Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: A Study of Automotive Braking Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.297

References

  • Automotive News Market Data Book (1982–1993) . Crain Communications Inc., Detroit, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Datar S. M., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T., Kaplan R. S. Costs of product and process complexity. Measures for Manufacturing Excellence (1990) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Breusch T. S., Pagan A. R. A simple test for heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica (1979) 47:1287–1294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto Takahiro. The power of product integrity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(6):107–118Google Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto Takahiro. Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cusumano M. A., Nobeoka K. Strategy, structure and performance in product development: Observations from the auto industry. Res. Policy (1992) 21:265–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Groote Xavier. Flexibility and marketing/manufacturing coordination. Internat. J. Production Econom. (1994) 36(2):153–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dell Computer Corporation (1994) . Annual report, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. L., Jain A., MacDuffie J. P., Bowman E., Kogut B. Strategies for product variety: Lessons from the auto industry. Designing the Firm (1996) (Oxford, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fonte W. A de-proliferation methodology for the automotive industry. (1994) . Masters thesis. Sloan School of Management and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Galsworth G. D.Smart, Simple, Design: Using Variety Effectiveness to Reduce Total Cost and Maximize Customer Selection (1994) (Oliver Wight, Essex Junction, VT) Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometrica Analysis (1990) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gupta S., Krishnan V. Product family based assembly sequence design to offset the responsiveness customization tradeoffs. (1996) . Working paper, University of Texas, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J. A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46:1251–1271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiao Cheng. Analysis of panel data. Econometric Society Monographs No (1988) (11. Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kennedy Peter. A Guide to Econometrics (1992) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Singh R., Tirupati D. A model-based approach for developing a family of technology-based products. (1997) . Working paper, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. To appear in Manufacturing & Service Oper. Management.Google Scholar
  • Lancaster K. The economics of product variety. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):189–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McNown R. F., Hunter K. R. A test of autocorrelation in models with lagged dependent variables. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1980) 62:313–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer Marc H., Lehnerd Alvin P.The Power of Product Platforms (1997) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Motor Business International (1987) . Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), London, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Nevins J. L., Whitney D. E.Concurrent Design of Products and Processes (1987) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pine B. J. II.Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ramdas Kamalini. Using parts sharing to manage product variety: A study in the automobile industry. (1995) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas Kamalini, Sawhney M. S. A cross-functional approach to evaluating line extensions for assembled products. (1998) . Working paper, Darden Graduate School of Business, Charlottesville, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson David, Ulrich Karl. Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(4):19–31Google Scholar
  • Rutenberg D. P. Design commonality to reduce multi-item inventory: Optimal depth of a product line. Management Sci. (1969) 15:491–509Google Scholar
  • Sanderson S., Uzumeri M. Managing product families: The case of the Sony walkman. Res. Policy (1995) 24:761–782CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiba S., Graham A., Walden D.A New American TQM: Four Practical Revolutions in Management (1993) (Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Suzue T., Kohdate A.Variety Reduction Program (1990) (Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24:419–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Ellison D. J. Customer requirements and the designselect decision. (1998) . Working paper, Department of Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Sartorius D., Pearson S., Jakiela M. Including the value of time in design-for-manufacturing decision making. Management Sci. (1993) 39(4):429–447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wards Automotive Year Book (1982–1992) . Ward's Communications, Southfield, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Whitney D. E. Manufacturing by design. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1988) 66(3):83–91Google Scholar
  • Yasukawa Shokichi. (1992) . Toyota motor corporation. Interview by Marshall Fisher and John Paul MacDuffieGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.