Evaluating Financial Risk in the Medicare Prospective Payment System
Published Online:1 Mar 1999https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.316
References
- . Regulation and the provision of quality to heterogeneous consumers: The case of prospective pricing of medical services. J. Regulatory Econom. (1991) 3:361–375Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Prospective payment for psychiatric services. J. Health Politics, Policy, Law (1992) 17(3):483–508Crossref, Google Scholar
- Rate setting by diagnosis related groups and hospital specialization. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(30):417–427Crossref, Google Scholar
- Refine-ment of the Medicare diagnosis-related groups to incorporate a measure of severity. Health Care Financing Rev. (1994) 16(2):45–64Google Scholar
- Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statist. Sci. (1986) 1(1):54–77Crossref, Google Scholar
- Insurance principles and the design of prospective payment systems. J. Health Econom. (1988) 7Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Gonzalez M. L. Managed care. Evolving contractual arrangements. Socioeconomic Characteristics of Medical Practice 1996 (1996) (Center for Health Policy Research, American Medical Association, Chicago) 15–25Google Scholar
- Diagnosis-related groups and general hospital psychiatry: The APA study. Amer. J. Psychiatry (1986) 143(2):131–139Crossref, Google Scholar
- Federal Register (1983) 48(171):39776Google Scholar
- The psychiatric DRGs: Are they different? Medical Care (1985) 23(10):1148–1155Crossref, Google Scholar
- An analysis of options for including psychiatric inpatient settings in a prospective payment system. (1988) . Final Report Contract No. NIMH-278-86-0002(BA), Health Economics Research Institute, Needham, MAGoogle Scholar
- . A simple objective method for determining a percent standard in mixed reimbursement systems. J. Health Econom. (1990) 9:253–271Crossref, Google Scholar
- Health Care Finance Administration (HCFA)Report to Congress: DRG Refinement:Outliers,Severity of Illness and Intensity of Care (1987) . (Baltimore MD: Office of Research and Demonstrations, Health Care Financing Administration, September 1987) HCFA Pub. No. 03254Google Scholar
- Bringing excluded psychiatric facilities under the Medicare prospective payment system. Medical Care (1987) 25(9, supplementGoogle Scholar
- Insurance aspects of DRG outlier payments. J. Health Econom. (1988) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Stemming the risk of capitated contracts: What providers should consider when buying stop loss insurance. Health Care Innovations: J. Amer. Assoc. Preferred Provider Org. (1995) 5(2):12–16Google Scholar
- The creation of economic efficiencies in hospital mergers. J. Health Econom. (1995) 14(5):507–530Crossref, Google Scholar
- Designing a state-level prospective payment system for inpatient psychiatric services in Medicaid. Admin. Policy Mental Health (1990) 18(1):43–54Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC)Medicare and the American Health Care System: Report to the Congress, June 1997 (1997) (Prospective Payment Commission, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
- Using hospital-specific costs to improve fairness of the perspective reimbursement system. J. Health Econom. (1990) 9:237–251Crossref, Google Scholar
- A theory of yardstick competition. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16:319–327Crossref, Google Scholar
- A risk-based prospective payment system that integrates patient, hospital and national costs. J. Health Econom. (1992) 11(1):7–42Crossref, Google Scholar
- Diagnosis-related groups for mental disorders, alcoholism, and drug abuse: Evaluation and alternatives. Hospital and Community Psychiatry (1984) 35(5):452–455Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Service (US DHHS)Report to Congress: Developing a Prospective Payment System for Excluded Hospitals (1988) (HCFA, Office of Research and Demonstrations, HCFA Pub. No. 03262) Google Scholar

