Note: Rule-Based Forecasting vs. Damped-Trend Exponential Smoothing

References

• Armstrong J. S., Collopy F. Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons. Internat. J. Forecasting (1992) 8:69–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collopy F., Armstrong J. S. Rule-based forecasting: Development and validation of an expert systems approach to combining time series extrapolations. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1394–1414Link, Google Scholar
• Fildes R. The evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods. Internat. J. Forecasting (1992) 8:81–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fildes R., Makridakis S. Forecasting and loss functions. Internat. J. Forecasting (1988) 4:545–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner E. S. Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. J. Forecasting (1985) 4:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner E. S., McKenzie E. Forecasting trends in time series. Management Sci. (1985) 31:1237–1246Link, Google Scholar
• Makridakis S., et al. The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition. J. Forecasting (1982) 1:111–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makridakis S., Hibon M. Exponential smoothing: The effect of initial values and loss functions on post-sample forecasting accuracy. Internat. J. Forecasting (1991) 7:317–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delphus, Inc.Peer Planner (1997) (Morristown, NJ)Google Scholar
• Vokurka R. J., et al. Automatic feature identification and graphical support in rule-based forecasting: A comparison. Internat. J. Forecasting (1996) 12:495–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss A., Andersen A. Estimating time series models using the relevant forecast evaluation criterion. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (1984) 147(Part 3):484–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A. A tale of forecasting 1001 series: The Bayesian Knight strikes again. Internat. J. Forecasting (1986) 2:491–494Crossref, Google Scholar