Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits

References

• Alexander C.Notes on the Synthesis of Form (1964) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Arrow K.The Limits of Organization (1974) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Ashby W. R.Introduction to Cybernetics (1956) (Methuen, London, U. K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astley W. G., Van de Ven A. H. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:245–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. Validating an expert system that designs organizations. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 179–193Google Scholar
• Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B. Organizational consultant: Creating a useable theory for organizational design. Management Sci. (1996) 32(12):1648–1662Link, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1970) 35(2):201–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluedorn A. C., Lundgren E. F. A culture-match perspective for strategic change. Res. Organ. Change Development (1993) 7:137–179Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistok, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application (1998) (Kluwer Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capon N., Farley J. U., Hoening S. Determinants of financial performance—A metaanalysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1143–1159Link, Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprises (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Daft R., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554Link, Google Scholar
• DiPadova L. N., Faerman S. R. Using the competing values framework to facilitate managerial understanding across levels of organizational hierarchy. Human Res. Management (1993) 32(1):143–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty D., Glick H. W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 38(6):1198–1250Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(4):514–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(3):313–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksen B., Døjbak D. Data collection procedure, response rates, and analyses of nonrespondents. Publications from the Department of Management (1998a) (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark) Google Scholar
• Eriksen B., Døjbak D. Descriptive analyses. Publications from the Department of Management (1998b) (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark) Google Scholar
• Fry L. W. Technology-structure research: Three critical issues. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25(3):532–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces (1974) 4(3):28–36Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.An Executive Briefing on Strategy Structure and Process (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Glick W. H. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):601–616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Gresov C. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(3):431–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinity: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M. Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(1):72–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall R. M., Hass E. J., Johnson N. Organization size, complexity, and formalization. Amer. Sociological. Rev. (1967) 32(6):903–912Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hax A., Hax C., Majluf N. S.Strategic Management: An Integrative Perspective (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hooijberg R., Petrock F. On cultural change: Using the competing values framework to help leaders execute a transformational strategy. Human Res. Management (1993) 32(1):29–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt J. G.Leadership: A New Synthesis (1991) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order; Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin A., Volberda H. W. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):519–534Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Binings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller D. The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:55–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):159–178Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D., de Vries M. F. R. K., Toulouse J.-M. Top executive locus of control and its relation to strategy-making, structure and environment. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25(2):237–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M. L., Kolb D. A., Rubin J. M., McIntyre J. M. A congruence model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Psychology: Readings on Human Behavior in Organizations (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 587–603Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M. L.Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools and Processes (1988) (Scott-Foresman, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
• Naman J. L., Slevin D. P. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(2):137–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociological. Rev. (1967) 32:194–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Quinn J. B., Rohrbaugh J. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Sci. (1983) 29(3):363–377Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation on complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Robbins S. P.Organization Theory-The Structure and Design of Organizations (1983) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations, Rational, Natural and Open Systems (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Seidler J. A technique for collecting quantitative data and controlling measurement error in orgaqnizational analysis. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1974) 39:816–831Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 26:467–482Google Scholar
• Tagiuri R., Litwin G. H.Organizational Climate (1968) (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Prescott J. E. Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten D. A., Cameron K. S.Developing Management Skills (2002) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Woodward J.Industrial Organization, Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2000) (South-Western College Publishing-Thomson Learning, Crawfordsville, IN) Google Scholar
• Zajac E. J., Kraatz M. S., Bresser R. K. F. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):753–773Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. F., Krakower J. Y. Quantitative and qualitative studies in organizational culture. Res. Organ. Change Dev. (1991) 5:83–114Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. F., O'Connor E. J. Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies' benefit: The roles of organizational design and culture. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(4):701–728Crossref, Google Scholar