproull L., Kiesler S., Galagher J., Kraut R. E., Egido C. Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups. Intellectual Teamwork (1990) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 291–325Google Scholar
  • Fienberg S. E., Meyer M. M., Wasserman S. S. Statistical analysis of multiple sociometric relations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1985) 80:51–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fienberg S. E., Wasserman S. S., Leinhardt S. Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. Sociological Methodology (1981) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 156–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J., Wasserman S. Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:454–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13:191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gullahorn J. T. Distance and friendship as factors in the gross interaction matrix. Sociometry (1952) 15:123–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall K. R., Ritchie E. A study of communication behaviour in an R&D laboratory. R&D Management (1975) 5:243–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland P. W., Leinhardt S. An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1981) 76:33–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutt M. D., Reingen P. H., Ronchetto J. D. Tracing emergent processes in marketing strategy formation. J. Marketing (1988) 52(1):4–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacobucci D., Hopkins N. Detection of experimental effects in social network analysis. Soc. Networks (1994) 16:1–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:422–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108:577–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T. Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:715–726CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T., Holland W. E. Boundary spanning activity and research and development management. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1975) 22:130–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T., Holland W. E. Communications and innovations in research and development organizations. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:742–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc. Networks (1988) 10:359–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie D., Spinardi G. Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. Amer. J. Sociology (1995) 101:44–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maltz E., Kohli A. K. Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33:47–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazumdar S. How birds of a feather flock together in organizations: The phenomenon of socio-physical congregation and distancing. J. Architectural and Planning Res. (1995) 12:1–18Google Scholar
  • Moenaert R. K., Souder W. E. Context and antecedents of information utility at the R&D/marketing interface. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1592–1610LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morelli M. D., Eppinger S. D., Gulati R. K. Predicting technical communication in product development organizations. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1995) 42:215–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newcomb T. M.The Acquaintance Process (1961) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. Redundant overlapping organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(Spring):27–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinto M. B., Pinto J. K., Prescott J. E. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1281–1297LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rafii F. How important is physical collocation to product development success? Bus. Horizons (1995) 31(1):78–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal M. W. Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1974) 30:654–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith D. K., Alexander R. C.Fumbling the Future (1988) (Morrow, New York) Google Scholar
  • Souder W. E., Moenaert R. K. An information uncertainty model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:485–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stalk G., Hout T. M.Competing Against Time (1990) (Free Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stork D. A longitudinal study of communication networks: Emergence and evolution in a new research organization. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1991) 7:177–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss D., Ikeda M. Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85:204–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor R. L., Utterback J. M. A longitudinal study of communication in research. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1975) 22:80–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Katz R. External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. (1980) 26:1071–1085LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y. J., Wong G. Y. Stochastic blockmodels for directed graphs. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. (1987) 82:8–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Iacobucci D. Sequential social network data. Psychometrika (1988) 53:261–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Pattison P. Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika (1996) 61:401–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wells B. W. P. The psycho-social influence of building environment: Sociometric findings in large and small office spaces. Building Sci. (1965) 1:153–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahn G. L. Face-to-face communication in an office setting. Comm. Res. (1991) 18:737–754CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.