Elicitation and Context Effects in Judgments: Fixed Sum Versus Fixed Scale Frames

References

• Barron F. H., Barrett B. E. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1515–1523Link, Google Scholar
• Bottomley P. A., Doyle J. R., Green R. H. Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating vs. point allocation. J. Marketing Res.Under review for publication inGoogle Scholar
• Doyle J. R., Green R. H., Bottomley P. A. Judging relative importance: Direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1997) 70(1):65–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardiner H.Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Jia J., Fischer G. W., Dyer J. S. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1998) 11:85–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kmietowicz Z. W., Pearman A. D. Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance. OMEGA (1984) 12(4):391–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lance C. E. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Appl. Psych. Measurement (1988) 12(2):163–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Construction of preference. Amer. Psych. (1995) 50(5):364–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava J., Connolly T., Beach L. R. Do ranks suffice? A comparison of alternative weighting approaches in value elicitation. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(1):112–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211:453–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M., Borcherding K. Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. Eur. J. Operat. Res. (1993) 67:1–12Crossref, Google Scholar