Adaptive Inventory Control for Nonstationary Demand and Partial Information

References

  • Agrawal Narendra, Smith Stephen A. Estimating negative binomial demand for retail inventory management with unobservable lost sales. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1996) 43(6):839–861CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravi Anupindi, Morton Thomas E., Pentico David. The nonstationary stochastic lead-time inventory problem: Near myopic bounds, heuristics, and testing. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):124–129LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow Kenneth J., Theodore Harris, Marshak Jacob. Optimal inventory theory. Econometrica (1951) 19(3):250–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoury Katy S. Bayes solution to dynamic inventory models under unknown demand distributions. Management Sci. (1985) 31(9):1150–1160LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum Leonard E., Petrie Ted, Soules George, Weiss Norman. A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains. Ann. Math. Statist. (1970) 41(1):164–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bean J. C., Smith and R. L. Conditions for the existence of planning horizons. Math. Oper. Res. (1984) 9(3):391–401LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas Dimitri P.Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control (1995) 1(Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.) Google Scholar
  • Dempster A. P., Laird N. M., Rubin D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statist. Soc., Series B (1977) 39:1–38Google Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Schweitzer P. J., Tijms H. C. Contraction mappings underlying undiscounted Markov decision problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1978) 65:711–730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego Guillermo, Ryan Jennifer K., Simchi-Levi David. Minimax analysis for the discrete finite horizon inventory model (1996) (Columbia University, New York, NY) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Graves Stephen C.A single-item inventory model for a non-stationary demand process (1997) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Hadley G., Whitin T. M. An optimal final inventory model. Management Sci. (1961) 7:179–183LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu C., Lovejoy W. S., Shafer S. L. Comparison of some suboptimal control policies in medical drug therapy. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(5):696–709LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kambhamettu Srinivas S.Parameter estimation for partially observable Markov decision processes (2000) (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL) . Master's thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Karlin Samuel. Dynamic inventory policy with varying stochastic demands. Management Sci. (1960) 6(3):231–258LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kurawarwala Abbas A., Matsuo Hirofumi. Forecasting and inventory management of short life-cycle products. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):131–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere Martin A., Porteus Evan L.Informational dynamics and new product pricing (1995) (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Nahmias S., Graves S. C., Kan Rinnooy A. H. G., Zipkin P. H. Single product, single-location models. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Logistics of Production and Inventory (1993) 4(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leroux Brian G., Puterman Martin L. Maximum-penalized-likelihood estimation for independent and Markov-dependent mixture models. Biometrics (1992) 48:545–568CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy William S. Some monotonicity results for partially observed Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(5):736–743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy William S. Myopic policies for some inventory models with uncertain demand distributions. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):724–738LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loverjoy William S. A survey of algorithmic methods for partially observed Markov decision processes. Ann. Oper. Res. (1990) 28:47–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loverjoy William S. Stopped myopic policies in some inventory models with generalized demand processes. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):688–707LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loverjoy William S. Suboptimal policies with bounds, for parameter adaptive decision processes. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(3):583–599LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monahan George E. A survey of partially observable Markov decision processes: Theory models, and algorithms. Management Sci. (1982) 28(1):1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morton T. E., Wecker W. E. Discounting, ergodicity and convergence for Markov decision processes. Management Sci. (1977) 23(8):890–900LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rabiner Lawrence R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE (1989) 77(2):257–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhenius D. Incomplete information in Markovian decision models. Ann. Statist. (1974) 2:1327–1334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarf Herbert E. Bayes solution of the statistical inventory problem. Ann. Math. Statist. (1959) 30:490–508CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarf Herbert E. Some remarks on Bayes solution to the inventory problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1960) 7:591–596CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smallwood Richard D., Sondik Edward J. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:1071–1088LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song Jing-Sheng, Paul Zipkin. Inventory control in a fluctuating demand environment. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(2):351–370LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song Jing-Sheng. Managing inventory with the prospect of obsolescence. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):215–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Veinott Arthur F., Scarf Herbert E., Gilford Dorothy M., Shelly Maynard W. Optimal stockage policies with nonstationary stochastic demands. Multistage Inventory Models and Techniques (1963) (Office of Naval Research Monograph Series on Mathematical Methods in Logistics, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 85–115Google Scholar
  • White Chelsea C., Scherer William T. Solution procedures and partially observed Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(5):791–797LinkGoogle Scholar
  • White Chelsea C., Scherer William T. Finite-memory suboptimal design for partially observed Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(3):439–455LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.