Staffing and Allocation of Workers in an Administrative Office

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.4.548

References

  • Bartholomew David J., Norman A., Wilson B. Renewal theory models for manpower systems. Manpower Research in a Defense Context (1969) (American Elsevier, New York) 120–128Google Scholar
  • Blau Peter. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (1955) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL) Google Scholar
  • Bolt Richard H., Koltun Walter L., Levine Oscar H. Doctoral feedback into higher education. Science (1965) 148(May):918–928CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buffa Elwood S., Cosgrove Michael J., Luce Bill J. An integrated work shift scheduling system. Decision Sci. (1976) 7:620–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buzacott J. A., Shanthikumar J. G.Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Buzen J. P. Computational algorithms for closed queueing networks with exponential servers. Comm. ACM (1973) 16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Co Henry C., Wysk Richard A. The robustness of CAN-Q in modeling automated manufacturing systems. Internat. J. Production Res. (1986) 24(6):1485–1503CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conrath David W., Hamilton William F. The economics of manpower pooling. Management Sci. (1971) 18:B19–B29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gaballa Adel, Pearce Wayne. Telephone sales manpower planning at Qantas. Interfaces (1979) 9(3):1–9LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon W. J., Newell G. F. Closed queueing systems with exponential servers. Oper. Res. (1967) 15LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanssmann Fred, Hess Sidney W., Crane C., Churchman West. A linear programming approach to production and employment scheduling. Management Technology (1960) ( The Institute of Management Sciences, Pleasantville, NY) 46–51LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holt Charles C., Modigliani Franco, Muth John F., Simon Herbert A.Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force (1960) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Homans George C.Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (1961) (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kimberly James C., Berger J., et al. A theory of status equilibration. Sociological Theories in Progress (1966) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston MA) Google Scholar
  • Larson Richard C. Perspectives on queues: Social justice and the psychology of queueing. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(6):895–905LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin Arie Y., Minton John W. Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):514–538LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall A. W., Olkin I.Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications (1979) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Megeath Joe D. Successful hospital personnel scheduling. Interfaces (1978) 8(2):55–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nystrom Paul C., Nystrom P., Starbuck W. Designing jobs and assigning employees. Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 2. Remodeling Organizations and Their Environments (1981) (Oxford University Press, New York) 272–301Google Scholar
  • Reiser M., Lavenberg S. S. Mean-value analysis of closed multichain queueing networks. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery (1980) 27(2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reisman Arnold, Buffa Elwood S. A general model for production and operations systems. Management Sci. (1964) 11:64–79LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schlefer Jonathan. Office automation and bureaucracy. Tech. Rev. (1983) 86:32–40Google Scholar
  • Shanthikumar J. G. Stochastic majorization of random variables with proportional equilibrium rates. Adv. Appl. Probab. (1987) 19:854–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shanthikumar J. G., Yao David D. On server allocation in multiple center manufacturing systems. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(2LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shih Wei, Sullivan James A. Dynamic course scheduling for college faculty via zero-one programming. Decision Sci. (1977) 8:711–721CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon Herbert A., Divine William R., Myles Cooper E., Chernin Milton. Determining work loads for professional staff in a public welfare agency. (1941) . Bureau of Public Administration, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Solberg James J. The optimal planning of computerized manufacturing systems: CAN-Q user's guide. (1980) . Purdue University, School of Industrial Engineering, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  • Solberg James J. Capacity planning with a stochastic workflow model. AIIE Trans. (1981) 13(2):116–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewman Shelby. Two markov models of open system occupational mobility: Underlying conceptualizations and empirical tests. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1975) 40:298–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suri R. Robustness of queueing network formulas. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery (1983) 30:564–594CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suri R. A concept of monotonicity and its characterization for closed queueing networks. Oper. Res. (1985) 33(3LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suri R., Hildebrant R. R. Modelling flexible manufacturing by mean value analysis. J. Manufacturing Systems (1984) 3(3Google Scholar
  • Trivedi Vandankumar M., Michael Warner D. A branch and bound algorithm for optimal allocation of float nurses. Management Sci. (1976) 22:972–981LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tuma Nancy B. Rewards, resources, and the rate of mobility: A nonstationary multivariate stochastic model. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1976) 41:338–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valliant Richard, Milkovich George. Comparison of semi-Markov and Markov models in a personnel forecasting application. Decision Sci. (1977) 8:465–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vandergraft James S. A fluid flow model of networks of queues. Management Sci. (1983) 29(10):1198–1208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Warner D. Michael. Scheduling nursing personnel according to nursing preference: A mathematical programming approach. Oper. Res. (1976) 24:842–856LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zelditch M., Anderson B., Berger J., et al. On the balance of a set of ranks. Sociological Theories in Progress (1966) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.