Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance

References

• Abernathy F. H., Dunlop J. T., Hammond J., Weil D. The information-integrated channel: A study of the U.S. apparel industry in transition. Brookings Papers on Microeconomic Activity (1995) 175–247Google Scholar
• Anand K., Mendelson H. Information and organization for horizontal multimarket coordination. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1609–1627Link, Google Scholar
• Bassok Y., Anupindi R. Analysis of supply contracts with commitments and flexibility. (1998) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Bell C. E., Stidman S. Individual versus social optimization in the allocation of customers to alternative servers. Management Sci. (1983) 29:831–839Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G., Lariviere M. An equilibrium analysis of linear and proportional allocation of scarce capacity. IIE Trans. (1998) . Forthcoming inGoogle Scholar
• Dewan S., Mendelson H. User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1502–1517Link, Google Scholar
• Donohue K. L. Supply contracts for fashion goods: Optimizing channel profits. (1996) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Eppen G. D., Iyer A. V. Backup agreements in fashion buying—The value of upstream flexibility. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1469–1484Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Hammond J. H., Obermeyer W. R., Raman A. Making supply meet demand in an uncertain world. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 72(3):83–89Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:87–99Link, Google Scholar
• Frank R. Frito-Lay puts up more than chips in deal for Olestra. Wall Street Journal (1996) May 31):A–3Google Scholar
• Gale I. L., Holmes T. J. Advance-purchase discount and monopoly allocation of capacity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83:135–146Google Scholar
• Gary M. A $30 billion windfall? Progressive Grocer (1993) 72:7Google Scholar
• Gibbard A. Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica (1973) 41:587–601Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruley B., Pereira J. FTC says Toys R Us competes unfairly. Wall Street Journal (1996) May 23):A–3Google Scholar
• Ha A. Y. Inventory rationing in a make-to-stock production system with several demand classes and lost sales. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1093–1103Link, Google Scholar
• Harris R., Raviv A. A theory of monopoly pricing schemes with demand uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71:347–365Google Scholar
• Henderson A. B. U.S. jury convicts ex-Honda officials of taking bribes. Wall Street Journal (1995) June 2):B–5Google Scholar
• Hwang S. L., Valeriano L. Marketers and consumers get the jitters over severe shortages of nicotine patches. Wall Street Journal (1992) May 22):B–1Google Scholar
• Kaplan A. Stock rationing. Management Sci. (1969) 15:260–267Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J. J.Fundamentals of Public Economics (1988) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lederer P. J., Li L. Pricing, production, scheduling, and delivery-time competition. Oper. Res. (1994) 45:407–420Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43:546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J., Hahn Frank. Optimal multi-unit auctions. The Economics of Missing Markets, Information, and Games (1989) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1queue. Oper. Res. (1990) 38:870–883Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 58:1255–1278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moulin H., Binmore K., Kirman A., Tani P. On the fair and coalitions-strategy proof allocation of private goods. Frontiers of Game Theory (1993) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nahmias S., Demmy W. S. Operating characteristics of an inventory systems with rationing. Management Sci. (1981) 27:1236–1244Link, Google Scholar
• Oren S., Smith S., Wilson R. Competitive nonlinear tariffs. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 29:49–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peck J. Demand uncertainty, incomplete markets, and the optimality of rationing. J. Econom. Theory (1996) 70:342–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porteus E., Whang S. On manufacturing/marketing incentives. Management Sci. (1991) 37:1166–1181Link, Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite M. Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J. Econom. Theory (1975) 10:187–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spengler J. Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. (1950) 347–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprumont Y. The division problem with single-peaked preferences: A characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica (1991) 59:509–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topkis D. Optimal ordering and rationing policies in a nonstationary dynamic inventory model with ndemand classes. Management Sci. (1968) 15:160–176Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay A., Lovejoy W. Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (1998) . Forthcoming inGoogle Scholar