Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.5.645

References

  • Aaker D. A.Strategic Market Management (1992) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bariff M. L., Lusk E. J. Cognitive and personality tests for the design of management information systems. Management Sci. (1977) 23(8, April):820–829LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bazerman M. H.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (1994) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Individual differences in the use of decision support aids, design of management information systems. J. Accounting Res. (1982) 20(1, Spring):1–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. An experimental evaluation of graphical and color- enhanced information presentation. Management Sci. (1985) 31(11, November):1348–1364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg R. C., Glazer R., Little J. D. C.The Marketing Information Revolution (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Blattberg R. C., Hoch S. J. Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model +50% manager. Management Sci. (1990) 36(8, August):887–899LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chakravarti D., Mitchell A., Staelin R. Judgment based marketing decision models: An experimental investigation of the decision calculus approach. Management Sci. (1979) 25(3):251–263LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cole C. A., Gaeth G. J. Cognitive and age-related differences in the ability to use nutritional information in a complex environment. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(May):175–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook V. J. Introduction to strategic studies in MARKSTRAT. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:467–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curren M. T., Folkes V. S., Steckel J. H. Explanations for successful marketing decisions: The decision maker's perspective. J. Marketing (1992) 56:18–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes R. M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psychologist (1979) 34(7 July):571–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Waele M. Managerial style and the design of decision aids. OMEGA (1978) 6(1):5–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodgson H. Management learning in MARKSTRAT: The ICL experience. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:481–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edland A., Svenson O., Svenson O., Maula A. J. Judgment and decision making under time pressure: Studies and finding. Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making (1993) (Plenum Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H. Strategic studies in MARKSTRAT. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:469–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Steckel J. H., Winer R. S. Group process and decision performance in a simulated marketing environment. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:545–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Steckel J. H., Winer R. S. The formation of key marketing variable expectations and their impact on firm performance: Some experimental evidence. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(1, Winter):18–34LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Steckel J. H., Winer R. S. Judgmental forecasts in a competitive environment: Rational vs. adaptive expectations. Internat. J. Forecasting (1990) 6:149–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Steckel J. H., Winer R. S. Locally rational decision making: The distracting effect of information on managerial performance. Management Sci. (1992) 38(2):212–226LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer R., Weiss A. M. Marketing in turbulent environments: Decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(November):509–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Nutt P. C. The influence of decision style on decision making behavior. Management Sci. (1980) 26(4, April):371–386LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Blattberg R. C., Glazer R., Little J. D. C. Experts and models in combination. The Marketing Information Revolution (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Schkade D. A. A psychological approach to decision support systems. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1, January):51–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R. M., Makridakis S. The value of decision making in a complex environment: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (1981a) 27(1, January):93–107LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R. M., Makridakis S. Forecasting and planning: An evaluation. Management Sci. (1981b) 27(2, February):115–138LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much ado about nothing? Management Sci. (1983) 29(5 May):567–579LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt R. G., Krzystofiak F. J., Meindl J. R., Yousry A. M. Cognitive style and decision making. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1989) 44:436–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huysmans J. H. B. M. The effectiveness of the cognitive-style constraint in implementing operations research proposals. Management Sci. (1970) 17(1, September):92–104LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang M. I. Decision making under time pressure: A model for information systems research. Inform. & Management (1994) 27:197–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kinnear T. C., Klammer S. K. Management perspectives on MARKSTRAT. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:491–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klayman J. Cue discovery in probabilistic environments: Uncertainty and experimentation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning Memory Cognition (1988) 14(2):317–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larréché J. C., Gatignon H.MARKSTRAT2 (1990) (The Scientific Press, Redwood City, CA) Google Scholar
  • Lilien G. L., Kotler P., Moorthy K. S.Marketing Models (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. Decision support systems for marketing managers. J. Marketing (1979) 43(Summer):9–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C., Nielsen N. R. The impact of the mode of information presentation on learning and performance. Management Sci. (1980) 26(10, October):982–993LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lusk E. J., Kersnick M. The effect of cognitive style and report format on task performance: The MIS design consequences. Management Sci. (1979) 25(8, August):787–798LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.The Nature of Managerial Work (1973) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mowen J. C., Gaeth G. J. The evaluation stage in marketing decision making. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1992) 20(2):177–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Keefe R. M. The implications of cognitive-style findings for operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1989) 40(5):415–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Remus W. Graduate students as surrogates for managers in experiments on business decision making. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 14:19–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D. Cognitive style and DSS design: A comment on Huber's paper. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5, May):580–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 1:7–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengupta K. Cognitive feedback in environments characterized by irrelevant information. OMEGA,. Internat. J. Management Sci. (1995) 23(2):125–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharda R., Barr S. H., McDonnell J. C. Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):139–159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Models of Man (1957) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1971) 6(6):694–744Google Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viswanathan M. Measurement of individual differences in preference for numerical information. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(5):741–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber E. U., Coskunoglu O. Descriptive and prescriptive models of decisionmaking: Implications for the development of decision aids. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1990) 20(2, March/April):310–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheelwright S. C., Makridakis S.Forecasting Methods for Management (1985) 4th ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wierenga B., Oude Ophuis P. A. M., Huizingh E. K. R., van Campen P. A. F. M. Hierarchical scaling of marketing decision support systems. Decision Support Systems (1994) 12:219–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witkin H. A., Oltman P. K., Raskin E., Karp S. A.A Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests (1971) (Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
  • Wright P. The harassed decision maker: Time pressure distractions and the use of evidence. J. Appl. Psych. (1974) 59(5):555–561CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.