Technical Note: Mathematical Properties of the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

References

• Anderson S. P., Palma A., Thisse J.Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G. Review of R. D. Luce. individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis Amer. Econom. Rev. (1960) 50:186–188Google Scholar
• Dobson G., Kalish S. Positioning and pricing of a productline: Formulation and heuristics. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):107–125Link, Google Scholar
• Dobson G., Kalish S. Heuristics for pricing and positioning a productline using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. (1993) 39(2):160–175Link, Google Scholar
• Elrod T., Louviere J. J., Davey K. S. An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29:368–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:1–19Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Individualized hybrid models for conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (1996) 42(6):850–867Link, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. A., McFadden D. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica (1984) 42:1219–1240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Krishnamurti R. A heuristic approach to product design. Management Sci. (1987) 33:1123–1133Link, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Sukumar R. Heuristics for product-line selection using conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(12):1464–1478Link, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J. Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. J. Transport Econom. Policy (1988a) 22:93–119Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J.Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis (1988b) (Sage Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20:350–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D.Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• McBride R. D., Zufryden F. S. An integer programming approach to optimal product-line selection. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7:126–140Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Regression based specification tests for the multinomial logit model. J. Econometrics (1987) 34:63–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore W. L., Louviere J. J., Verma R.Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms (1998) August):98–113MSI Report, NoGoogle Scholar
• Nair S. K., Thakur L. S., Wen K. Near optimal solutions for product line design and selection: Beam search heuristics. Management Sci. (1995) 41(5):767–785Link, Google Scholar
• Zufryden F. S., Shocker A. D. A conjoint-measurement-based approach for optimal new product design and product positioning. Analytical Approaches to Product and Market Planning (1977) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) 100–114Google Scholar
• Zufryden F. S.Product-line optimization by integer programming (1982) (Annual ORSA/TIMS Meeting, San Diego, CA) Google Scholar