Computer-Mediated Communication and Majority Influence: Assessing the Impact in an Individualistic and a Collectivistic Culture

References

• Asch S. E. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psych. Monographs (1956) 70(9):1–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker S. M., Petty R. E. Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67(1):5–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Lim L. H. The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Res. (1993) 24(4):430–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond M. H., Leung K., Wan K. C. How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. (1982) 13(2):186–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyacigiller N., Adler N. J. The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 16(2):262–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L., Jones B. Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(4):465–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clapper D. L.An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of a Group Decision Support System on Normative Influence in Small Groups (1991) (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA) Google Scholar
• Connolly T., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sci (1990) 36(6):689–703Link, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Sci32(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Gallupe R. B., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. A history of group support systems empirical research: Lessons learned and future directions. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York, NY) 59–77Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Nunamaker J. F., Vogel D. R. A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1991) 7(2):107–135Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Benbasat I. Small group research in information systems: Theory and method. The Information Systems Research Challenge: Experimental Research Methods (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 53–82Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Gallupe R. B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Sci. (1987) 33(5):589–609Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Diehl M., Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Towards the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(3):497–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diener E., Fraser S., Beaman A. L., Kelem R. T. Effects of deindividuating variables on stealing by halloween trick-or-treaters. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 33(2):178–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly A. H., Chaiken S.The Psychology of Attitudes (1993) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX) Google Scholar
• Earley P. C. East meets west meets mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(2):319–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C. Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):89–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallupe R. B., Dennis A. R., Cooper W. H., Valacich J. S., Bastianutti L. M., Nunamaker J. F. Electronic brainstorming and group size. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):350–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Rev. (1995) 37(3):110–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (1991) (McGraw-Hill, London) Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. The nature and design of post-industrial organizations. Management Sci (1984) 30(8):928–951Link, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management (1989) (The Free Press, New York, NY) Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Dickson G. W., DeSanctis G. Methodological issues in experimental IS research: Experiences and recommendations. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(2):141–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan M. F., Miller C. E. Group decision making and normative versus informational influence effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(2):306–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keppel G.Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1991) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R., Bouchikhi H. The dynamics of organizational development and change: How the past shapes the present and constrains the future. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):9–18Link, Google Scholar
• Kinney S. T., Dennis A. R. Reevaluating media richness: Cues, feedback, and task. Proc. Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. on System Sciences (1994) 4:21–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latane B., Wolf S. The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psych. Rev. (1981) 88(5):438–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leavitt H. J. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1951) 46(1):38–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):143–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Russo E. M., Hendrick C. Majority and minority influence. Group Processes (1987) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 13–54Google Scholar
• Mackie D. M. Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(1):41–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCauley C. The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(2):250–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Hollingshead A. B., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Putting the “group” back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York, NY) 78–96Google Scholar
• McGuire T. W., Kiesler S. B., Siegel J. Group and computermediated discussion effects in risk decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 52(5):917–930Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neck C. P., Moorhead G. Groupthink remodeled: The importance of leadership, time pressure, and methodical decisionmaking procedures. Human Relations (1995) 48(5):537–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth C. J. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93(1):23–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth C. J., Kwan J. L. Originality of word associations as a function of majority versus minority influence. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1985) 48(3):277–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth C. J., Kwan J. L. Minority influence, divergent thinking, and detection of correct solutions. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1987) 17(9):788–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R., George J. F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(7):40–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Jackson M. H., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Communication theory and group support systems. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York, NY) 281–293Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Seibold D. R., McPhee R. D. Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quart. J. Speech (1985) 71(1):74–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice R. E.The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology (1984) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Rice R. E. Task analyzability use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(4):475–500Link, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Berger J., Smith L. Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. Amer. J. Soc. (1985) 90(5):955–978Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronen S., Shenkar O. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):435–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S. H., Kim U., Triandis H. C., Kagitcibasi C., Choi S. C., Yoon G. Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. Individualism and Collectivism (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 85–119Google Scholar
• Shackleton V. J., Ali A. H. Work-related values of managers: A test of the hofstede model. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. (1990) 21(1):109–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith P. B., Dugan S., Trompenaars F. National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimension analysis across 43 nations. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. (1996) 27(2):231–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sondergaard M. Hofstede's consequences: A study of reviews citations and replications. Organ. Stud.15(3):447–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L. S., Kiesler S. B. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1492–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Stang D. J. Group size effects on conformity. J. Soc. Psych. (1976) 98(2):175–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D. W. The effect of culture on IT diffusion: E-mail and fax in Japan and the US. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(1):23–47Link, Google Scholar
• Tanford S., Penrod S. Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psych. Bull. (1984) 95(2):189–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevino L. K., Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Fulk J., Steinfield C. W. Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 71–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C.Individualism and Collectivism (1995) (Westview, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Valacich J. S., Dennis A. R., Nunamaker J. F. Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Res. (1992) 23(1):49–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valacich J. S., Mennecke B. E., Wachter R. M., Wheeler B. C. Extensions to media richness theory: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis. Proc. Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. on System Sciences (1994) 4:11–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):186–203Link, Google Scholar
• Watson R. T., Ho T. H., Raman K. S. Culture: A fourth dimension of group support systems. Comm. ACM (1994) 37(10):44–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J., Trevino L. K. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(6):1544–1572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisband S. P. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1992) 53(3):352–380Crossref, Google Scholar