Attribute Conflict and Preference Uncertainty: Effects on Judgment Time and Error

References

• Bell D. E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1982) 30:961–981Link, Google Scholar
• Berlyne D. E. Conflict and reaction time: reply to Kiesler. Psych. Reports (1966) 19:413–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J., Luce M. F., Payne J. W. Correlation, conflict, and choice. J. of Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (1993) 19:931–951Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs C. H., Avrunin G. S. Single-peaked functions and the theory of preference. Psych. Rev. (1976) 84:216–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W. Multi-dimensional utility models for risky and riskless choice. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1976) 17:127–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Carmon Z., Ariely D., Zauberman G. Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1057–1075Link, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Hawkins S. A. Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. J. of Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (1993) 19:580–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Jia J., Luce M. F. Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: The RandMAU model. Management Sci. (2000) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein W. M., Einhorn H. J. Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Psych. Rev. (1987) 94:236–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen F.Consumer Choice Behavior: A Cognitive Theory (1972) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M.Judgement and Choice (1987) 2nd Edition(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Janis I. L., Mann L.Decision Making (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Johnson E. J., Payne J. W., Bettman J. R. Information displays and preference reversals. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Process (1988) 42:1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kiesler C. A. Conflict and number of choice alternatives. Psych. Reports (1966) 18:603–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laskey K. B., Fischer G. W. Estimating utility functions in the presence of response error. Management Sci. (1987) 33:965–980Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin K.Field Theory in Social Science (1951) (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L. D., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G., Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. (1982) 92:805–824Google Scholar
• Luce M. F. Choosing to avoid: coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 24:409–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9:587–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard R. N., Shelly Maynard W., Bryan Glenn L. On subjectively optimum selection among multiattribute alternatives. Human Judgment and Optimality (1964) (Wiley, New York) 257–281Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95:371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Shafir E. Choice under conflict: the dynamics of deferred decisions. Psych. Sci. (1992) 6:358–361Crossref, Google Scholar