A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection

References

• Andijani A.A. A multi-criterion approach for Kanban allocations. Omega (1998) 26(4):483–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechhofer R.E., Santner T.J., Goldsman D.M.Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons (1995) (John Wiley &Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Butler J.C., Jia J., Dyer J.S. Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103:531–545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C.-H., Lin J., Yücesan E., Chick S. Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Appl. (2000a) 10:251–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C.-H., Chen C.-H., Yücesan E. Computing effort allocation for ordinal optimization and discrete event simulation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (2000b) 45.5:960–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C.-H., Chen C.-H., Dai L., Yuan Y., Chen H.C., Medieros D.J., Watson E.F., Carson J.S., Manivannan M.S.Computing budget allocation for simulation experiments with different system structures (1998) Proc.1998 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 735–741Google Scholar
• Chick S.E., Inoue K., Medieros D.J., Watson E.F., Carson J.S., Manivannan M.S.Sequential allocations that reduce the risk for multiple comparisons (1998) Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 669–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chick S.E., Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Oper. Res. (2001) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Clemen R.T.Making Hard Decisions (1991) (PWS Kent Publishing, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Dawes R.M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psych. (1979) 34:571–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes R.M., Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psych. Bull. (1974) 81:95–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devroye L.Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrin M.D., Savit C.H.Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting (1988) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Dyer J.S., Edmunds T., Butler J.C., Jia J. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(6):749–762Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsman D., Nelson B.L., Medeiros D.J., Watson E.F., Carson J.S., Manivannan M.S.Statistical screening, selection, and multiple comparison procedures in computer simulation (1998) Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 159–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsman D., Nelson B.L., Schmeiser B.W., Nelson B.L., Kelton W.D., Clark G.M.Methods for selecting the best system (1991) Proc. 1991 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, N.J.) 177–186Google Scholar
• Gupta S.S., Panchapakesan S.Multiple Decision Procedures: Theory and Methodology of Selecting and Ranking Populations (1979) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Hammond J.S., Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. Even swaps: A rational method for making trade-offs. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(2):137–149Google Scholar
• Keeney R.L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Keeney R.L., von Winterfeldt D. Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1991) 38:191–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K., Lin D.K.J. Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc (1999) Series CForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Logical Decisions, Inc.Logical Decisions for Windows, Version 4.0 (1996) (Logical Decisions Inc., Golden, CO) Google Scholar
• Matejcik F.J., Nelson B.L. Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation. Oper. Res. (1995) 43:633–640Link, Google Scholar
• Mesquite Software, Inc.CSIM17 Users' Guide (1994) (Mesquite Software Inc., Austin, TX) Google Scholar
• Microsoft CorporationMicrosoft Foundation Class Library, Part One: Microsoft Visual C++, Version 4 (1995) (Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA) Google Scholar
• Morrice D.J., Butler J.C., Mullarkey P.W., Medieros D.J., Watson E.F., Carson J.S., Manivannan M.S.An approach to ranking and selection for multiple performance measures (1998) Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 719–725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrice D.J., Butler J.C., Mullarkey P.W., Gavirneni S., Farrington P.A., Nembhard H.B., Sturrock D.T., Evans G.W.Sensitivity analysis in ranking and selection for multiple performance measures (1999) Proc. 1999 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 618–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrice D.J., Mullarkey P.W., Kenyon A.S., Schwetman H., Zhou J., Andradottir S., Healy K.J., Withers D.H., Nelson B.L.Simulation of a signal quality survey (1997) Proc. 1997 Winter Simulation Conf.(The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 1265–1272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palisade CorporationBestFit: Probability Distribution Fitting for Windows User's Guide (1996) (Palisade Corporation, Newfield,New York) Google Scholar
• Rinott Y. On two-stage procedures and related probability-inequalities. Comm. Statist. Theory and Methods (1978) A8:799–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saaty T.The Analytical Hierarchy Process (1988) (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Schoemaker P.J., Waid C.C. An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models. Management Sci. (1982) 28:182–196Link, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decisional Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar