The Effects of Coefficient Correlation Structure in Two-Dimensional Knapsack Problems on Solution Procedure Performance

References

  • Amini M. M., Racer M. A rigorous computational comparison of alternative solution methods for the generalized assignment problem. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):868–890LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E., Martin C. H. Pivot and complement—A heuristic for 0–1 programming. Management Sci. (1980) 26(1):86–96LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E., Zemel E. An algorithm for large zero-one knapsack problems. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(5):1130–1154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cario M. C., Clifford J., Hill R., Yang J., Yang K., Reilly C., Schmeiser B., Uzsoy R.Alternative methods for generating synthetic generalized assignment problems (1995) Proc. 4th Indust. Engrg. Res. Conf.:1080–1089Google Scholar
  • Drexl A. A simulated annealing approach to the multiconstraint zero-one knapsack problem. Comput. (1988) 40:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M., Jaikumar R., Van Wassenhove L. A multiplier adjustment method for the generalized assignment problem. Management Sci. (1986) 32(9):1095–1103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fréville A., Plateau G. An exact search for the solution of the surrogate dual of the 0–1 bidimensional knapsack problem. European J. Oper. Res. (1993) 68(3):413–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fréville A., Plateau G. An efficient preprocessing procedure for the multidimensional 0–1 knapsack problem. Discrete Appl. Math. (1994) 49:189–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fréville A., Plateau G. The 0–1 bi-dimensional knapsack problem: Toward an efficient high-level primitive tool. J. Heuristics (1996) 2(2):147–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frieze A. M., Clarke M. R. B. Approximation algorithms for the m-dimensional 0–1 knapsack problem: Worst-case and probabilistic analyses. European J. Oper. Res. (1984) 15:100–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guignard M., Rosenwein M. B. An improved dual based algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(4):658–663LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanafi S., Fréville A. An efficient tabu search for the multiconstraint zero-one knapsack problem. European J. Oper. Res. (1998) 106:659–675CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill R. R.Multivariate sampling with explicit correlation induction for simulation and optimization studies (1996) . Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Industrial, Welding and Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  • Hill R. R., Medeiros D. J., Watson E. F., Carson J. S., Manivannan M. S.An Analytical Comparison of Optimization Problem Generation Methodologies (1998) Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf.(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, D.C.) 609–615CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill R. R., Reilly C. H., Tew J. T., Manivannan S., Sadowski D. A., Seila A. F.Composition for multivariate random variables (1994) Proc. 1994 Winter Simulation Conf.(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Orlando, FL) 332–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hooker J. N. Needed: An empirical science of algorithms. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(2):201–212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iman R. L., Conover W. J. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Comm. Statist.: Simulation Comput. (1982) 11(3):311–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John T. C. Tradeoff solutions in single machine production scheduling for minimizing flow time and maximum penalty. Comput. Oper. Res. (1989) 16(5):471–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lokketangen A., Glover F. Solving zero-one mixed integer programming problems using tabu search. European J. Oper. Res. (1998) 106:624–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loulou R., Michaelides E. New greedy heuristics for the multidimensional 0–1 knapsack problem. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(6):1101–1114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martello S., Toth P., Christofides N., Mingozzi A., Sandi C. The 0–1 knapsack problem. Combinatorial Optimization (1979) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 237–279Google Scholar
  • Martello S., Toth P., Brans J. P. An algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Operational Research '81 (1981) (North-Holland, Amsterdam)589–603Google Scholar
  • Martello S., Toth P. A new algorithm for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):633–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martello S., Toth P. Upper bounds and algorithms for hard 0–1 knapsack problems. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(5):768–778LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzola J. B., Neebe A. W. An algorithm for the bottleneck generalized assignment problem. Comput. Oper. Res. (1993) 20(4):355–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore B., Peterson J., Reilly C., Balci O., Sadowski R., Nance R.Characterizing distributions of discrete bivariate random variables for simulation and evaluation of solution methods (1990) Proc. 1990 Winter Simulation Conf.(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New Orleans, LA) 294–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore B., Reilly C. H.Randomly generating synthetic optimization problems with explicitly induced correlation (1993) . OSU/ISE Working Paper, The Ohio State University Series Number 1993–002, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  • Pirkul H. A heuristic solution procedure for the multiconstraint zero-one knapsack problem. Naval Res. Logist. (1987) 34(2):161–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock G. A.Evaluation of solution methods for weighted set covering problems generated with correlated uniform random variables (1992) . Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  • Potts C. N., Von Wassenhove L. N. Algorithms for scheduling a single machine to minimize the weighted number of late jobs. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):843–858LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Potts C. N., Von Wassenhove L. N. Single machine scheduling to minimize total late work. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(3):586–595LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reilly C. H., Nelson B. L., Kelton W. D., Clark G. M.Optimization test problems with uniformly distributed coefficients (1991) Proc. of the 1991 Winter Simulation Conf.(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Phoenix, AZ) 866–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reilly C. H.Generating coefficients for optimization test problems with implicit correlation induction (1997a) 3Proc. 1997 IEEE Internat. Conf. Systems, Man, Cybernetics:2438–2443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reilly C. H.Why are knapsack problems with correlated coefficients harder to solve? (1997b) INFORMS Spring 1997 MeetingMay 7San Diego, CAPresentationGoogle Scholar
  • Reilly C. H., Medeiros D. J., Watson E. F., Carson J. S., Manivannan M. S.Properties of synthetic optimization problems (1998) Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf.(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington DC) 617–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saltzman M. J. Survey: Mixed integer programming. OR/MS Today (1994) 21(2):42–51Google Scholar
  • Thiel J., Voss S. Some experiences on solving multiconstraint zero-one knapsack problems with genetic algorithms. Comput. (1994) 32(4):226–242Google Scholar
  • Toyoda Y. A simplified algorithm for obtaining approximate solutions to zero-one programming problems. Management Sci. (1975) 21(12):1417–1427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trick M. A linear relaxation heuristic for the generalized assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. (1992) 39(2):137–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang J.A computational study on 0–1 knapsack problems generated under explicit correlation induction (1994) . MS Thesis, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Ohio State Universitym, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  • Zanakis S. H. Heuristic 0–1 linear programming: An experimental comparison of three methods. Management Sci. (1977) 24:91–104LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.