Validation in Simulation: Various Positions in the Philosophy of Science

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1087

References

  • Barlas Y., Carpenter S. Philosophical roots of model validation: Two paradigms. Systems Dynam. Rev. (1990) 6:48–166Google Scholar
  • Bernstein R. J.Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science Hermeneutics, and Praxis (1983) (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
  • Blaug M., Latsis S. Kuhn versus lakatos or paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics. Method and Appraisal in Economics (1976) (Cambridge University Press, cambridge) 91–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boland L. A. a critique of Friedman's critics. J. Econom. Literature (1979) 17:503–522Google Scholar
  • Caldwell B. Clarifying popper. J. Econom. Literature (1991) 29:1–33Google Scholar
  • Carson J. S., MacNair E. A., Musselman K. J., Heidelberger P. Verification and validation: A consultant's perspective. Proc. 1989 Winter Simulation Conf. (1989) 552–557Google Scholar
  • Churchman C. W. Reliability of models in the social sciences. Interfaces (1973) 4(1):1–12LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., Grunberg E., Cyert R. M., March J. G. Assumption, prediction, and explanation in economics. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 298–311Google Scholar
  • Feyerabend P.Against Method (1988) (Verso, New York) . revised editionGoogle Scholar
  • Forrester J. W.Industrial Dynamics (1961) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Friedman M. The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics (1953) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 3–43Google Scholar
  • Gadamer H. G.Truth and Method (1975) 4th ed.(Seabury Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Giere R. N.Understanding Scientific Reasoning (1984) 2nd ed.(Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Goldberg J., Dietrich R., Chen J., Valenzuela T., Criss E. A simulation model for evaluating a set of emergency vehicle base locations: Development, validation, and usage. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (1990) 24:125–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herskovitz P. J. A theoretical framework for simulation validation: Popper's falsificationism. Internat. J. Model. and Simulation (1991) 11:56–58Google Scholar
  • Holmes O. W. Holmes and Frankfurter. The New York Times Book Review (1996) 15 Dec.(University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire) Google Scholar
  • Homer J. Why we iterate: Scientific modeling in theory and practice. System Dynam. Rev (1996) 12:55–80Google Scholar
  • Howson C.Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences: The Critical Background to Modern Science (1976) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 1800–1905CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howson C., Urbach P. Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. Open Court (1989) (La Salle, IL) Google Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) 2nd ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. (1977) . University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Lakatos I., Lakatos I., Musgrave A. Falsification and the methodology of scientific programmes. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (1970) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 91–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modelling (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Latsis S.Method and Appraisal in Economics (1976) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J. E., Kleindorfer G. B. The argumentum ad hominem and two theses about evolutionary epistemology: “Godelian” reflections. Metaphilosophy (1991) 22:63–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naylor T. H., Finger J. M. Verification of computer simulation models. Management Sci. (1967) 14:B92–B101LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oreskes N., Shrader-Frechette K., Belitz K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science (1994) 263:641–644CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper K.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1959) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Reichenbach H.The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (1951) (University of California Press, Berkeley,CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson G. P., Pugh III A. L.Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Rorty R.Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979) (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sargent R. G., Swain J. J., Goldsman D., Crain R. C., Wilson J. R. Validation and verification of simulation models. Proc. 1992 Winter Simulation Conf. (1992) Arlington, Virginia:104–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schruben L. W. Establishing the credibility of simulations. Simulation (1980) 34:101–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model. Tech. Forecasting and Soc. Change (1985) 28:93–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Personal communication. (1996) Google Scholar
  • Velikovsky I.Worlds in Collision (1950) (Victor Gollancz, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinberg R. J.An Examination of Logical Positivism (1960) (Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wible J. Friedman's positive economics and philosophy of science. Southern Econom. J. (1982) 49:350–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenberg J. On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science. Systems Dynam. Rev. (1990) 8:21–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.