Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation

References

• Acs Z., Audretsch D.Innovation and Small Firms (1990) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K., Nelson R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–619Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D.Innovation and Industry Evolution (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• AUTMThe AUTM Licensing Survey (1996) (Association of University Technology Managers, Norwalk, CT) Google Scholar
• Bound J., Cummins C., Griliches Z., Hall B., Jaffe A., Griliches Z. Who does R…D and who patents?. R…D, Patents, and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Caves R. Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. J. Econ. Literature (1998) 36:1947–1982Google Scholar
• Christiansen C., Bower J. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I., Griliches Z. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market's valuation of R…D and patents. AEA Papers Proc. (1988) 78(2):419–423Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levin R., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) II(Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer J., Sirbu M. Une analyse econometrique de l'effort de recherché et developpement de l'industrie Francaise. Rev. Econom. (1978) 29:940–954Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy (1982) 11:147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econ. Literature (1988) 26:1120–1171Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.American Capitalism (1956) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Gans J., Stern S.Contracting and competition: The two faces of appropriability(Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Gartner W., Shane S. Measuring entrepreneurship over time. J. Bus. Venturing (1995) 10:283–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski P. What do we know about entry?. Inter. J. Indus. Organ. (1995) 13:421–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gort M., Klepper S. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econ. J. (1982) 92:630–653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Rev. Econ. … Statist. (1998) 65:119–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Highfield R., Smiley R. New business starts and economic activity: An empirical investigation. Inter. J. Indust. Organ. (1987) 5:51–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu D., Bernstein D. Managing the university technology licensing process: Findings from case studies. J. Assoc. University Technology Managers (1997) 9:1–33Google Scholar
• Kamien M., Schwartz N.Market structure and Innovation (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Klevorick A., Levin R., Nelson R., Winter S. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Res. Policy (1995) 24:185–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J. The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econ. (1994) 25(2):319–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin R., Cohen W., Mowery D. R…D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. Amer. Econ. Rev. (1985) 75:20–24Google Scholar
• Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econ. Activity (1987) 3:783–831Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology specific. Res. Policy (1996) 25:451–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6:83–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econ. (1959) 67:297–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econ. Literature (1995) 33:48–90Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Orr D. The determinants of entry: A study of Canadian manufacturing insutries. Rev. Econ. … Statist. (1974) 41:58–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K., Wald S.The Conditions For Success In Technological Innovation (1971) (OECD, Paris, France) Google Scholar
• Roberts E.Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer F.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1980) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Teece D., Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. The Competitive Challenge (1987) (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Teece D. Competition, cooperation and innovation. J. Econ. Behavior Organ. (1992) 18:1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J., Abernathy W. A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega (1975) 3:638–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J., Kim L., Kleindorfer P. Invasion of a stable business by radical innovation. The Management of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing (1984) (Plenum Press, New York) 113–151Google Scholar
• Venkatarman S., Katz J., Brockhaus R. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (1997) (JAI Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. Appropriability of innovation benefit as a predictor of the source of innovation. Res. Policy (1982) 11:95–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Winter S. Schumpterian competition in alternative technological regimes. J. Econ. Behavior Organ. (1984) 4:287–320Crossref, Google Scholar