A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies

References

  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. (1997) 28:557–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3:439–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R., Beach L. R. Image theory, the unifying perspective. Decision Making in the Workplace: A Unified Perspective (1996) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 1–20Google Scholar
  • Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R., Beach L. R. The basics of image theory. Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 3–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black J. B., Kay D. S., Soloway E. M., Carroll J. M. Goal and plan knowledge representations: From stories to text editors and programs. Interfacing Thought (1987) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 36–60Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Caldwell D. F., O'Reilly C. A. Measuring person-job fit within a profile-comparison process. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75:648–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13:319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35:982–1002LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Social Psych. (1992) 22:1111–1132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Kottemann J. E. Determinants of decision rule use in production planning task. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 63:145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (1996) 45:19–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M., Gerard H. B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal and Social Psych. (1955) 51:629–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll J., Ajzen I. Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1992) 63:754–765CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fazio R. H., Zanna M., Berkowitz L. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1981) 14(Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 161–202Google Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • French J. R. P., Raven B., Cartwright D. The bases of social power. Studies in Social Power (1959) (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI) 150–167Google Scholar
  • Fulk J., Steinfield C. W., Schmitz J., Power J. G. A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Comm. Res. (1987) 14:529–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding the linkage between user evaluations of systems and the underlying systems. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1976) 16:250–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. (1994) 40:440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelman H. C. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution (1958) 2:51–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kieras D. E., Polson P. G. An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Internat. J. of Man-Machine Stud. (1985) 22:365–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiesler C. A., Kiesler S. B.Conformity (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Rice R. E., Cool C., Fish R. S. Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:437–453LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D., Deschamps I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1252–1265LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Latham G. P.A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Loher B. T., Noe R. A., Moeller N. L., Fitzgerald M. P. A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70:280–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2:173–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2:192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Norman D. A., Carroll J. M. Cognitive engineering—Cognitive science. Interfacing Thought (1987) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 325–336Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Power in Organizations (1981) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Organizations and Organization Theory (1982) (Pitman, Marsh-field, MA) Google Scholar
  • Polson P. G., Carroll J. M. A quantitative theory of human-computer interaction. Interfacing Thought (1987) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 184–235Google Scholar
  • Ram S., Jung H. “Forced” adoption of innovation in organizations: Consequences and implications. J. Product Innovation Management (1991) 8:117–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Aydin C. Attitudes towards using new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:219–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberson L. Assessing personal work goals in the organizational setting: Development and evaluation of the work concerns inventory. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1989) 44:345–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. Social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23:224–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sichel D. E.The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective (1997) (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1328–1342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6:144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tybout A. M., Scott C. A. Availability of well-defined internal knowledge and the attitude formation process: Information aggregation versus self-perception. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1983) 44:474–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vallacher R. R., Kaufman J., Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. Dynamics of action identification: Volatility and structure in the mental representation of behavior. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior (1996) (The Guilford Press, New York) 260–282Google Scholar
  • Vallacher R. R., Wegner D. M. What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psych. Rev. (1987) 94:3–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quart. (1999) 23:239–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. (1996) 27:451–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. (2000) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Speier C. Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1999) 79:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vessey I. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sci. (1991) 22:219–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Warshaw P. R. A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to Fishbein. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17:153–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Trevino L. K. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:1544–1572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.