A Dynamic Programming Procedure for Pricing American-Style Asian Options

References

  • Alziary B., Décamps J. P., Koehl P. F. A P.D.E. approach to Asian options: Analytical and numerical evidence. J. Banking Finance (1997) 21:613–640CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barraquand J., Martineau D. Numerical valuation of high-dimensional multivariate American securities. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1995) 30:383–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barraquand J., Pudet T. Pricing of American path-dependent contingent claims. Math. Finance (1996) 6:17–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Volumes I and II (1995) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Billingsley P. Probability and Measure (1986) 2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Black F., Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. (1973) 81:637–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouaziz L., Briys E., Crouhy M. The pricing of forwardstarting Asian options. J. Banking Finance (1994) 18:823–839CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle P., Broadie M., Glasserman P. Monte Carlo methods for security pricing. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1997) 21:1267–1321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle P., Tian Y. Pricing lookback and barrier options under the CEV process. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1999) 34(2):241–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brezinski C. Algorithmes d' Accélération de la Convergence (1978) . Collection langages et algorithmes de l'informatique. Éditions Technip, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Broadie M., Glasserman P. Pricing American-style securities using simulation. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1997a) 21(8-9):1323–1352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadie M. (1997b) . A stochastic mesh method for pricing highdimensional American options. ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  • Carverhill A. P., Clewlow L. J. Flexible convolution. Risk (1990) 3:25–29Google Scholar
  • ConzeA. Viswanathan. Path dependent options: The case of lookback options. J. Finance (1991) 46:1893–1906CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox J. C. The constant elasticity of variance option pricing model. J. Portfolio Management (1996) 22:15–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox J. C., Ross S. A., Rubinstein M. Option pricing: A simplified approach. J. Financial Econom. (1979) 7:229–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curran M. Valuing Asian and portfolio options by conditioning on the geometric mean price. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1705–1711LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Boor C. A Practical Guide to Splines. Applied Mathematical Sciences Series (1978) 27(Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geman H., Yor M. Bessel processes, Asian options, and perpetuities. Math. Finance (1993) 3:349–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P., Heidelberger P., Shahabuddin P. Asymptotically optimal importance sampling and stratification for pricing path dependent options. Math. Finance (1999) 9(2):117–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant D., Vora G., Weeks D. Path-dependent options: Extending the Monte Carlo simulation approach. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1589–1602LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haurie A., L'Ecuyer P. Approximation and bounds in discrete event dynamic programming. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1986) AC-31(3):227–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hull J. Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliff, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hull J., White A. Efficient procedures for valuing European and American path-dependent options. J. Derivatives (1993) 1(Fall):21–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karatzas I., Shreve S. E.Methods of Mathematical Finance (1998) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kemna A. G. Z., Vorst A. C. F. A pricing method for options based on average asset values. J. Banking Finance (1990) 14:113–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen T. R. Simple, fast, and flexible pricing of Asian options. J. Comput. Finance (2001) 4:89–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • L'Ecuyer P., Lemieux C. Variance reduction via lattice rules. Management Sci. (2000) 46(9):1214–1235LinkGoogle Scholar
  • L'Ecuyer P., Malenfant J. Computing optimal checkpointing strategies for rollback and recovery systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. (1988) 37(4):491–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemieux C., L'Ecuyer P., Medeiros D. J., Watson E. F., Carson J. S., Manivannan M. S. Efficiency improvement by lattice rules for pricing Asian options. Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf. (1998) (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 579–586CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemieux C. Selection criteria for lattice rules and other low-discrepancy point sets. Math. Comput. Simulation (2001) 55(1-3):139–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy E. Pricing European average rate currency options. J. Internat. Money Finance (1992) 11:474–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longstaff F. A., Schwartz E. S. Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(1):113–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritchken P., Sankarasubramanian L., Vijh A. M. The valuation of path-dependent contracts on the average. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1202–1213LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T. Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers L. C. G., Shi Z. The value of an Asian option. J. Appl. Probab. (1995) 32:1077–1088CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sidi A. Extension and completion of Wynn's theory on convergence of columns of the epsilon table. J. Approx. Theory (1996) 86:21–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turnbull S. M., Wakeman L. M. A quick algorithm for pricing European average options. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1991) 26:377–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilmott P., Dewynne J., Howison J.Option Pricing: Mathematical Models and Computation (1993) (Oxford Financial Press, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Wu R., Fu M. C. (2000) . Optimal exercise policies and simulation-based valuation for American-Asian options. ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  • Wynn P. On the convergence and stability of the epsilon algorithm. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. (1966) 3(1):91–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang P. G. Flexible arithmetic Asian options. J. Derivatives (1995) 2:53–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zvan R., Forsyth P. A., Vetzal K. R. Robust numerical methods for PDE models of Asian options. J. Comput. Finance (1998) 1(2):39–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zvan R., Forsyth P. A., Vetzal K. R. Discrete Asian barrier options. J. Comput. Finance (1999) 3(1):41–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.