March Madness and the Office Pool

References

  • Atkins L. Sports betting is the other “March Madness.”. The Detroit News (1998) March 28). Op-Ed PageGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhouse W. NCAA tournament a scandal-in-waiting: Bet on it. Fort Worth Star-Telegram (1999) January 17). Sports SectionGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley R. A., Terry M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika (1952) 39:324–345Google Scholar
  • Breiter D. J., Carlin B. P. How to play office pools if you must. Chance (1997) 10:5–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlin B. P. Improved NCAA basketball tournament modeling via point spread and team strength information. Amer. Statist. (1996) 50:39–43Google Scholar
  • David H. A. Tournaments and paired comparisons. Biometrika (1959) 46:139–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards C. T. Double-elimination tournaments: Counting and calculating. Amer. Statist. (1996) 50:27–33Google Scholar
  • Edwards C. T. Non-parametric procedure for knockout tournaments. J. App. Statist. (1998) 25:375–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horen H., Riezman R. Comparing draws for single elimination tournaments. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:249–262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knuth D. E. A random knockout tournament. SIAM Rev. (1987) 29:127–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwertman N. C., McCready T. A., Howard L. Probability models for the NCAA regional basketball tournaments. Amer. Statist.45:35–38Google Scholar
  • Schwertman N. C., Schenk K. L., Holbrook B. C. More probability models for the NCAA regional basketball tournaments. Amer. Statist.50:34–38Google Scholar
  • Stern H. On the probability of winning a football game. Amer. Statist. (1991) 45:179–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.