A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.1.103

References

  • Arnold V., Bardhan I., Cooper W. W., Gallegos A., Aronson J., Zionts S. Primal and dual optimality in computer codes using two-stage solution procedures in DEA. Operations Research: Models, Methods and Applications (1997) (Kluwer, Norwell) . Forthcoming in (A volume in honor of G. L. Thompson)Google Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Charnes A., Cooper W. W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1078–1092LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Morey R. C. Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:513–521LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bazaraa M., Shetty C. M.Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (1979) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Golany B., Seiford L., Stutz J. Foundation of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econometrics (1985) 30:91–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. M.Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Li S. Using DEA to evaluate the efficiency of economic performance by Chinese cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sci. (1989) 23:325–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Short communication: Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1979) 3:339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rousseau J., Schrinnar A., Terleckyj N., Levy D. A goal-focusing approach to intergenerational transfers of income. Internat. J. Systems Sci. (1980) 7:443–446Google Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Wei Q. L., Huang Z. M. Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. Internat. J. Systems Sci. (1989) 20:1099–1118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Wei Q. L., Huang Z. M. Fundamental theorems of nondominated solutions associated with cones in normed linear spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1990) 150:54–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyson R. G., Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1988) 6:563–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell M. J. The measurement of productivity efficiency. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1957) Series A:120:253–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1988) 39:725–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B., Roll Y. A., Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. M. Incorporating standards via DEA. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joro T., Korhonen P., Wallenius J. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Sci. (1998) 40:962–970LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Wallenius J. A careful look at efficiency and utility in multiple criteria decision making: A tutorial. Asia-Pacific J. Oper. Res. (1989) 6:46–62Google Scholar
  • Norman M., Stoker B.Data Envelopment Analysis. The Assessment of Performance (1991) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E.Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (1986) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thanassoulis E., Dyson R. G. Estimating preferred target input-output levels using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res (1992) 56:80–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Langemeier L. M., Lee C.-T., Lee E., Thrall R. M. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. J. Econometrics (1990) 46:93–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Singleton F. R., Thrall R. M., Smith B. A. Comparative site evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces (1986) 16:35–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thrall R. M. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res (1996) 66:109–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warwick DEA User Manual (1992) . Warwick Business School. Coventry, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A., Fandel G., Gal T. The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. Multiple Objective Decision Making, Theory and Application (1980) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A. On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spektrum (1986) 8:73–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong Y.-H. B., Beasley J. E. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1990) 41:829–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. J. Oper. Res. Society (1996) 47:136–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.