Interfunctional Conflict, Conflict Resolution Styles, and New Product Success: A Four-Culture Comparison

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.12.S192

References

  • Aharoni Y., Burton R. M. Is management science international: In search of universal rules. Management Sci. (1994) 40:1–3LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. A. Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type a behavior. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1989) 44:281–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. A. Positive effects of conflict. Employee Responsibilities and Rights J. (1991) 4:25–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J. Performance and consensus. Strategic Management J. (1980) 1:227–248IIICrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J. Strategic goals perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28:548–573CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown L. D.Managing Conflict at Organizational Interfaces (1983) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke R. J. Methods of resolving interpersonal conflict. Personnel Admin. (1969) July–August):48–55Google Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Crittenden V. L., Gardiner L. R., Stam A. Reducing conflict between marketing and manufacturing. Industrial Marketing Management (1993) 22(4):299–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas S. P., Craig C. S.International Marketing Research (1983) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Dyer B., Michael Song X. The impact of strategy on conflict: A cross-national comparative study of U.S. and Japanese firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1997) 28(3):467–493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Earley P. C., Singh H. International and intercultural research: What's next? Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:327–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M. Consensus diversity, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:403–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R. Designing the innovating organization. Organ. Dynam. (1982) Winter):3–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray J. L., Starke F. A.Organizational Behavior (1984) (Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH) Google Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing—A comparison between two new product teams. Management Sci. (1992) 38:360–373LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. R. The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(Winter):1–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13:191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes R. H., Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Dynamic Manufacturing (1988) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences (1980) (Sage, Beverly Hills CA) Google Scholar
  • Hofstede G. Management scientists are human. Management Sci. (1994) 40:4–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:256–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Leung K. Some determinants of conflict avoidance. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. (1988) 19:125–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung K., Lind E. A. Procedure and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1986) 50:1134–1140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakata C., Sivakumar K. National culture and new product development: An integrative review. J. Marketing (1996) 60:61–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norton J., Parry M. E., Michael Song X. Integrating R&D and marketing: A comparison of practices in Japan and the United States. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1994) 41(February):5–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson E. M., Walker O. C., Ruekert R. W. Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. J. Marketing (1995) 59:48–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G.Theory Z (1981) (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA) Google Scholar
  • Parry M. E., Song X. M. Determinants of R&D-marketing interface in high-tech Japanese firms. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(4):4–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled L. H. Demographic diversity conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7):615–631LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips E., Cheston R. Conflict resolution: What works? California Management Rev. (1979) 21:76–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pondy L. R. Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(2):296–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam L. L. Productive conflict: Negotiation as implicit coordination. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1994) 5:284–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam L. L., Poole M. S., Jablin F. M., et al. Conflict and negotiation. Handbook of Organizational Communication (1987) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 549–599Google Scholar
  • Rahim M. A. A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:368–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahim M. A.Managing Conflict in Organizations (1992) 2nd ed.(Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
  • Ruekert R. W., Walker O. C. Interactions between marketing and R&D departments in implementing different business strategies. Strategic Management J. (1987a) 8:233–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruekert R. W., Walker O. C. Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. J. Marketing (1987b) 51:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwenk C., Cosier R. A. Effects of consensus and devil's advocacy on strategic decision making. J. App. Soc. Psych. (1993) 23:126–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwenk C., Valacich J. S. Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on individuals versus groups. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1994) 59:210–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song X. M., Parry M. E. R&D-marketing integration in Japanese high-technology firms: Hypotheses and empirical evidence. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1993) 21(2):125–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song X. M., Parry M. E. What separates Japanese new product winners from losers. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13:422–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song X. M., Parry M. E. The determinants of Japanese new product success. J. Marketing Res. (1997a) 34:64–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song X. M., Parry M. E. A cross-national comparative study of new product development process: Japan and the United States. J. Marketing (1997b) 61(2):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song X. M., Thieme J., Xie J. The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: An exploratory study. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15(4):289–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song X. M., Xie J. The effect of R&D-manufacturing-marketing integration on new product performance in Japanese and U.S. firms: A contingency perspective. Science Institute Report No. (1996) 96–117Google Scholar
  • Souder W. E. Disharmony between R&D and marketing. Indust. Marketing Management (1981) 10:67–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thamhain H. J., Wilemon D. L. Diagnosing conflict determinants in project management. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1975) EM-22:35–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thamhain H. J., Wilemon D. L. Leadership, conflict, and program management effectiveness. Sloan Management Rev. (1977) 19:69–89Google Scholar
  • Thomas K. W., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 32nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 651–717Google Scholar
  • Thomas K. W., Kilmann R. H. Comparison of four instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psych. Rep. (1978) 42:1139–1145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ting-Toomey S., Gao G., Yang Z., Trubisky P., Kim H. S., Lin S., Nishida T. Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1991) 2:275–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D.The Conflict-Positive Organization (1991) (Addison-Wesley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Triandis H. C., Berman J. Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Sympos. on Motivation, 1989: Vol. 37: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (1990) (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE) 43–130Google Scholar
  • Tse D. K., Lee K., Vertinsky I., Wehrung D. A. Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives' choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing. J. Marketing (1988) 52:81–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tse D. K., Song X. M., Stringfellow A. Conflict management in new product development process: An international perspective. (1997) . Working paper, Marketing Department, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.