Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods

References

• Bazaraa M. S., Sherali H. D., Shetty C. M.Nonlinear Programming (1993) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Contini B., Zionts S. Restricted bargaining for organizations with multiple objectives. Econometrica (1968) 36:397–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edgeworth F.Mathematical Psychics (1881) (London, UK)Google Scholar
• Ehtamo H. Incentive strategies and bargaining solutions for dynamic decision problems. (1988) . Research report A29, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, FinlandGoogle Scholar
• Ehtamo H., Verkama M., Hämäläinen R. P. On distributed computation of Pareto solutions for two decision makers. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1996) 26:1–6Google Scholar
• Kuula M. RAMONA—Version 0.1. An interactive multiple objective negotiation support system. (1990) . Computer program, Helsinki School of Economics, FinlandGoogle Scholar
• Kuula M. Solving intra-company conflicts using the RAMONA—Interactive negotiation support system. Group Decision and Negotiation (1998) 7:447–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luenberger D. G.Linear and Nonlinear Programming (1984) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Osborne D. K. Cartel problems. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1976) 66:835–844Google Scholar
• Phlips L.The Economics of Imperfect Information (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Pruitt D.Negotiation Behavior (1981) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Raiffa H.The Art and Science of Negotiation (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sebenius J. K. Negotiation analysis: A characterization and review. Management Sci. (1992) 38:18–38Link, Google Scholar
• Teich J. E. Decision support for negotiation. (1991) . Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
• Teich J. E., Wallenius H., Kuula M., Zionts S. A decision support approach for negotiation with an application to agricultural income policy negotiations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 81:76–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teich J. E., Wallenius H., Wallenius J. Advances in negotiation science. Yöneylem Araştirmasi Dergisi/Trans. Oper. Res. (1994) 6:55–94Google Scholar
• Varian H. R.Microeconomic Analysis (1992) 3rd ed.(W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Verkama M., Ehtamo H., Hämäläinen R. P. Distributed computation of Pareto solutions in N-player games. Math. Programming (1996) 74:29–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verkama M., Hämäläinen R. P., Ehtamo H. Multi-agent interaction processes: From oligopoly theory to decentralized artificial intelligence. Group Decision and Negotiation (1992) 2:137–159Crossref, Google Scholar