Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect

References

• Ariely D., Wallsten S. T. Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(3):223–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bostic R., Herrnstein R., Luce R. D. The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1990) 13:192–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmon Z., Ariely D. Attending to what one gives up: A task-goal view of why value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. (1998) . Working paper, Fuqua School, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Carmon Z., Simonson I. Price-quality tradeoffs in choice versus matching: New insights into the prominence effect. J. Consumer Psych. (1998) 7:323–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman G. B., Johnson E. J. Preference reversals in monetary and life expectancy evaluations. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 62:300–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coupey E., Irwin J., Payne J. Product category familiarity and preference construction. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 24:459–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delquie P. Inconsistent tradeoffs between attributes: New evidence in preference assessment biases. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1382–1395Link, Google Scholar
• Dhar R., Wertenbroch K. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. (1998) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Diamond P. A., Hausman J. A., Hausman J. A. On contingent valuation measurement of nonuse values. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (1993) (North Holland Press, Amsterdam, Holland) 3–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W. Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multi-attribute value models. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 62:252–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Hawkins S. A. Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception & Performance (1993) 19:580–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? Amer. Psych. (1991) 46:835–847Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabrielli W. F., von Winterfeldt D. Are attribute weights sensitive to the range of attribute values in multiattribute utility measurement? (1978) . Working paper, Social Science Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins S. A. Information processing strategies in riskless preference reversals. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1994) 59:1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L.Value-focused Thinking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Montgomery H., Humphreys P. C., Svenson O., Vari A. Decision rules and the search for dominance structure. Analyzing and Aiding Decision Processes (1983) (North Holland Press, Amsterdam, Holland) 343–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing approach. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:87–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schkade D. A., Johnson E. J. Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1989) 44:203–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir E., Simonson I., Tversky A. Reason-based choice. Cognition (1993) 49:11–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard R. N., Shelley M. W., Bryan G. L. On subjectively optimum selection among multi-attribute alternatives. Human Judgments and Optimality (1964) (Wiley, New York) 257–281Google Scholar
• Simonson I. Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16:158–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I., Carmon Z., O'Curry S. Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales promotions on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:23–40Link, Google Scholar
• Slovic P. The construction of preference. Amer. Psych. (1995) 50:364–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P., Griffin D., Tversky A., Hogarth R. Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (1990) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 5–27Google Scholar
• Tukey J. W.Exploratory Data Analysis (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84:327–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95:371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Slovic P., Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversal. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:204–217Google Scholar
• von Nitzsch R., Weber M. The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Sci. (1993) 39:937–943Link, Google Scholar