Decision Analysis by Augmented Probability Simulation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.995

References

  • Best N., Cowles M., Vines K.CODA: Convergence Diagnosis and Output Analysis Software for Gibbs Sampling Output, Version 0.30 (1995) (MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England) Google Scholar
  • Bielza C., Shenoy P. A comparison of graphical techniques for asymmetric decision problems. Management Sci. (1998) . To appear inGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M., Aitken C., Talbot M. A comparison of hybrid strategies for Gibbs sampling in mixed graphical models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. (1996) 21:343–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks S., Roberts G. Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Statist. Comput. (1999) . To appear inGoogle Scholar
  • Carlin B., Kadane J., Gelfand A. Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials. Biometrics (1998) 54:964–975CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes J., Shenoy P. A forward Monte Carlo method for solving influence diagrams using local computation. (1996) . Working paper, School of Business, University of KansasGoogle Scholar
  • Clyde M., Müller P., Parmigiani G. Exploring expected utility surfaces by Markov changes. (1995) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper G. A method for using belief networks as influence diagrams. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1989) 4(Association for Uncertainty in AI, Inc., Rome, N.Y.) 55–63Google Scholar
  • Cowles M., Carlin B. Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1996) 91:883–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand A., Smith A. Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85:398–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A., Roberts G., Gilks W., Bernardo J. M., Berger J. O., Dawid A. P., Smith A. F. M. Efficient Metropolis jumping rules. Bayesian Statistics 5 (1996) (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  • Henrion M., Lemmer J., Kanal L. Propagating uncertainty in Bayesian networks by probabilistic logic sampling. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1988) 2(North Holland)149–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hrycej T. Gibbs sampling in Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence (1990) 46:351–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenzarli A. Solving influence diagrams using Gibbs sampling. (1995) . Working paper, College of Business, University of Tampa, FLGoogle Scholar
  • Lauritzen S., Spiegelhalter D. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1988) 50:157–224Google Scholar
  • Matzkevich I., Abramson B. Decision analytic networks in artificial intelligence. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller A. C., Rice T. R. Discrete approximations of probability distributions. Management Sci. (1983) 29:352–363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Müller P., Parmigiani G. Optimal design via curve fitting of Monte Carlo experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1996) 90:1322–1330Google Scholar
  • Palmer J. L., Müller P. Bayesian optimal design in population models of hematologic data. Statist. in Medicine (1998) 17:1613–1622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J. Fusion, propagation and structuring in belief networks. Artificial Intelligence (1986) 29:241–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J. Evidential reasoning using stochastic simulation of causal models. Artificial Intelligence (1987) 32:245–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J.Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems (1988) (Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Poland W. B.Decision Analysis with continuous and discrete variables: A mixture distribution approach (1994) . Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Polson N. G., Bernardo J. M., Berger J. O., Dawid A. P., Smith A. F. M. Convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Bayesian Statistics 5 (1996) (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  • Pradhan M., Dagum P., Horvitz E., Jensen F. Optimal Monte Carlo estimation of belief network inference. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1996) 12(Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco) 446–453Google Scholar
  • Rìos Insua D., Salewicz K., Müller P., Bielza C., French S., Smith J. Q. Bayesian methods in reservoir operations: The Zambezi river case. The Practice of Bayesian Analysis (1997) (Arnold, London, UK) 107–130Google Scholar
  • Robert C. P. Convergence control methods for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Statist. Sci. (1995) 10:473–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts G., Smith A. Simple conditions for the convergence of the Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. (1994) 49:207–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shachter R. Evaluating influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:871–882LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shachter R. Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams. Oper. Res. (1988) 36:589–604LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shachter R., Kenley R. Gaussian influence diagrams. Management Sci. (1989) 35:527–550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shachter R., Peot M., Henrion M., Shachter R., Kanal L., Lemmer J. Simulation approaches to general probabilistic inference on belief networks. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1990) 5(Elsevier, New York) 221–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shachter R., Peot M. Decision making using probabilistic inference methods. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1992) 8(Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco, CA) 276–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shenoy P. A comparison of graphical techniques for decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 78:1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A. Bayesian computational methods. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Series A (1991) 337:369–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. E. Moment methods for decision analysis. Management Sci. (1993) 39:340–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A., Roberts G. Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B (1993) 55:3–24Google Scholar
  • Tanner M.Tools for Statistical Inference (1994) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tierney L. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion). Ann. Statist. (1994) 22:1701–1762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • York J. Use of the Gibbs sampler in expert systems. Artificial Intelligence (1992) 56:115–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.