Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.425

References

  • Ahmed Erfanuddin. A data abstraction with inheritance in the process handbook. (1995) . Unpublished M.S. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Allen R., Garlan G. Formalizing architectural connection. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. on Software Engrg. (1994) MarchSorrento, Italy:71–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B., Masuch M. Devising expert systems in organization theory: The organizational consultant. Organization, Management, and Expert Systems (1990) (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin) 35–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein A., Dellarocas C., Malone T. W., Quimby J. Software tools for a process handbook. IEEE Bull. Data Engrg. (1995) 18(1, March):41–47Google Scholar
  • Bhandaru N., Croft W. B., Gibbs S., Verrijin-Stuart A. A. An architecture for supporting goal-based cooperative work. Multi-User Interfaces and Applications (1990) (Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam) 337–354Google Scholar
  • Brachman R. J., Levesque H. J.Readings in Knowledge Representation (1985) (Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA) Google Scholar
  • Carley K., Kjaer-Hansen J., Newell A., Prietula M., Masuch M., Warglien M. Plural-soar: Capabilities and coordination of multiple agents. Artificial Intelligence in Organization and Management Theory: Models of Distributed Intelligence (1992) (Elsevier Science, New York) 87–118Google Scholar
  • Carlson W. M. Business information analysis and integration technique (BIAIT)—The new horizon. Database (1979) Spring:3–9Google Scholar
  • Carter D. E., Baker B. S.Concurrent Engineering: The Product Development Environment for the 1990’s (1991) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chan Frank Y. The round trip problem: A solution for the process handbook. (1995) . Unpublished M.S. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran B. Towards a taxonomy of problem solving types. AI Magazine (1983) 4(1):9–17Google Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran B., Johnson T. R., Smith J. W. Task-structure analysis for knowledge modeling. Comm. ACM (1992) 35(9):124–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CIO Magazine Back support for benchmarkers. CIO (1992) June 1:16(Note: This article gives a brief description of the activities of the International Benchmarking Clearinghouse http://www.apqc.org/apqchome/apqchome.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Clancey W. J. The epistemology of a rule-based expert system—A framework for explanation. Artificial Intelligence (1983) 20(3):215–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K. Towards a coordination cookbook: Recipes for multi-agent action. (1991) . Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K. A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):157–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K., Osborn C. A coordination theory approach to process documentation and redesign. (1996) . Working paper, MIT Center for Coordination Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T.Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dellarocas C. A coordination perspective on software architecture: Towards a design handbook for integrating software components. (1996) . Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C. Towards a design handbook for integrating software components. Proc. 5 th Internat. Sympos. Assessment of Software Tools (SAST’97) (1997a) June 2–5Pittsburgh, PA:3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C. The SYNTHESIS environment for component-based software development. Proc. 8th Internat. Workshop on Software Technology and Engrg. Practice (STEP’97) (1997b) July 14–18London, UKCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C., Lee J., Malone T. W., Crowston K., Pentland B. Using a process handbook to design organizational processes. Proc. AAAI ’94 Stanford Spring Sympos. Comput. Organ. Design (1994) Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Elley Yassir. A flexible process editor for the process handbook. (1996) . Master’s thesis, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Friedland P. E. Knowledge-based experiment design in molecular genetics. (1979) . Technical report no. 79-771. Doctoral dissertation, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Friedland P. E., Iwasaki Y. The concept and implementation of skeletal plans. J. Automated Reasoning (1985) 1(2):161–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gasser L., Majchrzak A., Kidd P., Karwowski W. ACTION integrates manufacturing strategy, design, and planning. Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems IV (1994) (IOS Press, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Geisler Martha A. The evolving health care delivery systems: Applying the process handbook methodology to gain a vision of the future. (1995) . Unpublished M.S. thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer M., Champy J.Reengineering the Corporation (1993) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
  • Herman G., Klein M., Malone T. W., O’Donnell E. A template based methodology for process redesign. (1997) . Unpublished Working paper, MIT Center for Coordination Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Holt A. W. Diplans: A new language for the study and implementation of coordination. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems (1988) 6(2):109–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolodner J.Case-based Reasoning (1993) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateom, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotler Philip. Marketing Management (1997) 9th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Leavitt Wilder. Health care delivery systems: Using the MIT CCS handbook to create organizations for the 21st century. (1995) . Unpublished M.S. thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J., Lai K.-Y. What’s in design rationale? Human-Computer Interaction (1991) 6(3–4):251–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J., Malone T. W. Partially shared views: A scheme for communicating among groups that use different type hierarchies. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1990) 8(1):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J., Yost G. other members of the PIF Working Group. (1994) . The PIF process interchange format and framework. MIT CCS Working report #180, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J., Grunninger Micheal, Jin Yan, Malone Thomas, Tate Austin, Yost Gregg. other members of the PIF Working Group, The PIF process interchange format and framework version 1.1. Proc. Workshop on Ontological Engineering (1996) . ECAI ’96. Budapest, Hungary. Also available as MIT Center for Coordination Science, Working paper #194, 1996 and at http://ccs.mit.edu/pifGoogle Scholar
