Risk Aversion or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments

References

• Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(1):73–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchard O. J. Movements in the equity premium. Brookings Papers on Econom. Activity (1993) 2:75–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell J. Y., Shiller R. J. Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook. J. Portfolio Management (1998) Winter:11–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs C. H., Meyer D. E. Risk preferences in coin-toss games. J. Math. Psych. (1969) 6:514–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C. Repeated optional gambles and risk aversion. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1524–1530Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwich AssociatesGreenwich Reports: Investment Management (1996) (Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
• Institute of Management & AdministrationIOMA Report on Defined Contribution Plan Investing (1995) August 15Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39:17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psych. (1972) 3:430–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values and frames. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39:341–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G. Additional tests of utility theory under unique and repeated conditions. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1991) 4:297–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G., Wagenaar W. A. Violation of utility theory in unique and repeated gambles. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory and Cognition (1987) 13(3):387–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball M. S. Standard risk aversion. Econometrica (1993) 61:589–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes L. L. Decision making in the short run. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (1981) 9:377–385Google Scholar
• Lopes L. L. Risk and distributional inequality. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (1984) 10(4):465–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes L. L. When time is of the essence: Averaging, aspiration, and the short run. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1996) 65(3):179–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra R., Prescott E. C. The equity premium: A puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. (1985) 15:145–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous time case. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1969) 61:247–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery H., Adelbratt T. Gambling decisions and information about expected value. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1982) 29:39–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Braunstein M. L. Preferences among gambles with equal underlying distributions. J. Experiment. Psych. (1971) 87(1):13–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poterba J. M., Summers L. H. Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and implications. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 22(1):27–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J. W., Zeckhauser R. J. Proper risk aversion. Econometrica (1987) 55:143–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M. Risk aversion, diminishing marginal utility, and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. (1997) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Redelmeier D. A., Tversky A. On the framing of multiple prospects. Psych. Sci. (1992) 3(3):191–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross S. A. Samuelson's fallacy of large numbers revisited. (1997) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT, MayGoogle Scholar
• Russo J. E. The value of unit price information. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:193–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia (1963) 98:108–113Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1969) 61:238–246Google Scholar
• Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1988) 1:7–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. J. Experiment. Psych. (1968) 78(3, Part 2):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Johnson E. J. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):643–660Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Bar-Hillel M. Risk: The long and the short. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learn., Memory, Cognition (1983) 9:713–717Crossref, Google Scholar