Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects

References

  • Abernathy F. H., Dunlop J. T., Hammond J. H., Weil D.A Stitch in Time: Lean Retailing and the Transformation of Manufacturing—Lessons from the Apparel and Textile Industries (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Adler P., Borys B. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:61–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken M., Hage J. Organizational interdependence and intraorganizational structure. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1968) 33:912–930CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alderfer C. P., Hackman J. R., Suttle J. L. Group and intergroup relations. Improving the Quality of Work Life (1977) (Goodyear, Palisades, CA) Google Scholar
  • Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology (1984) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Hendrick C. Groups in organizations: Extending laboratory models. Annual Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Group and Intergroup Processes (1987) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:420–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellamy N., Buchanan W. W., Goldsmith C. H., Campbell J., Stitt L. W. Validation study of the WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee joint replacement in osteoarthritis. J. Orthopedic Rheumatology (1988) 1:95–108Google Scholar
  • Bohmer R. Critical pathways at Massachusetts General Hospital. J. Vascular Surgery (1998) 28:373–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (1992) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Chilingerian J., Kimberly J. R., Minvielle E. Evaluating quality outcomes against best practice: A new frontier. The Quality Imperative: Measurement and Management of Quality in Healthcare (2000) (Imperial College Press, London, U.K.) 141–167Google Scholar
  • Clark K., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Clark K., Wheelwright S. Organizing and leading ‘heavyweight’ development teams. California Management Rev. (1992) 34(3):9–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cleary P. D., Edgman-Levitan S., Roberts M., Moloney T. W., Mullen W., Walker J. D. Patients evaluate their hospital care: A national survey. Health Affairs (1991) 10:254–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4:386–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Comstock D. E., Scott W. R. Technology and the structure of subunits: Distinguishing individual and workgroup effects. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:177–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Nohria N. Case management and the integration of labor. Sloan Management Rev. (1994) 35(2):11–23Google Scholar
  • Deming W. E.Out of the Crisis (1986) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg E. Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Comm. Res. (1990) 17:139–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M., Rafaeli A. Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. (2002) 39(3):309–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C., Romney A. K., Freeman S. C. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropologist (1987) 89:310–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gerteis M., Edgman-Levitan S., Daley J., Delbanco T.Through the Patient's Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care (1993) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: Coordinating patient care. Harvard Business School Case (1998) (Cambridge, MA)899–213Google Scholar
  • Gittell J. H., Fairfield K., Bierbaum B., Head W., Jackson R., Kelly M., Laskin R., Lipson S., Siliski J., Thornhill T., Zuckerman J. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and the length of stay: A nine hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care (2000) 38(8):807–819CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure performance: A reassessment of post-bureaucracy theory. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):467–482LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. A relational theory of coordination: Coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. (2002) . UnpublishedGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman P. S., Ravlin E., Schminke M., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1987) 9(JAI Press Greenwich, CT) 121–173Google Scholar
  • Hackman R., Lorsch J. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46:1251–1271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti M., Clark K. B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 557–605Google Scholar
  • Katz J. N., Chang L. C., Sangha O., Fossel A. H., Bates D. W. Can comorbidity be measured by survey rather than medical record review? Medical Care (1996) 34:73–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. Dimensions of management system and performance in continuous process organizations. Human Relations (1978) 31(1):59–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khandwalla P. "Mass output orientation and organizational structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1974) 19:74–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12:1–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1986) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luft H. S.Hospital Volume, Physician Volume, and Patient Outcomes: Assessing the Evidence (1990) (Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
  • Malone T., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mohr L. B. Organizational technology and organizational structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:444–459CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1981) (Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Roberts K. H. Task group structure, communication and effectiveness in three organizations. J. Appl. Psych. (1977) 62:674–681CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennings J. M. "The relevance of the structural-contingency model for organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20:393–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rubenstein A., Barth R., Douds C. Ways to improve communications between R&D groups. Res. Management (1971) 14:49–59Google Scholar
  • Rubinstein S. The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of the Saturn Corporation. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2000) 53(1):197–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saavedra R., Earley P. C., Van Dyne L. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. of Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(1):61–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:349–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shortell S. M., Zimmerman J. E., Rousseau D. E., Gillies R. R., Wagner D. P., Draper E. A., Knaus W. A., Duffy J. The performance of intensive care units: Does good management make a difference? Medical Care (1994) 32:508–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson W., Gilly M. C. Problem solving networks in organizations: Intentional design and emergent structure. Social Sci. Res. (1993) 22:92–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart A. L., Hays R. D., Ware J. E. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care (1988) 26:724–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. Impacts of perceived environmental variability on patterns of work related communication. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22(3):482–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M., Nadler D. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):613–624CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A., Delbecq A., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1976) 41:322–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:145–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waller M. J. The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):127–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K., Roberts K. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young G., Charns M., Daley J., Forbes M. G., Henderson W., Khuri S. F. Patterns of coordination and clinical outcomes: Study of surgical services. Health Services Res. (2000) 33:1211–1236Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.