Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect FDI Survival?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.4.571

References

  • Audretsch D. New-firm survival and the technological regime. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1991) 73:441–450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caves R. E.Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (1982) (Cambridge University Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Caves R. E., Mehra S. K., Porter M. Entry of foreign multinationals into U.S. manufacturing industries. Competition in Global Industries (1986) (Harvard Business School, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hamel G., Doz Y. L., Prahalad C. K. Collaborate with your competitors—And win. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1989) January–February):133–139Google Scholar
  • Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hennart J.-F., Park Y.-R. Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Sci. (1993) 39(9):1054–1070LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Singh H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1988) 19:411–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J. Foreign entry and survival: Effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:333–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J., Guisinger S. Comparative business failures of foreign-controlled firms in the United States. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22(2):209–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markusen J. R. The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade. J. Econom. Perspectives (1995) 9(2):169–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masten S. E. Transaction costs mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Managerial and Decision Econom. (1993) 14:119–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGillivray R. G. Estimating the linear probability function. Econometrica (1970) 38:775–776CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morck R., Yeung B. Internalization: An event study test. J. Internat. Econom. (1992) 33:41–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver J. M., Mitchell W., Yeung B. The effect of own-firm and other-firm experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States, 1987–1992. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:811–824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of CommerceForeign Direct Investment in the United States, 1987 Transactions (1988) (U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Van De Ven W. P. M. M., Van Praag B. M. S. The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. J. Econometrics (1981) 17:229–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner J. The post-entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing industries. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42:141–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodcock C. P., Beamish P. W., Makino S. Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1994) 25:253–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zejan M. C. New ventures or acquisitions: The choice of Swedish multinational enterprises. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) XXXVIII:349–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.