  • Lefkowitz L. S., Croft W. B. Interactive planning for knowledge-based task management. (1990) . Technical report. Collaborative Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Lenat D. B. CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(11):33–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt R. E., Cohen G., Kunz J. C., Nass C. I., Christiansen T., Jin Y., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. The virtual design team: Simulating how organizations structure and information processing tools affect team performance. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Lewis H. R., Papadimitriou C. H.Elements of the Theory of Computation (1981) (Prentice-Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lyon William K. The process handbook supply chain reengineering. (1995) . Unpublished M.S. thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen O. L., Moller-Pedersen B., Nygaard K.Object-Oriented Programming in the Beta Programming Language (1993) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K., Lee J., Pentland B. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Proc. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (1993) April 20–22Morgantown, WVCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marques D., Dallemagne G., Klinker G., McDermott J., Tung D. Easy programming: Empowering people to build their own applications. IEEE Expert (1992) 7(3):16–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masuch M., LaPotin P. Beyond garbage cans: An AI model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:38–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maull R., Childe S., Bennett J., Weaver A., Smart A. Different types of manufacturing processes and IDEF0 models describing standard business processes. (1995) . Working paper WP/GR/J95010-6, School of Computing, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UKGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey B.Organizational Systematics—Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification (1982) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Osborne C., Wyner G., Luconi F. Useful descriptions of organizational processes: Collecting data for the process handbook. (1994) . Unpublished Working paper, Center for Coordination Science, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Peters T.Liberation Management (1992) (Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
  • Peterson J. L. Petri nets. ACM Comput. Surveys (1977) 9(3):223–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R. An empirical taxonomy of work organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1968) 14:115–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth G. Uniting theory and practice: An illustrative case for bridging knowledge and action. (1997) . Unpublished Working paper, MIT Initiative on Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley J.Organizing Knowledge (1992) 2nd ed.(Ashgate, Brook-field, VT) Google Scholar
  • Ruelas Gossi Alejandro. Inventing organizations for the 21st century in Mexico: Supply chain management in a brewery. (1995) . Unpublished M.S. thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R., Leblebici H., DiTomaso N., Bacharach S. B. Variety and form in organizing transactions: A generative grammer of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (1988) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Sanchez Julio C. The long and thorny way to an organizational taxonomy. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(1):73–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schank R. C.Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schank R. C., Abelson R. P.Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge (1977) (Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Scheer A.-W.Business Process Reengineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises (1994) 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shaw M. et al. Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1995) April:314–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw M., Garlan D.Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline (1996) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Singh B., Rein G. L. Role interaction nets (RIN): A process description formalism. (1992) . Technical report no. CT-083-92. MCC, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Stefik M. Planning with constraints (MOLGEN: Part 1). Artificial Intelligence (1981) 16(2):111–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stefik M., Bobrow D. G. Object-oriented programming: Themes and variations. AI Magazine (1986) 6(4, Winter):40–62Google Scholar
  • Stovsky M. P., Weide B. W. Building interprocess communication models using STILE. Proc. 21st Ann. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1988) 2:639–647CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tenenberg J. Planning with abstraction. Proc. AAAI-86, Fifth Nationl Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (1986) Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thomsen K. S. Inheritance on processes, exemplified on distributed termination detection. Internat. J. Parallel Programming (1987) 16(1):17–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich D. O., McKelvey B. General organizational classification: An empirical test using the United States and Japanese electronics industries. Organ. Sci (1990) 1:99–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Eppinger S. D.Product Design and Development (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wegner P. Dimensions of object-based language design. Proc. Conf. on Object-Oriented Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA ’87) (1987) ACM, Orlando, FL:168–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winograd T., Flores F.Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design (1986) (Ablex, Norwood, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organizations: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wyner G., Lee J. Applying specialization to process models. Proc. Conf. Organizational Comput. Systems (1995) (Association for Computing Machinery, Milpitas, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yourdon E.Modern Structured Analysis (1989) (Yourdon, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Yu E. S. K. Modelling organizations for information systems requirements engineering. Proc. IEEE Internat. Sympos. Requirements Engrg. (1993) (IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 34–41Google Scholar
  • Zlotkin G. Coordinating resource based dependencies. (1995) . MIT Center for Coordination Science Unpublished Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.