Improving Manufacturing Performance Through Process Change and Knowledge Creation

References

• Adler P. S., Clark K. B. Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Sci. (1991) 37:267–281Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Bailey C. D. Forgetting and the learning curve: A laboratory study. Management Sci. (1989) 35:340–352Link, Google Scholar
• Bohn R. E. Measuring and managing technological knowledge. Sloan Management Rev. (1994) 36:61–73Google Scholar
• Chand S., Moskowitz H., Novak A., Rekhi I., Sorger G. Capacity allocation for dynamic process change with quality and demand considerations. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:964–975Link, Google Scholar
• Chew W. B., Leonard-Barton D., Bohn R. E. Beating Murphy's Law. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) Spring:5–17Google Scholar
• Darr E. D., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1750–1762Link, Google Scholar
• Dorroh J. R., Gulledge T. R., Womer N. K. Investment in knowledge: A generalization of learning by experience. Management Sci. (1994) 40:947–958Link, Google Scholar
• Fine C. H. Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1301–1305Link, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C. Planning information technology-worker systems. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1308–1328Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith C. S. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high-technology firms. California Management Rev. (1990) Summer:56–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garvin D. Building a learning organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) July-August):78–91Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Griffith T. L. A process approach to the implementation of new technology. J. Engrg. and Tech. Management (1991) 8:261–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartl R. F., Sethi S. P. Optimal control of a class of systems with continuous lags: Dynamic programming approach and economic interpretations. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1984) 43:73–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R. H., Clark K. B., Clark K. B., Hayes R. H., Lorenz C. Exploring the sources of productivity differences at the factory level. The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma (1985) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) 151–188Google Scholar
• Hax A. C., Candea D.Production and Inventory Management (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Baum J. C. Chain affiliation and the failure of Manhattan hotels, 1898–1980. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:68–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempf K.Conversations and discussions (1994–1995) (INTEL Corporation, Chandler, AZ) Google Scholar
• Li G., Rajagopalan S. Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1517–1532Link, Google Scholar
• Lindberg P. Management of uncertainty in AMT implementation: The case of FMS. Internat. J. Oper. and Production Management (1992) 12:57–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels W. Optimal dynamic advertising policies in the presence of continuously distributed time lags. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1977) 22:79–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P., Wheelwright S. C. The new logic of high-tech R&D. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73:93–105Google Scholar
• Roth A. V., Marucheck A. S.The knowledge factory: A paradigm for accelerated learning (1994) (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Sethi S. P. Sufficient conditions for the optimal control of a class of systems with continuous lags. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1974) 13:545–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi S. P., Thompson G. L.Optimal Control Theory Applications to Management Science (1981) (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Skinner W. Manufacturing-Missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1969) May-June):136–145Google Scholar