On the Equivalence of General and Specific Control in Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.5.730

References

  • Berger P. D., Jaffe L. J. The impact of risk attitude on the optimal compensation plan in a multi-product situation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1991) 42:323–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cremer J. Arm's length relationships. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110:275–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dye R. Optimal monitoring policies in agencies. RAND J. Econom. (1986) 17:339–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55:303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7:24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jost P. On the role of commitment in a principal-agent relationship with an informed principal. J. Econom. Theory (1995) 68:510–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Srinivasan V. Compensation plans for single- and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmström-Milgrom model. Management Sci. (1993) 39:777–793LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan V. An investigation of the equal commission rate policy for a multiproduct salesforce. Management Sci. (1981) 27:731–756LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Townsend R. Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 21:265–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinberg C. B. An optimal commission plan for salesmen's control over price. Management Sci. (1975) 21:937–943LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.