Efficient Design and Sensitivity Analysis of Control Charts Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.395

References

  • Albin S. A., Kang L., Shea G. An X and EWMA chart for individual observations. J. Quality Tech. (1997) 29(1):41–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barish N. N., Hauser N. Economic design for control decisions. J. Indust. Engrg. (1963) 14:125–134Google Scholar
  • Baxley R. V. An application of variable sampling interval control charts. J. Quality Tech. (1995) 27(4):275–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cao X. R. Springer Lecture Notes in Control and Optimization. Realization Probabilities: The Dynamics of Queueing Systems (1997) 194Springer-Verlag New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Crowder S. V. A simple method for studying run-length distributions of exponentially weighted moving average charts. Technometrics (1987) 29(4):401–407Google Scholar
  • Fu M. C. Optimization via simulation: A review. Ann. Oper. Res. (1994) 53:199–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. C., Hu J. Q. Extensions and generalizations of smoothed perturbation analysis in a generalized semi-Markov process framework. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control (1992) 37:1483–1500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. C., Hu J. Q.Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications (1997a) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. C., Hu J. Q. Application of perturbation analysis to the design and analysis of control charts. (1997b) . ISR Technical report TR 97-91, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Available in Postscript or PDF at www.isr.umd.edu/TechReports/ISR/1997Google Scholar
  • Fu M. C., Lele S., Vossen T. W. Economic design of control charts using Monte Carlo simulation. (1999) . Working paper, University of Maryland, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P.Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis (1991) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gong W. B., Ho Y. C. Smoothed perturbation analysis of discrete-event dynamic systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control (1987) 32:858–867CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimshaw S. D., Alt F. B. Control charts for quantile function values. J. Quality Tech. (1997) 29(1):1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho Y. C., Cao X. R.Discrete Event Dynamic Systems and Perturbation Analysis (1991) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho C., Case K. E. Economic design of control charts: A literature review for 1981–1991. J. Quality Tech. (1994) 26(1):39–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lele Shreevardhan. Steady state analysis of three process monitoring procedures in quality control. (1996) . Ph.D. dissertation, University Microfilms Inc., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Lele Shreevardhan. Economic design of control charts using steady state distributions. (1999) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery D. C.Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (1996) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rubinstein R. Y., Shapiro A.Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method (1993) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.