Centralization of Stocks: Retailers vs. Manufacturer

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.2.178

References

  • Anupindi R., Bassok Yehuda. Centralization of stocks: Manufacturer vs. retailers (unabridged). (1998) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Eppen G. Effects of centralization on expected costs in multi-location Newsboy problem. Management Sci. (1979) 25(5LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eppen G., Schrage Linus, Schwarz L. B. Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with leadtimes and random demands. In Multi-level Production/Inventory Control Systems: Theory and Practice (1981) (North-Holland, Amsterdam)163–169Google Scholar
  • Ernst R., Cohen Morris. Analysis of coordinated alternatives in a manufacturer/dealer inventory system under stochastic demand. Production Oper. Management J. (1992) 1(3Google Scholar
  • Felstead A.The Corporate Paradox: Power and Control in the Business Franchise (1993) (Routledge, London and New York) Google Scholar
  • Gerchak Y., Mossman David. Technical notes: On the effect of demand randomness on inventories and costs. Oper. Res. (1992) 40:804–807LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heyman D., Sobel M. J.Stochastic Models in Operations Research, Vol. II. Stochastic Optimization (1984) (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Iyer A., Bergen M. E. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):559–570LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A., Shugan S. M. Reply to: Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):103–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McWilliams G. Mom and Pop go high tech. Business Week (1994) November 21):82–90Google Scholar
  • Moorthy K. Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(4):375–379LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nahmias S.Production and Operations Analysis (1993) (IRWIN, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Return policies: Make money by making good. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) Fall):65–72Google Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Manufacturer's return policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):81–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M. Game theoretic analysis of substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. (1988) 35:397–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • PRNewswire The premiere of “GM BuyPower” puts customers in the driver's Seat. (1997) October 15Google Scholar
  • Schwarz L. A model for assessing the value of warehouse risk pooling over outside-supplier leadtimes. Management Sci. (1989) 35:7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stern G. Cadillac will test distribution method to cut delivery time and dealer stock. The Wall Street Journal (1994) August 16):A5Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.