Complementary Product Integration by High-Technology New Ventures: The Role of Initial Technology Strategy

References

• Alvarez S. A., Meyer G. D. Technology based strategic alliances: Are they good for entrepreneurial firms? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (1999) (Babson College, Babson Park, MA) Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K. B. Managing modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75:84–95Google Scholar
• Belsley D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R. E. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. (1980) (John Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergin T., Khosrowpour M., Travers J.CASE: Issues and Trends for the 1990s and Beyond (1993) (Idea Group Publishing, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Krishnan V., Mahajan V. Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environments. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11. Part 2):50–64Link, Google Scholar
• Bhide A.The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown A., Carney D., Morris E.Principles of Case Tool Integration (1994) (Oxford Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin L., Sengupta S. The co-diffusion of complementary innovations: Supermarket scanners and UPC symbols. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10:148–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callahan J., MacKenzie S. Metrics for strategic alliance control. R&D Management (1999) 29(4):365–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G.Product Leadership: Creating and Launching Superior New Products (2000) (Perseus Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
• Cusumano M., Shelby R.Microsoft Secrets (1995) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cusumano M., Yoffie D.Competing on Internet Time (1998) (The Free Press, New York) 180Google Scholar
• Debelak D.Entrepreneur: Bringing Your Product to Market (1997) (Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Dhebar A. Complementarity, compatibility, and product change: Breaking with the past? J. Product Innovation Management (1995) 12:136–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) (Macmillan Publishing Company Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Hoch D., Roeding C., Purkert G., Lindner S.Secrets of Software Success (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hurst K.Engineering Design Principles (1999) (Halsted Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., MacCormack A. Developing products on internet time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) September):35–45Google Scholar
• Kemerer C. Reliability of function points measurement. Comm. of the ACM (1993) 36:85–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kotabe M., Swan S. The role of strategic alliances in hightechnology new product development. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:621–636Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A., Verganti R., Iansiti M. Developing products on ?internet time? : The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):133–150Link, Google Scholar
• Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy J.Dynamics of Software Development (1995) (Microsoft Press)Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Acad. of Management Rev. (1997) 22:974–996Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nesheim J. L.High-Tech Startup (2000) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Perry W. E. The best data processing measures. Systems Development (1986) 6(6):4–6Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengupta S. Some approaches to complementary product strategy. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:352–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengupta S., Bucklin L. P. To ally or not to ally? Marketing Management (1995) 4:25–33Google Scholar
• Shan W. An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firm. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(2):129–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sum S., Koch D., Nyen C. F. Development of a framework system for tool integration in a product information archive. Comput. in Indust. (1996) 30:225–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas I., Neimeh B. Definition of tool integration environments. IEEE Software (1992) 9(2):29–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. The role of flexibility in the development of new products: An empirical study. Res. Policy (1997) 26:105–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich T., Eppinger S. D.Product Design and Development (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Verona G. A resource-based view of product development. Acad. of Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):132–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wind J., Mahajan V. Issues and opportunities in new product development. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Bogner W. C. Technology strategy and software new ventures? performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. J. Bus. Venturing (2000) 15:135–173Crossref, Google Scholar